index.hu 50 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 16 🏗️ Arch 73

index.hu — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

index.hu
📊

index.hu scores 51/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, placing it in the middle tier of indexed domains — there is clear room for improvement. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), index.hu is trailing the benchmark, indicating room for competitive improvement. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 2.7× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. With only minimal AI bot access, the domain is largely invisible to the ecosystem of AI-driven discovery tools.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (16) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than index.hu?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)16 × 0.20 = 3.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 28.8 + 3.2 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
40
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
43
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #4521
+59 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 59%
Score 51/100

index.hu punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why index.hu ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

41 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

111 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 240
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://index.hu/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → hu
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
index.hu
50
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 43/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 251 elements (251 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4453
Raw Density5.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

58
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
High
Blocklist Risk
Extractability58/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskHigh — 3 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

37%
🗑️ 63%
Useful Content (201.1 KB)Bloat (343.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context77% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage137 / 177 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

57 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 63.1% · SNR: 0.58 · Signal: 51471 / Noise: 87990 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of index.hu and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides AI-powered sprint planning and resource optimization for distributed teams, helping them improve productivity and reduce wasted time.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, agile coaches, and teams involved in software development and project management.
Pricing Model
Tiered subscription model with a free plan and paid plans starting from $10/user/month, offering increasing features and capacity.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-driven sprint planning and real-time resource allocation, providing a significant advantage over traditional project management tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2219 ms
Raw HTML Size544.8 KB
Visible Text Size201.1 KB

Performance & Speed

16/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2219 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4127
DOM nodes
545 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public,max-age=60
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comdoubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → http://index.hu/sitemap/sitemapindex.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

261
internal links
465
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → hu
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for index.hu
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/index.hu" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=index.hu" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 227 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
+15
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
65
Avg across 227 pages · Range 33–85
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
210071
Avg Bloat
30.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://index.hu/kultur/fabryonline/
Index - Kultúr - Fábry: Itt rendkívüli módon észnél kell lenni
pricing 85 9.4× 2734 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/magyaronline/
Index - Belföld - A 'Whiskys' ügyvédje: Nyitott és pacifista ember vagyok
pricing 85 7.2× 3911 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/viszkis3/
Index - Belföld - Válaszol a Rablovics Úr védője
pricing 85 7.9× 3908 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/borokaionlin/
Index - Belföld - Borókai: 'Ez is csak afféle meló'
pricing 85 8.0× 3463 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kulfold/vtuk0124/
Index - Külföld - Világtükör
pricing 85 9.0× 2941 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kulfold/vtuk0221/
Index - Külföld - Világtükör
pricing 85 9.1× 2897 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kulfold/haiderlemond/
Index - Külföld - Haider háttérbe húzódik
pricing 75 14.9× 1728 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/tech/net/pontcom/
Index - Tech - A pont com biznisz
pricing 75 17.5× 1423 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/olaj1/
Index - Belföld - Vádol a kirúgott rendőrszázados
pricing 75 17.4× 1481 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/tech/szoftver/msdoj/
Index - Tech - MS-DOJ: fix iksz?
pricing 75 17.3× 1418 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kulfold/voros/
Index - Külföld - Vörös és fekete
pricing 75 19.6× 1241 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kulfold/ausztria3/
Index - Külföld - Ausztriában előretört a jobboldal
pricing 75 17.4× 1452 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/olaj3/
Index - Belföld - Az országnak kevés Karancsija van
pricing 75 14.6× 1760 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/nykorona/
Index - Belföld - Magyarország Millenniumi Hisztije: a Királyi Kirakós
pricing 75 14.7× 1643 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/aaryonline/
Index - Belföld - Aáry-Tamás Lajos: A miniszter minden esetben megfontolja javaslataimat
pricing 75 13.7× 1799 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kultur/lovasionline/
Index - Kultúr - Lovasi: Csendes evolúcióban vagyunk folyamatosan
pricing 75 10.8× 2320 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/toth/
Index - Belföld - Pozícionáljuk az országot
pricing 75 16.0× 1561 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/balogonline/
Index - Belföld - 'Miért gondolja, hogy a politikában nem lehet Istent szolgálni?'
pricing 75 12.0× 2085 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/kulfold/vtuk0207/
Index - Külföld - Világtükör
pricing 75 11.5× 2163 💰 Pricing
https://index.hu/belfold/cianossz/
Index - Belföld - A cián Szolnokot fenyegeti
pricing 75 15.3× 1577 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/tech/ 95 65 0% 30.6× High JS Bloat
/belfold/ 66 66 0% 29.9× High JS Bloat
/kulfold/ 35 67 0% 28.3× High JS Bloat
/bulvar/ 21 65 0% 30.2× High JS Bloat
/kultur/ 6 66 0% 29.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 59 0% 25.7× High JS Bloat
/velemeny/ 1 67 0% 32.6× High JS Bloat
/tudomany/ 1 67 0% 24.6× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 33 1% 210.9× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 227 pages
welovebudapest.com ×227
femina.hu ×227
divany.hu ×227
velvet.hu ×227
twitter.com ×227
totalcar.hu ×227
economx.hu ×227
indavideo.hu ×227
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/index.hu

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to index.hu. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
index.hu (this site) 50 51 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1
zakordon.rayon.in.ua 75 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 1 Compare →
csongrad-csanad.mlsz.hu 75 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
heimkinoverein.de 75 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 1 Compare →
rushout.jp 75 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 0 Compare →
daeatdiet.com 75 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

F 2 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

59
Homepage ACRI
33
Inner Avg ACRI
+26
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
60%
Inner Avg Ghost
62
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
33 60% pricing https://index.hu/api
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 10/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

12 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

24
Total Links
12
Unique Domains
12.0
Avg/Page
50%
Diversity
blog.hu economx.hu femina.hu velvet.hu dex.hu twitter.com forum.index.hu indavideo.hu divany.hu totalcar.hu
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 9.3

AI trust scores for the domains index.hu links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to index.hu. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Index",
  "url": "https://index.hu",
  "logo": "https://index.hu/assets/images/favicons/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Index",
  "url": "https://index.hu",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://index.hu/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Index?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Index does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Index work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Index."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for index.hu:

Current Score
51
Projected Score
72
Improvement
+21 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history