emclient.com 79 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 90

emclient.com — Global SEODiff Score 79/100

emclient.com
📊

With an ACRI of 90/100, emclient.com stands out as one of the highest-performing sites in AI search visibility, outranking 99% of its peers. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), emclient.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

79
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than emclient.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 34.4 + 12.4 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 79 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
75
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 10
75
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #57961
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

emclient.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why emclient.com ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

53 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

155 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — eM Client - Email Client and Calendar Software for Windows and Mac
  • ✓ og:description — This free email client should be installed on your desktop. eM Client is just great.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
emclient.com
70
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 75/100 — Good
Structured Elements 79 elements (79 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words469
Raw Density16.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

88
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability88/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

38%
🗑️ 62%
Useful Content (27.6 KB)Bloat (45.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context81% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage44 / 54 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

60 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 62.0% · SNR: 0.61 · Signal: 7073 / Noise: 11562 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1210 ms
Raw HTML Size72.8 KB
Visible Text Size27.6 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1210 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

725
DOM nodes
73 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → http://www.emclient.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

97
internal links
20
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 70/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for emclient.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/emclient.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=emclient.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 5 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
70
Single-page score
-15
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
55
Avg across 5 pages · Range 36–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 70, but internal pages average only 55 — a -15-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
14687
Avg Bloat
48.4×
RAG Fractures
5
Ext. Citations
32
⚠️
5 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 5 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://emclient.com/faq
FAQ - Getting Started | Frequently Asked Questions | Support
pricing 77 6.7× 13091 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://emclient.com/features
Features Overview | eM Client
pricing 67 23.8× 651 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://emclient.com/blog
The Official Blog | eM Client
pricing 49 23.9× 483 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://emclient.com/pricing
Pricing | The best email client for Windows and Mac | eM Client
pricing 46 52.0× 385 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://emclient.com/case-studies
Case Studies | eM Client
pricing 36 135.4× 77 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
🔗
Outbound External Citations
32 unique external domains cited across 5 pages
youtube.com ×5
cz.emclient.com ×5
forum.emclient.com ×5
support.emclient.com ×5
it.emclient.com ×5
x.com ×5
fr.emclient.com ×5
de.emclient.com ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/emclient.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to emclient.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
emclient.com (this site) 70 90 Cloudflare Pages 2.6× 1
yemenembassy-sa.org 70 81 Cloudflare Pages 2.6× 1 Compare →
songhall.org 70 80 Cloudflare Pages 2.6× 1 Compare →
kamieniolomy.pl 70 78 Cloudflare Pages 2.6× 1 Compare →
seasia.co 70 78 Cloudflare Pages 2.6× 1 Compare →
sah11.com 70 89 Cloudflare Pages 2.5× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to emclient.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Emclient?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Emclient does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Emclient work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Emclient."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for emclient.com:

Current Score
90
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history