gawby.com 53 D
🛡️ SEO 37 🤖 GEO 69 ⚡ Perf 29 🏗️ Arch 70

gawby.com — Global SEODiff Score 53/100

gawby.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for gawby.com is strong: an ACRI of 76/100 places it ahead of 84% of domains in the index. Compared to other social sites (avg score: 57), gawby.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (10%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Heavy markup overhead (25.2× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

53
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (29) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (25×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 24, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than gawby.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)37 × 0.25 = 9.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)69 × 0.40 = 27.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)29 × 0.20 = 5.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 9.2 + 27.6 + 5.8 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 53 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
83
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 13%
Rank #127395
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 16%
Score 76/100

gawby.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gawby.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat25.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

37/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

43 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

132 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.gawby.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — GAWBY: Movies, TV Shows, Celebrities & More
  • ✓ og:description — Discover movies, TV shows & celebrities. Find OTT links, ratings, photos & trailers. Filter by genre, year, country & certification.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

69/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gawby.com
65
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 83/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 475 elements (475 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2282
Raw Density20.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

54
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability54/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (18.2 KB)Bloat (441.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio25.2× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage202 / 202 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 459.2 KB, but only 18.2 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (25.2×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.0% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 4660 / Noise: 112898 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerBunnyCDN-CA1-1025
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1021 ms
Raw HTML Size459.2 KB
Visible Text Size18.2 KB

Performance & Speed

29/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1021 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

5840
DOM nodes
459 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

238
internal links
35
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 65/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gawby.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gawby.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gawby.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
65
Single-page score
-17
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
48
Avg across 10 pages · Range 47–62
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 65, but internal pages average only 48 — a -17-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
829
Avg Bloat
8.5×
Ext. Citations
5
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gawby.com/about
About GAWBY - Movies, TV Shows & Celebrities
about 62 16.9× 388
https://gawby.com/pricing
Establishing a secure connection ...
pricing 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/features
Establishing a secure connection ...
product 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/products
Establishing a secure connection ...
product 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/blog
Establishing a secure connection ...
blog 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/docs
Establishing a secure connection ...
docs 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/case-studies
Establishing a secure connection ...
social-proof 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/faq
Establishing a secure connection ...
support 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/integrations
Establishing a secure connection ...
integrations 47 7.6× 49
https://gawby.com/contact
Establishing a secure connection ...
support 47 7.6× 49
🔗
Outbound External Citations
5 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
bunny.net ×9
play.google.com ×1
twitter.com ×1
facebook.com ×1
linkedin.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gawby.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gawby.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gawby.com (this site) 65 76 Custom / Proprietary 25.2× 1
avtozvuk.ua 67 80 Custom / Proprietary 25.6× 2 Compare →
mybrandnewlogo.com 57 78 Custom / Proprietary 26.2× 1 Compare →
sistemapoliedro.com.br 56 75 Custom / Proprietary 26.5× 1 Compare →
an1.com 61 79 Custom / Proprietary 22.6× 0 Compare →
cape-town.photos 61 79 Custom / Proprietary 20.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gawby.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Gawby",
  "url": "https://gawby.com",
  "logo": "https://a.gawby.com/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Gawby?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Gawby does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Gawby work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Gawby."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gawby.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history