gashapon.jp 58 D
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 69 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 67

gashapon.jp — Global SEODiff Score 58/100

gashapon.jp
📊

With a solid 68/100 ACRI, gashapon.jp is well-positioned for AI search — better than 62% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places gashapon.jp above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

58
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (39) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 1, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 23 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 1
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than gashapon.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)69 × 0.40 = 27.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)67 × 0.15 = 10.0
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 27.6 + 7.8 + 10.0
Global SEODiff Score = 58 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
20
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #21584
+36 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

gashapon.jp punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gashapon.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

42 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

93 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — ガシャポンオフィシャルサイト
  • ✓ og:description — バンダイのカプセルトイ「ガシャポン」のオフィシャルサイトです。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

69/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gashapon.jp
43
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 20/100 — Low
Structured Elements 91 elements (91 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words7285
Raw Density1.2%
💡Low structure score (20/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 91 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

51
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability51/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

38%
🗑️ 62%
Useful Content (93.9 KB)Bloat (152.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context27% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage52 / 195 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 27% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

60 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 61.9% · SNR: 0.62 · Signal: 24036 / Noise: 38968 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of gashapon.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website is an online retailer specializing in capsule toys and collectible figures, primarily focusing on Japanese anime, manga, and game merchandise.
Target Audience
Anime and manga fans, collectors, and parents looking for gifts for children.
Pricing Model
Variable, based on individual product prices, with a range from 300円 to 1,000円 (approximately $2-8 USD).
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive selection of Japanese capsule toys and figures, catering to a niche market with a strong focus on Japanese pop culture.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Product category filtering (商品種類でさがす)Date filtering (発売年, 発売月)Search functionality (さがす, 検索条件をリセット)Template-generated pages for product listings and collections.
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO visibility due to reliance on Japanese keywords.
• Lack of international shipping options (implied).
• Potential difficulty for non-Japanese speakers to navigate the site.
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-03-01 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1664 ms
Raw HTML Size246.1 KB
Visible Text Size93.9 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1664 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1917
DOM nodes
246 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

67/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

205
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 43/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gashapon.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gashapon.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gashapon.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 3 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
43
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
45
Avg across 3 pages · Range 32–62
Total Words
2993
Avg Bloat
458.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gashapon.jp/products
商品検索|ガシャポンオフィシャルサイト
pricing 62 36.9× 2825 💰 Pricing
https://gashapon.jp/blog
ガシャポンブログ | ガシャポンオフィシャルサイト
blog 42 37.2× 149
https://gashapon.jp/contact
お問合せ|ガシャポンオフィシャルサイト
support 32 1300.5× 19
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 62 0% 36.9× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 42 0% 37.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 32 0% 1300.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 3 pages
line.me ×3
twitter.com ×3
youtube.com ×2
bandai.co.jp ×2
account.bandainamcoid.com ×2
tiktok.com ×2
instagram.com ×2
social-plugins.line.me ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gashapon.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gashapon.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gashapon.jp (this site) 43 68 WordPress 2.6× 0
exoticivoire.com 68 80 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
hianime.ro 68 15 WordPress 4.1× 1 Compare →
handyhase.de 68 76 WordPress 4.7× 1 Compare →
boomlibrary.com 68 87 WordPress 42.9× 1 Compare →
foot-star.com 68 86 WordPress 24.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gashapon.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gashapon.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Gashapon",
  "url": "https://gashapon.jp",
  "logo": "https://gashapon.jp/webclip2509.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Gashapon",
  "url": "https://gashapon.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://gashapon.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Gashapon?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Gashapon does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Gashapon work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Gashapon."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gashapon.jp:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history