insource.co.jp 55 D
🛡️ SEO 10 🤖 GEO 89 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 74

insource.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

insource.co.jp
📊

insource.co.jp shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 84/100, outperforming 98% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places insource.co.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 1.4× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (10) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than insource.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)10 × 0.25 = 2.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)89 × 0.40 = 35.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)74 × 0.15 = 11.1
Weighted sum = 2.5 + 35.6 + 5.6 + 11.1
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 37%
Rank #367839
-34 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

insource.co.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 37%) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why insource.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat1.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

10/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

92 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

389 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 205
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 株式会社インソース | 人材育成/社員研修・ITによる生産性向上支援
  • ✓ og:description — インソースは、東証プライム上場の社会人教育/コンサルティング企業です。お客さまの「組織」と「個」の人事課題を解決するために、新入社員から中堅・管理職までの社員研修/教育管理システム・LMS/DX人材育成/オンライン研修/ストレスチェックなど全力でご支援をしています。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

89/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
insource.co.jp
78
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 634 elements (634 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1221
Raw Density51.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

71%
🗑️ 29%
Useful Content (449.7 KB)Bloat (165.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context66% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage63 / 95 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

90 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 26.9% · SNR: 2.72 · Signal: 115122 / Noise: 42399 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of insource.co.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
人材育成、社員研修、ITによる生産性向上
Target Audience
企業
Pricing Model
未提及
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-26

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1522 ms
Raw HTML Size615.3 KB
Visible Text Size449.7 KB

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1522 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3051
DOM nodes
615 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=14400
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

74/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

616
internal links
38
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 78/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for insource.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/insource.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=insource.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1010 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
78
Single-page score
-27
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
51
Avg across 1010 pages · Range 0–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 78, but internal pages average only 51 — a -27-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
15%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
369412
Avg Bloat
52.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.insource.co.jp/en/company/history.html
History - insource
pricing 77 6.0× 2564 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/package-government.html
職員1,000人の教育管理が1人でできるLMS(自治体・官公庁のお客さま向け) | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 47.5× 601 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/online-training.html
集合研修を、オンライン研修に切り替える | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 46.4× 641 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/leaf-package-home_study.html
自宅学習支援パッケージ | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 45.6× 610 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/index.html
サービス一覧 | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 47.7× 555 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/work-efficient.html
作業時間を徹底比較!事務の"時短"はLeafで | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 44.1× 657 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/work-efficient-e-learning.html
作業時間を徹底比較!~30分で始めるeラーニング | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 43.8× 667 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/it-tool/service/work-efficient-evaluation.html
20時間の差がつく!~Leafで評価業務のムダ削減 | eラーニング/研修システム・LMS 「Leaf (リーフ)」
pricing 75 43.3× 674 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/customer/service_blueprint.html
サービス改善ワークショップ~サービス・ブループリントを描き競争力を高める(1日間):現場で使える研修ならインソース
pricing 75 37.8× 1114 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/customer/improvement_workshop.html
CS改善ワークショップ(1日間):現場で使える研修ならインソース
pricing 75 37.7× 1104 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/customer/cs-bunsho.html
CS向上研修~お客さま目線での文書対応力を磨く(1日間):現場で使える研修ならインソース
pricing 75 37.7× 1110 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/customer/digital_cs.html
EC時代の接遇力向上研修~「対面」ならではの価値を提供する(1日間):現場で使える研修ならインソース
pricing 75 38.0× 1106 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/service/jinji-menter.html
人事部・採用・メンター担当向けサービス:現場で使える研修ならインソース
pricing 70 52.9× 804 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/customer/customer_top.html
CS(顧客満足)研修 | 現場で使える研修ならインソース
pricing 70 99.8× 520 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/digital-academy/faq/index.html
インソースデジタルアカデミー全力Q&A:1名から参加できる研修の会社インソース
pricing 70 74.0× 530 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/rashiku/faq/index.html
らしく全力Q&A | 「すべての人材を見える化する」人材紹介サービスでもインソース
pricing 70 56.5× 542 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/en/company/vision.html
Philosophy - insource
about 67 10.5× 525
https://www.insource.co.jp/gam-batte/mgr/article/mb_mgr-5.html
ビジネス格言「情報の取得は"外"、その深化は"内"」|Gambatte|ガンバッテ|社員研修,教育 職員研修 人材育成ならインソース
pricing 62 52.8× 502 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/gam-batte/cs/article/service_cs_up55.html
即見直しを! 顧客が不快を感じる「話し方・挙動の悪癖」集|Gambatte|ガンバッテ|社員研修,教育 職員研修 人材育成ならインソース
pricing 62 50.9× 607 💰 Pricing
https://www.insource.co.jp/gam-batte/history/article/iwasaki6.html
岩崎小彌太に浸る7日間vol.6「三綱領につながる小彌太の哲学③企業活動のIntegrity(誠実)and Fairness(公正)」|Gambatte|ガンバッテ|社員研修,教育 職員研修 人材育成ならインソース
pricing 62 54.1× 799 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/webins/ 198 52 0% 49.9× High JS Bloat
/education-online-support-service/ 85 62 0% 49.1× High JS Bloat
/gam-batte/ 64 60 0% 54.9× High JS Bloat
/infini-talk/ 49 54 0% 59.7× High JS Bloat
/mobilus/ 31 54 0% 59.8× High JS Bloat
/grasys-detail/ 26 54 0% 51.9× High JS Bloat
/it-tool/ 12 70 0% 45.9× High JS Bloat
/markerise/ 8 56 0% 61.7× High JS Bloat
/hr-prime/ 6 60 0% 60.6× High JS Bloat
/customer/ 5 74 0% 50.2× High JS Bloat
/en/ 2 72 0% 8.3× High JS Bloat
/new-service-lineup/ 2 60 0% 61.7× High JS Bloat
/ieyasu/ 1 60 0% 65.9× High JS Bloat
/rashiku/ 1 70 0% 56.5× High JS Bloat
/president_school/ 1 62 0% 54.9× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/insource.co.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to insource.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
insource.co.jp (this site) 78 84 WordPress 1.4× 0
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
hupishop.com.br 87 92 WordPress 2.4× 23 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite insource.co.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to insource.co.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://insource.co.jp",
  "logo": "https://insource.co.jp/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://insource.co.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://insource.co.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for insource.co.jp:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
97
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →