epubli.de 62 C
🛡️ SEO 48 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 73

epubli.de — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

epubli.de
📊

With an ACRI of 87/100, epubli.de stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. In the social sector, epubli.de outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 15.8× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 8, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 8
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than epubli.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)48 × 0.25 = 12.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 12.0 + 31.2 + 7.8 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
83
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #172890
-16 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 87/100

epubli.de ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 17%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why epubli.de ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat15.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

48/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

70 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

161 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.epubli.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Eigenes Buch drucken & veröffentlichen – schnell & einfach | epubli
  • ✓ og:description — Buchdruck & Selfpublishing mit epubli: ✓ Buch drucken und binden günstig & in Top-Qualität ✓ Buch und E-Book kostenfrei veröffentlichen ➤ Jetzt starten!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
epubli.de
71
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 83/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 323 elements (323 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1579
Raw Density20.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

67
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability67/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

6%
🗑️ 94%
Useful Content (25.4 KB)Bloat (375.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio15.8× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage31 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 93.7% · SNR: 0.07 · Signal: 6494 / Noise: 96120 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of epubli.de and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Selfpublishing allows authors to publish their books or ebooks independently, bypassing traditional publishing houses and retaining creative control. This platform
Target Audience
Authors, independent writers, self-publishers, ebook creators, small business owners looking to publish their content.
Pricing Model
Free to publish, with a 30% revenue share on print sales. Pricing calculator available for custom honorariums.
🔗 Integration Partners
AmazonVLB
🏆 Competitive Moat
End-to-end self-publishing solution with print-on-demand and ebook distribution, offering a streamlined and cost-effective alternative to traditional publishing.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
FAQ schemaPrice calculator pageBlog post about book formatting
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Potential SEO issues with template-generated pages
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-09

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1984 ms
Raw HTML Size400.8 KB
Visible Text Size25.4 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1984 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2079
DOM nodes
401 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

59
internal links
272
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → de
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 71/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for epubli.de
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/epubli.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=epubli.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 3 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
71
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
58
Avg across 3 pages · Range 49–72
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 71, but internal pages average only 58 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
5%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
3546
Avg Bloat
70.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://epubli.de/blog
Selfpublishing - wie du ohne Verlag veröffentlichst
pricing 72 31.8× 2727 💰 Pricing
https://epubli.de/contact
Deine Kontaktmöglichkeiten zu epubli
pricing 54 151.9× 354 💰 Pricing
https://epubli.de/pricing
Leistungen und Preise – epubli
pricing 49 27.4× 465 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 72 0% 31.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 54 0% 151.9× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 49 0% 27.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 3 pages
epubli.com ×3
facebook.com ×3
youtube.com ×3
neopubli.de ×3
instagram.com ×2
epubli.zendesk.com ×2
linkedin.com ×2
whatsapp.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/epubli.de

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to epubli.de. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
epubli.de (this site) 71 87 WordPress 15.8× 2
recenzer.cz 83 90 WordPress 8.3× 2 Compare →
blog.indianweddingsaree.com 82 90 WordPress 5.8× 3 Compare →
fathimaparvin.com 82 90 WordPress 5.1× 1 Compare →
marigliano.net 82 90 WordPress 4.7× 1 Compare →
officesnapshots.com 81 84 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite epubli.de when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to epubli.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 6% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Epubli?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Epubli does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Epubli work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Epubli."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for epubli.de:

Current Score
87
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history