gamemad.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 68

gamemad.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

gamemad.com
📊

gamemad.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 80/100, outperforming 94% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, gamemad.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than gamemad.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 34.0 + 7.8 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
64
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
55
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 34%
Rank #342805
-28 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

gamemad.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 34%) than in AI search (Top 6%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gamemad.com ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

202 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

801 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 105
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://gamemad.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant-TW
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 大型專業遊戲資訊網站,每日更新遊戲禮包碼、序號、免費能量、免費轉盤、遊戲新聞、遊戲攻略、精選好玩免費小遊戲、H5小遊戲、Flash小遊戲 - 遊戲狂
  • ✓ og:description — 大型專業遊戲資訊網站,每日更新遊戲禮包碼、序號、免費能量、免費轉盤、遊戲新聞、遊戲攻略、精選好玩免費小遊戲、H5小遊戲、Flash小遊戲-coin master,金幣大師、遊戲新聞、遊戲攻略、貪吃蛇、貪食蛇, wormate.io, 魔物獵人崛起,魔物獵人崛起,三國志戰略版,原神,先遣戰士,尼爾人工生命,鴻圖之下,瓦爾海姆,Apex英雄,三國群英傳8,惡靈古堡8 ~ 我們為您帶來上千個免費線上小遊戲、數千種免費線上好玩遊戲、遊戲攻略秘技、遊戲最新消息、遊戲影片、遊戲圖片、每日免費虛寶序號、最新手遊資訊,包括Flash小遊戲、H5小遊戲、手機網頁遊戲等,不用下載立即玩的免費小遊戲、免費好玩遊戲區,馬上來玩吧。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gamemad.com
69
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 64/100 — Good
Structured Elements 134 elements (134 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1100
Raw Density12.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

38%
🗑️ 62%
Useful Content (137.6 KB)Bloat (215.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context10% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage12 / 119 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 10% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

60 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 61.0% · SNR: 0.64 · Signal: 35220 / Noise: 55049 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1522 ms
Raw HTML Size352.6 KB
Visible Text Size137.6 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1522 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2324
DOM nodes
353 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

4
tracker scripts
3
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Moderate trackers — consider lazy-loading non-essential scripts
googlesyndication.comgoogletagmanager.comfacebook.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://gamemad.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

445
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant-TW
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 69/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gamemad.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gamemad.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gamemad.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gamemad.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gamemad.com (this site) 69 80 Express 2.6× 2
acties.nl 69 75 Express 2.7× 2 Compare →
batteryboss.in 69 80 Express 2.8× 2 Compare →
superdry.it 69 79 Express 3.0× 2 Compare →
superdry.be 69 79 Express 3.0× 2 Compare →
cremashop.eu 70 79 Express 2.6× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gamemad.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Gamemad?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Gamemad does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Gamemad work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Gamemad."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gamemad.com:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
83
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history