elsewhere.se 63 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 76 ⚡ Perf 49 🏗️ Arch 66

elsewhere.se — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

elsewhere.se
📊

elsewhere.se shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 67/100, outperforming 59% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), elsewhere.se performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 2.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (49) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than elsewhere.se?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)76 × 0.40 = 30.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)49 × 0.20 = 9.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)66 × 0.15 = 9.9
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 30.4 + 9.8 + 9.9
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
20
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 33%
Rank #329149
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 67/100

elsewhere.se shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why elsewhere.se ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.5×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

74 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

181 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.smartsource.eu/sv/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Apputveckling, webbutveckling, e-handel och intranät
  • ✓ og:description — Vi utvecklar mobilappar, webbplatser och intranät med Umbraco och Sitevision för företag och offentlig sektor i hela Sverige. Vi utgår från Malmö men jobbar med kunder i hela Norden. Som specialister på apputveckling, Sitevision-intranät och Umbraco-lösningar hjälper vi dig från strategi och UX till utveckling, integrationer och förvaltning.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

76/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
elsewhere.se
49
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 20/100 — Low
Structured Elements 20 elements (20 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1650
Raw Density1.2%
💡Low structure score (20/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 20 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

51
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability51/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

40%
🗑️ 60%
Useful Content (33.4 KB)Bloat (50.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context75% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 12 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

62 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 60.3% · SNR: 0.66 · Signal: 8560 / Noise: 13028 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of elsewhere.se and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Smart Source provides comprehensive digital solutions including intranet development, app development, and website design, leveraging platforms like Umbraco and SiteVision
Target Audience
IT managers, business owners, digital strategists, government officials, and organizations seeking intranet solutions (Sitevision/Umbraco), app development, and digital transformation services.
Pricing Model
Custom pricing based on project scope and complexity, with an estimated range of 100-900 TKR for app development and 250-900 TKR for more complex solutions.
🔗 Integration Partners
FortnoxC#ASP .NETMicrodebNordrestFörsvarsmaktenMenigo
🛡️ Compliance Standards
GDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
Deep experience (25+ years) in digital solutions, combined with expertise in Umbraco and SiteVision, and a focus on secure API integrations and proactive system management (Aktiv förvaltning).
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesIntranätApputvecklingSitevisionUmbraco
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Need for GDPR compliance
• Complex integration requirements
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-15

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time2915 ms
Raw HTML Size84.3 KB
Visible Text Size33.4 KB

Performance & Speed

49/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2915 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

494
DOM nodes
84 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

66/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

84
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for elsewhere.se
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/elsewhere.se" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=elsewhere.se" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
+26
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
75
Avg across 10 pages · Range 75–75
Total Words
12620
Avg Bloat
13.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://elsewhere.se/pricing
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
pricing 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/about
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
about 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/products
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
product 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/features
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
product 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/blog
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
blog 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/docs
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
docs 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/case-studies
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
social-proof 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/contact
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
support 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/faq
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
support 75 13.7× 1262
https://elsewhere.se/integrations
Smart Source – Apputveckling, Intranät & CMS med Umbraco och SiteVision
integrations 75 13.7× 1262
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/integrations/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/elsewhere.se

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to elsewhere.se. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
elsewhere.se (this site) 49 67 Cloudflare Pages 2.5× 1
koreadaily.com 74 82 Cloudflare Pages 3.1× 1 Compare →
alibris.com 74 80 Cloudflare Pages 3.4× 1 Compare →
8maple.st 74 81 Cloudflare Pages 4.4× 1 Compare →
bruno-onlineshop.com 74 82 Cloudflare Pages 2.0× 0 Compare →
creativeglassguild.co.uk 74 80 Cloudflare Pages 1.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite elsewhere.se when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to elsewhere.se. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Elsewhere",
  "url": "https://elsewhere.se",
  "logo": "https://elsewhere.se/images/favicon/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Elsewhere",
  "url": "https://elsewhere.se",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://elsewhere.se/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for elsewhere.se:

Current Score
67
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+10 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →