ekimemo.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 42 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 68

ekimemo.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

ekimemo.com
📊

ekimemo.com has earned a 92/100 ACRI — a tier-1 result that puts it ahead of 99% of sites in the SEODiff Radar. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 4.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The site includes 3 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (42) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than ekimemo.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)42 × 0.25 = 10.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 10.5 + 31.2 + 13.6 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
98
Structure
avg 35
86
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 48%
Rank #475589
-46 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 92/100

ekimemo.com ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 48%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ekimemo.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat4.5×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

42/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

68 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

337 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://ekimemo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 駅メモ! - ステーションメモリーズ!- 公式サイト
  • ✓ og:description — かわいい女の子たちと一緒に旅をしよう!『駅メモ! - ステーションメモリーズ!-』(略して「駅メモ!」)は端末の位置登録機能を利用して、実在する鉄道駅を集めてまわる駅収集位置ゲームです♪日本全国9100以上の駅を巡って全駅制覇を目指そう!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 98/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 33 elements (33 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words114
Raw Density29.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

96
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability96/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

22%
🗑️ 78%
Useful Content (6.7 KB)Bloat (23.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context88% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage23 / 26 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

12 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 77.5% · SNR: 0.29 · Signal: 1721 / Noise: 5943 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servergazelle
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1330 ms
Raw HTML Size29.9 KB
Visible Text Size6.7 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1330 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

326
DOM nodes
30 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

42
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 69/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ekimemo.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ekimemo.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ekimemo.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ekimemo.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ekimemo.com (this site) 69 92 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 3
wurth.nl 69 77 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 3 Compare →
accommodationla.com 69 72 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 3 Compare →
silvretta-montafon.at 69 78 Custom / Proprietary 4.3× 3 Compare →
wantedinrome.com 69 77 Custom / Proprietary 4.7× 3 Compare →
forum-info.ru 69 79 Custom / Proprietary 4.7× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ekimemo.com:

Current Score
92
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history