druva.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 96

druva.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

druva.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for druva.com is strong: an ACRI of 80/100 places it ahead of 94% of domains in the index. Within the healthcare vertical, this places druva.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A 5.8× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than druva.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)96 × 0.15 = 14.4
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 33.6 + 9.4 + 14.4
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
68
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #14381
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

druva.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why druva.com ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

57 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

164 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.druva.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Data Security Cloud | Fully Managed SaaS Platform | Druva
  • ✓ og:description — Druva’s cloud-native SaaS platform delivers data security, rapid ransomware recovery, backup protection, & is AI-powered for total cyber resilience. Try it today!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, agedcarefind.com.au (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
druva.com
66
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. agedcarefind.com.au has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 68/100 — Good
Structured Elements 233 elements (233 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1671
Raw Density13.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

73
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability73/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

17%
🗑️ 83%
Useful Content (37.6 KB)Bloat (179.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context75% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage33 / 44 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 82.7% · SNR: 0.21 · Signal: 9625 / Noise: 45895 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1229 ms
Raw HTML Size216.9 KB
Visible Text Size37.6 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1229 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1450
DOM nodes
217 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=300, stale-while-revalidate=600, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

96/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.druva.com/page-sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

254
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 66/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for druva.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/druva.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=druva.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 5 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
66
Single-page score
-14
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
53
Avg across 5 pages · Range 26–72
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 66, but internal pages average only 53 — a -14-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1872
Avg Bloat
271.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://druva.com/about
About Druva: Our History of Innovations, Mission, & More | Druva
pricing 72 48.4× 750 💰 Pricing
https://druva.com/products
Data Security Solution in a SaaS-First Platform | Druva
pricing 72 48.6× 906 💰 Pricing
https://druva.com/case-studies
Protecting Customer Data | Druva Customer Success Stories | Druva
pricing 49 257.5× 117 💰 Pricing
https://druva.com/contact
Contact Us | Druva
pricing 44 495.1× 52 💰 Pricing
https://druva.com/blog
Data Protection & Cloud Technology Blog | Articles by Druva | Druva
pricing 26 508.3× 47 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 72 0% 48.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 72 0% 48.6× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 49 0% 257.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 495.1× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 26 0% 508.3× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 5 pages
security.druva.com ×5
instagram.com ×5
facebook.com ×5
linkedin.com ×5
ransomwarerecovery.org ×5
msplogin.druva.com ×5
partnerportal.druva.com ×5
x.com ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/druva.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to druva.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
druva.com (this site) 66 80 Express 5.8× 1
welnia.com 80 87 Express 5.3× 3 Compare →
farmaciasvivo.com 81 87 Express 3.1× 2 Compare →
metro.com 82 87 Express 4.1× 3 Compare →
adelaideaccountant.com 86 87 Express 5.1× 4 Compare →
dentistfind.com.au 86 87 Express 5.0× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

F 5 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

72
Homepage ACRI
48
Inner Avg ACRI
+24
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
35%
Inner Avg Ghost
72
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
26 40% pricing https://druva.com/blog
49 40% pricing https://druva.com/case-studies
44 40% pricing https://druva.com/contact
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

14 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

54
Total Links
14
Unique Domains
10.8
Avg/Page
26%
Diversity
security.druva.com linkedin.com facebook.com instagram.com x.com login.druva.com partneracademy.druva.com msplogin.druva.com ransomwarerecovery.org partnerportal.druva.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 40.6

AI trust scores for the domains druva.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to druva.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Druva",
  "url": "https://druva.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://druva.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Druva?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Druva does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Druva work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Druva."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for druva.com:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history