flores-shop.com.ua 69 C
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 46 🏗️ Arch 79

flores-shop.com.ua — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

flores-shop.com.ua
📊

flores-shop.com.ua shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. In the ecommerce sector, flores-shop.com.ua outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. Token bloat registers at 5.5× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. With 5 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. Partial bot access means the domain is visible to some AI systems but not accessible to others — some key bots are restricted.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 4, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 4
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than flores-shop.com.ua?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)46 × 0.20 = 9.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)79 × 0.15 = 11.8
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 32.0 + 9.2 + 11.8
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
80
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
49
Structure
avg 36
50
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #653644
-46 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

flores-shop.com.ua ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 19%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why flores-shop.com.ua ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage5 blocks
Token bloat5.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

189 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

339 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://flores-shop.com.ua/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru-UA
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Доставка цветов в Киеве - купить цветы в интернет-магазине STUDIO Flores
  • ✓ og:description — Интернет-магазин доставки цветов в Киеве ⭐ Самые свежие цветы ☝ Большой ассортимент ✔️ Индивидуальный подход к каждому клиенту 🤩
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, plantes-avenue.fr (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
flores-shop.com.ua
67
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plantes-avenue.fr has schema coverage of 7 blocks and uses PrestaShop. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 49/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 298 elements (287 lists, 11 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4055
Raw Density7.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks5 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

70
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
Low
Blocklist Risk
Extractability70/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskLow — 1 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

18%
🗑️ 82%
Useful Content (52.9 KB)Bloat (237.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.5× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context78% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage47 / 60 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 81.8% · SNR: 0.22 · Signal: 13539 / Noise: 60885 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
ServerApache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time726 ms
Raw HTML Size290.7 KB
Visible Text Size52.9 KB

Performance & Speed

46/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

726 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3065
DOM nodes
291 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=3, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

79/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://flores-shop.com.ua/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

469
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru-UA
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for flores-shop.com.ua
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/flores-shop.com.ua" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=flores-shop.com.ua" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to flores-shop.com.ua. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
flores-shop.com.ua (this site) 67 75 WordPress 5.5× 5
materiels-electriques.fr 83 91 WordPress 3.2× 5 Compare →
tl.emojiguide.com 84 90 WordPress 3.6× 4 Compare →
nishikidori.com 84 90 WordPress 2.7× 3 Compare →
chuya-online.com 85 90 WordPress 2.4× 3 Compare →
okusuritsuhan.shop 88 90 WordPress 2.1× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite flores-shop.com.ua when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for flores-shop.com.ua:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history