eclipse.org 68 C
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 74

eclipse.org — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

eclipse.org
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for eclipse.org is strong: an ACRI of 81/100 places it ahead of 95% of domains in the index. Within the developer vertical, this places eclipse.org above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. Token bloat registers at 6.7× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 12 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than eclipse.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)74 × 0.15 = 11.1
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 33.2 + 13.6 + 11.1
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
83
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
90
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #4549
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 5%
Score 81/100

eclipse.org has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why eclipse.org ranks here

Tech stackHugo
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat6.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

45 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

160 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 23
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.eclipse.org
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Eclipse Foundation | Powering Open Innovation
  • ✓ og:description — The Eclipse Foundation hosts 400+ open source projects with vendor-neutral governance, enabling global collaboration in automotive, IoT, cloud, and emerging …
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
eclipse.org
64
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 83/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 183 elements (183 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words878
Raw Density20.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

65
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability65/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (6.2 KB)Bloat (35.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context25% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 25% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.0% · SNR: 0.18 · Signal: 1588 / Noise: 8994 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkHugo
AI-Readiness Score90/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1058 ms
Raw HTML Size41.3 KB
Visible Text Size6.2 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1058 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

782
DOM nodes
41 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, max-age=8m, no-transform
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

74/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

140
internal links
17
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for eclipse.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/eclipse.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=eclipse.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 525 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
-1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 525 pages · Range 32–82
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
501688
Avg Bloat
31.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
61
⚠️
61 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 61 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.eclipse.org/org/foundation/annual-reports/2013/
2013 Annual Community Report | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.5× 3557 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/sparkplug/charter/
Sparkplug Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.7× 2910 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/polarsys/charter/
Polarsys Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.1× 4192 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/osgi/charter/
OSGi Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.8× 2805 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/openmdm/charter/
OpenMDM Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 2.9× 4592 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/tangle-ee/charter/
Tangle EE Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 4.6× 2079 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/openhw-europe/charter/
OpenHW Europe Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
other 82 4.9× 1862
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/openadx/charter/
OpenADx Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 4.5× 2150 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/openvsx/charter/
Open VSX Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 4.4× 2157 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/open-regulatory-compliance/charter/
Open Regulatory Compliance Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.3× 3607 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/oniro/charter/
Oniro Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.1× 4083 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/microprofile/charter/
MicroProfile Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 4.5× 2189 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/sdv/charter/
Eclipse Software Defined Vehicle Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.0× 4404 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/papyrusic/charter/
Eclipse Papyrus Industry Consortium Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.9× 2886 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/osbea/charter/
Eclipse OS.bea Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 4.6× 2072 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/openpass/charter/
Eclipse OpenPASS Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.0× 4263 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/eclipse-iot/charter/
Eclipse IoT Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.7× 2920 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/eclipse-ide/charter/
Eclipse IDE Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.7× 3053 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/working-groups/jakarta-ee/charter/
Jakarta EE Working Group Charter | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 3.7× 2969 💰 Pricing
https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/writing-style-guide/
Eclipse Foundation Writing Style Guide | The Eclipse Foundation
pricing 82 2.8× 5693 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/membership/ 230 66 0% 15.0× High JS Bloat
/org/ 167 68 0% 17.6× High JS Bloat
/research/ 38 58 0% 20.0× High JS Bloat
/legal/ 28 59 0% 35.8× High JS Bloat
/topics/ 7 53 0% 34.0× High JS Bloat
/collaborations/ 5 65 0% 25.7× High JS Bloat
/europe/ 3 79 0% 4.9× Healthy
/contribute/ 3 62 0% 14.9× High JS Bloat
/os4biz/ 3 54 0% 28.6× High JS Bloat
/security/ 3 65 0% 17.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 57 0% 16.5× High JS Bloat
/projects/ 2 47 0% 38.1× High JS Bloat
/specifications/ 1 57 0% 18.1× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 1 57 0% 16.5× High JS Bloat
/documentation/ 1 42 0% 54.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 525 pages
events.eclipse.org ×398
facebook.com ×391
projects.eclipse.org ×382
linkedin.com ×374
youtube.com ×367
blogs.eclipse.org ×367
newsroom.eclipse.org ×358
ocxconf.org ×334
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/eclipse.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to eclipse.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
eclipse.org (this site) 64 81 Hugo 6.7× 0
xn--80aefbvrodbz.xn--p1ai 82 90 WordPress 7.9× 1 Compare →
gillmarine.com 82 84 WordPress 2.9× 1 Compare →
jitterbit.net 82 89 WordPress 2.7× 1 Compare →
fastpng.com 84 90 WordPress 3.9× 2 Compare →
neweracap.com 82 89 Shopify 2.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

57
Homepage ACRI
55
Inner Avg ACRI
+2
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
4%
Inner Avg Ghost
23
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
41 60% pricing https://www.eclipse.org/articles/
52 0% blog https://www.eclipse.org/projects/resources/
77 0% blog https://www.eclipse.org/topics/ide/articles/how-lonti-created-a-unified-ide-for-apis-automation-and-application-development-with-eclipse-theia/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

70 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

364
Total Links
70
Unique Domains
24.3
Avg/Page
19%
Diversity
facebook.com linkedin.com marketplace.eclipse.org youtube.com blogs.eclipse.org events.eclipse.org github.com status.eclipse.org accounts.eclipse.org dataspace.eclipse.org
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 35.0

AI trust scores for the domains eclipse.org links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to eclipse.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Eclipse",
  "url": "https://eclipse.org",
  "logo": "https://eclipse.org/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Eclipse",
  "url": "https://eclipse.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://eclipse.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Eclipse?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Eclipse does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Eclipse work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Eclipse."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for eclipse.org:

Current Score
81
Projected Score
97
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history