heartfailurematters.org 73 B
🛡️ SEO 64 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 40 🏗️ Arch 93

heartfailurematters.org — Global SEODiff Score 73/100

heartfailurematters.org
📊

At 84/100, the ACRI for heartfailurematters.org indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the healthcare sector, heartfailurematters.org outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.8×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

73
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 1, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 1
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than heartfailurematters.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)64 × 0.25 = 16.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)40 × 0.20 = 8.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 16.0 + 34.8 + 8.0 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 73 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
71
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #630758
-61 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

heartfailurematters.org ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why heartfailurematters.org ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

64/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

75 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

150 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.heartfailurematters.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Heart Failure Information for Patients & Caregivers - Heart Failure Matters
  • ✓ og:description — Practical information on heart failure for patients, families and caregivers from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, agedcarefind.com.au (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
heartfailurematters.org
74
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. agedcarefind.com.au has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 71/100 — Good
Structured Elements 209 elements (209 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1395
Raw Density15.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

77
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability77/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

20%
🗑️ 80%
Useful Content (29.1 KB)Bloat (111.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage29 / 29 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

5 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 79.4% · SNR: 0.26 · Signal: 7441 / Noise: 28602 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of heartfailurematters.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Heart failure information for patients and caregivers
Target Audience
Patients, families, and caregivers
Pricing Model
Free
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu)
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3287 ms
Raw HTML Size140.8 KB
Visible Text Size29.1 KB

Performance & Speed

40/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3287 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

943
DOM nodes
141 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.heartfailurematters.org/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

197
internal links
37
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 74/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for heartfailurematters.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/heartfailurematters.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=heartfailurematters.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to heartfailurematters.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
heartfailurematters.org (this site) 74 84 WordPress 4.8× 1
volunteerforever.com 80 88 WordPress 4.7× 1 Compare →
blogs.juniper.net 82 88 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
reliantmedicalgroup.org 82 88 WordPress 2.5× 1 Compare →
newly-registered-domains.whoisxmlapi.com 81 84 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
trinityhealth.org 82 90 WordPress 6.0× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite heartfailurematters.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to heartfailurematters.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Heartfailurematters?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Heartfailurematters does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Heartfailurematters work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Heartfailurematters."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for heartfailurematters.org:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history