gameram.com 60 C
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 51 ⚡ Perf 63 🏗️ Arch 73

gameram.com — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

gameram.com
📊

At 64/100, gameram.com falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 58), gameram.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. The site allows access to some AI bots but restricts others, creating an uneven visibility profile across AI-powered services.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but AI Readiness (51) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (305×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than gameram.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)51 × 0.40 = 20.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)63 × 0.20 = 12.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 20.4 + 12.6 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
60
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
48
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #945059
-47 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

gameram.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 47%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gameram.com ranks here

Tech stackWix
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

35 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

149 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.gameram.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Gameram | Social Network For Gamers
  • ✓ og:description — Connect with gamers on Gameram! Find teammates, share experiences, and celebrate achievements across all platforms. Meet your perfect teammate today!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

51/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gameram.com
42
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 48/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 14 elements (14 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words199
Raw Density7.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

50
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Medium
Blocklist Risk
Extractability50/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskMedium — 2 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (2.5 KB)Bloat (769.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage12 / 12 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 771.6 KB, but only 2.5 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.7% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 647 / Noise: 196883 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWix
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerPepyaka
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time719 ms
Raw HTML Size771.6 KB
Visible Text Size2.5 KB

Performance & Speed

63/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

719 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

548
DOM nodes
772 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private,max-age=0,must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

16
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 42/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gameram.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gameram.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gameram.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 2 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
42
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
43
Avg across 2 pages · Range 33–53
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
889
Avg Bloat
493.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://gameram.com/faq
Gameram Plus | Gameram
pricing 53 197.3× 698 💰 Pricing
https://gameram.com/about
About | Gameram
pricing 33 789.4× 191 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 53 1% 197.3× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 33 1% 789.4× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 2 pages
instagram.com ×2
play.google.com ×2
web.gameram.com ×2
x.com ×2
facebook.com ×2
apps.apple.com ×2
linkedin.com ×2
support.google.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gameram.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gameram.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gameram.com (this site) 42 64 Wix 305.1× 2
vntlogistics.com 67 82 WordPress 14.8× 2 Compare →
vievebeauty.com 67 84 Shopify 10.7× 2 Compare →
petroleo-brent-hoy.wilkinsonpc.com.co 67 77 Cloudflare Pages 6.2× 2 Compare →
petroleo-wti-hoy.wilkinsonpc.com.co 67 77 Cloudflare Pages 6.1× 2 Compare →
chambersign.fr 67 80 WordPress 48.2× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gameram.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gameram.com:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+13 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history