guardianaudits.com 55 D
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 69 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 52

guardianaudits.com — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

guardianaudits.com
📊

guardianaudits.com scores 60/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, placing it in the middle tier of indexed domains — there is clear room for improvement. Within the developer vertical, this places guardianaudits.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 15% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. A 8.5× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (40) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than guardianaudits.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)69 × 0.40 = 27.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)52 × 0.15 = 7.8
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 27.6 + 9.4 + 7.8
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
9
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 46%
Rank #462532
+6 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 52%
Score 60/100

guardianaudits.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why guardianaudits.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat8.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

46 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

92 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 16
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 21
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://guardianaudits.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Comprehensive Smart Contract Audits | Guardian
  • ✓ og:description — Devastatingly effective Smart Contract security, for when it has to be right the first time.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

69/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
guardianaudits.com
36
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 9/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 3 elements (3 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1248
Raw Density0.2%
💡Low structure score (9/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 3 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

38
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability38/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

11%
🗑️ 89%
Useful Content (22.2 KB)Bloat (167.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio8.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context54% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage51 / 94 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 88.3% · SNR: 0.13 · Signal: 5692 / Noise: 42945 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1123 ms
Raw HTML Size190.0 KB
Visible Text Size22.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1123 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

853
DOM nodes
190 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

52/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

15
internal links
21
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 36/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for guardianaudits.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/guardianaudits.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=guardianaudits.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
36
Single-page score
-9
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
27
Avg across 10 pages · Range 26–32
Topical Cohesion
5%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
365
Avg Bloat
71.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://guardianaudits.com/blog
Blog | Guardian Audits
blog 32 177.4× 126
https://guardianaudits.com/case-studies
Comprehensive Smart Contract Audits | Guardian
social-proof 32 185.9× 143
https://guardianaudits.com/pricing pricing 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/about about 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/products product 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/features product 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/docs docs 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/faq support 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/contact support 26 44.0× 12
https://guardianaudits.com/integrations integrations 26 44.0× 12
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/pricing/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 32 1% 177.4× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 32 1% 185.9× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 26 0% 44.0× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/guardianaudits.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to guardianaudits.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
guardianaudits.com (this site) 36 60 Custom / Proprietary 8.5× 0
developer.travis-ci.com 61 80 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 0 Compare →
marked.nodejs.cn 61 71 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0 Compare →
help.pythonanywhere.com 61 71 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0 Compare →
developer.openstack.org 61 72 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 0 Compare →
torneodelleregioni.lnd.it 61 77 Joomla 9.5× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to guardianaudits.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Guardianaudits",
  "url": "https://guardianaudits.com",
  "logo": "https://d1pnnwteuly8z3.cloudfront.net/images/f70168b2-a3ba-411c-9dd5-9ccf228d3067/07fd3d27-dbb2-4b94-803a-cdb4d31c46ce.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Guardianaudits",
  "url": "https://guardianaudits.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://guardianaudits.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Guardianaudits?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Guardianaudits does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Guardianaudits work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Guardianaudits."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for guardianaudits.com:

Current Score
60
Projected Score
76
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history