feedo.cz 61 C
🛡️ SEO 42 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 16 🏗️ Arch 82

feedo.cz — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

feedo.cz
📊

With an ACRI of 86/100, feedo.cz stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. In the infrastructure sector, feedo.cz outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 3.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (16) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 9 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 27
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than feedo.cz?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)42 × 0.25 = 10.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)16 × 0.20 = 3.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 10.5 + 35.2 + 3.2 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
85
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 38%
Rank #380998
-37 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 86/100

feedo.cz ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 38%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why feedo.cz ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

42/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

70 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

112 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.feedo.cz/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → cz
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — feedo.cz - Kočárky, hračky, autosedačky - vše pro děti a maminky
  • ✓ og:description — Feedo.cz je tu pro všechna miminka a jejich maminky. Doprava zdarma nebo od 39 Kč. Tvořte s Feedo krabicemi.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
feedo.cz
77
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 85/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 561 elements (561 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2576
Raw Density21.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

81
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability81/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

26%
🗑️ 74%
Useful Content (228.2 KB)Bloat (644.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage330 / 347 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

30 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.9% · SNR: 0.35 · Signal: 58407 / Noise: 165057 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of feedo.cz and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Baby products including strollers, toys, car seats
Target Audience
Parents and caregivers of children
Pricing Model
Free shipping or from 39 Kč
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time7255 ms
Raw HTML Size872.9 KB
Visible Text Size228.2 KB

Performance & Speed

16/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

7255 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4744
DOM nodes
873 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.feedo.cz/sitemaps/categories_feedocz_650716.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

766
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → cz
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 77/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for feedo.cz
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/feedo.cz" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=feedo.cz" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
77
Single-page score
-18
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 1 pages · Range 59–59
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 77, but internal pages average only 59 — a -18-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
498
Avg Bloat
169.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://feedo.cz/blog pricing 59 169.8× 498 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 59 0% 169.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
instagram.com ×1
jaknamaterstvi.cz ×1
youtube.com ×1
picturesfeedo.com ×1
facebook.com ×1
tiktok.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/feedo.cz

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to feedo.cz. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
feedo.cz (this site) 77 86 Cloudflare Pages 3.8× 2
endocrinology.org 88 90 Cloudflare Pages 1.9× 7 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
tilibraexpress.com.br 87 87 Express 1.9× 3 Compare →
sigmaflows.com 88 93 Express 2.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to feedo.cz. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Feedo?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Feedo does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Feedo work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Feedo."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for feedo.cz:

Current Score
86
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history