i2cinc.com 72 B
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 94

i2cinc.com — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

i2cinc.com
📊

With a solid 77/100 ACRI, i2cinc.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 86% of sites in the Radar. In the finance sector, i2cinc.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 6.8× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 25
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than i2cinc.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 34.0 + 7.8 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
67
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #687361
-54 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

i2cinc.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 14%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why i2cinc.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryfinance
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

58 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

143 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 18
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.i2cinc.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — i2c Inc. | Proven Engine Powering Modern Banking & Payments
  • ✓ og:description — Outpace legacy and unproven modern platforms with i2c’s all-in-one platform and composable solutions built for speed, reliability and scale.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the finance sector, bbkonline.com (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
i2cinc.com
68
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. bbkonline.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 67/100 — Good
Structured Elements 171 elements (171 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1277
Raw Density13.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

60
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability60/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (44.1 KB)Bloat (257.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context63% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage24 / 38 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.4% · SNR: 0.17 · Signal: 11293 / Noise: 65946 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1242 ms
Raw HTML Size301.7 KB
Visible Text Size44.1 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1242 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2005
DOM nodes
302 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.i2cinc.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

174
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for i2cinc.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/i2cinc.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=i2cinc.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
56
Avg across 10 pages · Range 44–64
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 68, but internal pages average only 56 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
28%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
4684
Avg Bloat
99.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://i2cinc.com/features
i2c | Proven Engine Powering Next Gen Banking and Payments
product 64 81.0× 763
https://i2cinc.com/docs
i2c | Proven Engine Powering Next Gen Banking and Payments
docs 64 81.0× 763
https://i2cinc.com/faq
i2c | Proven Engine Powering Next Gen Banking and Payments
support 64 81.0× 763
https://i2cinc.com/integrations
i2c | Proven Engine Powering Next Gen Banking and Payments
integrations 64 81.0× 763
https://i2cinc.com/about
Who We Are - Transforming Financial Technology
about 57 47.9× 471
https://i2cinc.com/products
Issuer Processing Platform with No Limitations
product 57 45.9× 473
https://i2cinc.com/blog
i2c Inc. Blogs - Smarter Payments - Integrated Commercei2c Inc. Blogs - Smarter Payments - Integrated Commerce
blog 54 102.0× 298
https://i2cinc.com/pricing
Get in Touch with Us - i2c Inc.
pricing 44 157.5× 126
https://i2cinc.com/case-studies
Explore Case Studies - See How We Power Global Payments
pricing 44 161.0× 138 💰 Pricing
https://i2cinc.com/contact
Get in Touch with Us - i2c Inc.
support 44 157.5× 126
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 57 0% 45.9× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 64 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 64 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 57 0% 47.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 54 0% 102.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 44 0% 157.5× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 44 0% 161.1× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 157.5× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 64 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 64 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
tracking.i2cinc.com ×10
instagram.com ×10
www2.i2cinc.com ×10
apis.i2cinc.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/i2cinc.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar finance Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to i2cinc.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
i2cinc.com (this site) 68 77 WordPress 6.8× 1
plenita.ro 78 90 WordPress 6.3× 1 Compare →
trustonefinancial.org 79 90 WordPress 7.2× 1 Compare →
digitalnewstoday.in 78 82 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
bpm.com 79 88 WordPress 4.8× 1 Compare →
rsir.com 78 86 WordPress 3.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to i2cinc.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "I2cinc",
  "url": "https://i2cinc.com",
  "logo": "https://www.i2cinc.com/wp-content/themes/i2cinc/assets/images/favicon.webp",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is I2cinc?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what I2cinc does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does I2cinc work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with I2cinc."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for i2cinc.com:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+12 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history