direngrey.co.jp 60 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 46 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 60

direngrey.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

direngrey.co.jp
📊

With a 53/100 ACRI, direngrey.co.jp has a moderate AI visibility profile — functional but not yet optimized for AI crawlers. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 15% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. The 10.0× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Some AI crawlers are permitted while others are blocked — a mixed robots.txt policy that limits visibility in certain AI ecosystems.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but AI Readiness (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 2, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 2
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than direngrey.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)46 × 0.40 = 18.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)60 × 0.15 = 9.0
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 18.4 + 16.0 + 9.0
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
60
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #836728
-25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 58%
Score 53/100

direngrey.co.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 58%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why direngrey.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat10.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

25 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

118 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.direngrey.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
  • ✓ og:description — Japanese Rock Band, DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL WEB SITE. LATEST NEWS, TOUR, RELEASE, BIOGRAPHY, FAN CLUB, MOBILE, and STORE.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

46/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words20
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Very little extractable text detected (20 words). AI crawlers may be blocked from accessing the real page content — check the Ghost Ratio and Bot Access sections.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

44
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Medium
Blocklist Risk
Extractability44/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskMedium — 2 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (831 B)Bloat (7.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio10.0× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 90.0% · SNR: 0.11 · Signal: 207 / Noise: 1869 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time743 ms
Raw HTML Size8.1 KB
Visible Text Size831 B

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

743 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

47
DOM nodes
8 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

60/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.direngrey.co.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
0
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 25/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for direngrey.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/direngrey.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=direngrey.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
25
Single-page score
+3
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
28
Avg across 10 pages · Range 28–28
Total Words
100
Avg Bloat
166.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://direngrey.co.jp/pricing
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
pricing 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/about
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
about 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/products
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
product 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/features
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
product 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/docs
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
docs 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/blog
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
blog 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/case-studies
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
social-proof 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/integrations
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
integrations 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/contact
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
support 28 166.1× 10
https://direngrey.co.jp/faq
DIR EN GREY OFFICIAL SITE
support 28 166.1× 10
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 28 1% 166.1× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/direngrey.co.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to direngrey.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
direngrey.co.jp (this site) 25 53 Custom / Proprietary 10.0× 1
status.sentral.com.au 35 59 Custom / Proprietary 8.9× 0 Compare →
do.kubsau.ru 35 63 Custom / Proprietary 7.9× 0 Compare →
statelocalgov.net 35 59 Custom / Proprietary 12.2× 2 Compare →
pinaydeepweb.com 35 64 Custom / Proprietary 5.8× 0 Compare →
ligaram-me.com 35 63 Custom / Proprietary 5.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite direngrey.co.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to direngrey.co.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for direngrey.co.jp:

Current Score
53
Projected Score
64
Improvement
+11 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history