gohugo.io 59 D
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 54 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 66

gohugo.io — Global SEODiff Score 59/100

gohugo.io
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for gohugo.io is strong: an ACRI of 71/100 places it ahead of 70% of domains in the index. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 58), gohugo.io performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (40.6× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

59
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (50) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (41×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 25 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than gohugo.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)54 × 0.40 = 21.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)66 × 0.15 = 9.9
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 21.6 + 14.8 + 9.9
Global SEODiff Score = 59 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
35
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
90
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #5426
+30 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

gohugo.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gohugo.io ranks here

Tech stackHugo
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat40.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

51 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

147 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The world's fastest framework for building websites
  • ✓ og:description — Hugo is one of the most popular open-source static site generators. With its amazing speed and flexibility, Hugo makes building websites fun again.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

54/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gohugo.io
36
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 35/100 — Low
Structured Elements 12 elements (12 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words324
Raw Density3.7%
💡Low structure score (35/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 12 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

38
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability38/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (45/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (2.2 KB)Bloat (87.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio40.6× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context80% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 5 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 89.2 KB, but only 2.2 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (40.6×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.5% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 562 / Noise: 22264 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHugo
AI-Readiness Score90/100
ServerNetlify
CDNnetlify
HTTP Status200
Load Time507 ms
Raw HTML Size89.2 KB
Visible Text Size2.2 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

507 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

385
DOM nodes
89 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public,max-age=0,must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → netlify

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

66/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

13
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 36/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gohugo.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gohugo.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gohugo.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 784 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
36
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
45
Avg across 784 pages · Range 26–82
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
306534
Avg Bloat
77.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gohugo.io/quick-reference/glossary/
GlossaryGlossary | Hugo
pricing 82 4.5× 5278 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/quick-reference/functions/
FunctionsFunctions | Hugo
docs 77 5.9× 3900
https://gohugo.io/quick-reference/methods/
MethodsMethods | Hugo
docs 77 5.9× 3441
https://gohugo.io/configuration/all/
All settingsAll settings | Hugo
pricing 77 7.6× 2426 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/contribute/documentation/
DocumentationDocumentation | Hugo
pricing 67 10.4× 2328 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/about/license/
LicenseLicense | Hugo
about 67 10.0× 1451
https://gohugo.io/content-management/front-matter/
Front matterFront matter | Hugo
pricing 67 11.4× 2590 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/templates/types/
Template typesTemplate types | Hugo
other 67 11.2× 2142
https://gohugo.io/content-management/urls/
URL managementURL management | Hugo
pricing 67 12.9× 2097 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/templates/introduction/
Introduction to templatingIntroduction to templating | Hugo
pricing 67 10.6× 2895 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/content-management/syntax-highlighting/
Syntax highlightingSyntax highlighting | Hugo
pricing 67 10.7× 1774 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/templates/shortcode/
Shortcode templatesShortcode templates | Hugo
pricing 67 11.5× 1926 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/quick-reference/emojis/
EmojisEmojis | Hugo
pricing 67 12.3× 6712 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/functions/js/batch/
js.Batchjs.Batch | Hugo
other 67 10.3× 2288
https://gohugo.io/configuration/markup/
Configure markupConfigure markup | Hugo
pricing 67 10.7× 3571 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/functions/resources/getremote/
resources.GetRemoteresources.GetRemote | Hugo
blog 64 17.7× 1163
https://gohugo.io/about/features/
FeaturesFeatures | Hugo
about 64 15.2× 907
https://gohugo.io/troubleshooting/faq/
Frequently asked questionsFrequently asked questions | Hugo
pricing 64 14.5× 973 💰 Pricing
https://gohugo.io/tools/migrations/
Migrate to HugoMigrate to Hugo | Hugo
other 64 19.1× 731
https://gohugo.io/content-management/archetypes/
ArchetypesArchetypes | Hugo
other 64 18.9× 959
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/methods/ 167 48 0% 50.5× High JS Bloat
/functions/ 153 46 0% 70.7× High JS Bloat
/commands/ 45 47 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/configuration/ 32 57 0% 29.5× High JS Bloat
/content-management/ 24 61 0% 27.9× High JS Bloat
/templates/ 13 58 0% 26.9× High JS Bloat
/host-and-deploy/ 13 57 0% 28.2× High JS Bloat
/shortcodes/ 10 49 0% 37.9× High JS Bloat
/render-hooks/ 8 60 0% 23.5× High JS Bloat
/quick-reference/ 7 66 0% 16.1× High JS Bloat
/troubleshooting/ 6 50 0% 41.4× High JS Bloat
/getting-started/ 4 63 0% 20.1× High JS Bloat
/tools/ 4 51 0% 34.1× High JS Bloat
/installation/ 4 60 0% 21.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 3 63 0% 15.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 784 pages
jetbrains.com ×784
bep.is ×784
github.com ×784
fosstodon.org ×784
twitter.com ×784
themes.gohugo.io ×784
cloudcannon.com ×784
discourse.gohugo.io ×784
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gohugo.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gohugo.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gohugo.io (this site) 36 71 Hugo 40.6× 0
pomoc.sellintegro.pl 61 84 Hugo 3.7× 0 Compare →
ge.globo.com 61 65 Express 38.5× 3 Compare →
de.brompton.com 61 79 Nuxt.js 29.5× 0 Compare →
hungryrobot.com 61 76 Shopify 10.0× 0 Compare →
marked.nodejs.cn 61 71 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gohugo.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

36
Homepage ACRI
40
Inner Avg ACRI
-4
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
37%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
36 40% blog https://gohugo.io/functions/resources/bytype/
36 40% docs https://gohugo.io/docs
36 40% blog https://gohugo.io/functions/resources/babel/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 15/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

13 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

127
Total Links
13
Unique Domains
8.5
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
cloudcannon.com github.com fosstodon.org jetbrains.com bep.is discourse.gohugo.io twitter.com themes.gohugo.io en.wikipedia.org simple.wikipedia.org
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 13.1

AI trust scores for the domains gohugo.io links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gohugo.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Gohugo",
  "url": "https://gohugo.io",
  "logo": "https://gohugo.io/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Gohugo",
  "url": "https://gohugo.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://gohugo.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Gohugo?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Gohugo does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Gohugo work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Gohugo."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gohugo.io:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

6.6
AI-Trust
#626
Global Rank
64%
Percentile
29
Inbound AI Links
8
Outbound AI Links
48
Avg Inbound ACRI
14%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
ushpk.ru 60 0.0 ← cites you
11ty.dev 58 0.0 ← cites you
sudo.ws 57 0.0 ← cites you
morawietz.dev 57 0.0 ← cites you
ceda.ac.uk 56 0.0 ← cites you
adsl-pool.sx.cn 56 0.0 ← cites you
frugalware.org 54 0.0 ← cites you
radio-t.com 53 0.0 ← cites you
sagikazarmark.hu 52 0.0 ← cites you
dpark.io 52 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →