dext.com 57 D
🛡️ SEO 64 🤖 GEO 58 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 80

dext.com — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

dext.com
📊

With a solid 75/100 ACRI, dext.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 81% of sites in the Radar. In the developer sector, dext.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 28.6× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. With 7 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (28) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (29×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 3, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than dext.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)64 × 0.25 = 16.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)58 × 0.40 = 23.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 16.0 + 23.2 + 5.6 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 36
54
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #67030
+13 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

dext.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why dext.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage7 blocks
Token bloat28.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

64/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

55 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

102 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 24
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://dext.com/ca
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Online Bookkeeping Software for Small Businesses
  • ✓ og:description — Dext is the leading bookkeeping automation platform that extracts expense data with over 99% accuracy.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

58/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
dext.com
52
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 99 elements (99 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words5392
Raw Density1.8%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 99 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks7 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (33.0 KB)Bloat (909.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio28.6× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context23% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage14 / 60 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 942.1 KB, but only 33.0 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (28.6×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 23% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.5% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 8435 / Noise: 232735 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of dext.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Mazars leverages Dext to streamline data entry and expense management for clients across its global network, enabling faster reporting and
Target Audience
Accountants, audit professionals, financial advisors, and business owners in various industries seeking to automate data capture, improve efficiency, and enhance client onboarding.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with pricing likely tiered based on usage and features, but specific details are not provided.
🔗 Integration Partners
Dext
🏆 Competitive Moat
Global scalability and integration capabilities combined with a comprehensive data capture and processing solution, addressing a key pain point for large, international accounting firms.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Large amounts of data entry
• Coding invoices
• Building individual reports
• Delays in receiving invoices
• Manual data verification
• Lack of standardized data input processes
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-03-03 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerAmazonS3
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1031 ms
Raw HTML Size942.1 KB
Visible Text Size33.0 KB

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1031 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3928
DOM nodes
942 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private,no-cache,no-store,max-age=0,must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://dext.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

132
internal links
19
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-CA
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for dext.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/dext.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=dext.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 53 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
+7
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 53 pages · Range 23–82
Topical Cohesion
18%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
42734
Avg Bloat
69.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
53
⚠️
53 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 53 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/mazars-and-dext-prepare-a-strategic-approach-to-global-efficiency
Mazars and Dext: A Strategic Approach to Global Efficiency | Dext
pricing 82 9.5× 2612 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/bas-balances-and-dext-four-times-more-clients-and-better-life-quality
Bas & Balances and Dext: Four Times More Clients and Better Life Quality | Dext
pricing 72 13.5× 1588 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/how-dext-helped-avail-cpa-transform-its-bookkeeping-business
How Dext helped Avail CPA transform its bookkeeping business | Dext
pricing 72 14.4× 1407 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/how-6dt-consulting-powers-growth-with-virtual-cfo-and-bookkeeping-services
How 6DT Consulting Powers Growth with Virtual CFO and Bookkeeping Services | Dext
pricing 72 13.5× 1534 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/bright-shift-discovers-the-bright-side-of-accounting-with-dext-prepare
Bright/Shift Discovers the Bright Side of Accounting with Dext | Dext
pricing 69 17.6× 1220 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/financial-management-guide-for-hospitality-businesses
Financial management guide for hospitality businesses | Dext
pricing 69 18.8× 1107 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/how-creative-cfo-scaled-smarter-with-dexts-bookkeeping-platform
How Creative CFO scaled smarter with Dext’s bookkeeping platform | Dext
pricing 69 16.3× 1313 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/how-dext-prepare-builds-streamlined-accounting-for-the-construction-industry
How Dext Builds Streamlined Accounting for the Construction Industry | Dext
pricing 69 19.4× 1110 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/optimizing-your-accounting-app-stack-for-clean-data
Optimizing Your Accounting App Stack for Clean Data | Dext
pricing 69 17.2× 1159 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/mbk-search-saves-hours-of-time-on-data-entry-with-dext-prepare
MBK Search Saves Hours of Time on Data Entry with Dext | Dext
pricing 69 17.9× 1154 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/businesses-thriving-with-dext
Businesses Thriving with Dext | Dext
pricing 69 18.1× 1090 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/how-bookkeeping-automation-can-help-you-generate-revenue
How Bookkeeping Automation Can Help You Generate Revenue | Dext
pricing 69 17.9× 1221 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/10-reasons-why-accounting-firms-choose-dext-prepare
10 Reasons Why Accounting Firms Choose Dext Bookkeeping Software | Dext
pricing 69 17.0× 1193 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/6-essential-use-cases-from-our-new-feature-practice-insights
6 Essential Use Cases From Our New Feature, Practice Insights | Dext
pricing 69 17.4× 1217 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/uk/partner/product/dext-payments/pricing
Dext Payment Parner Pricing | Dext
pricing 66 52.2× 1035 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/uk/business/product/dext-payments/pricing
Dext Payment Pricing | Dext
pricing 66 75.2× 627 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/integrations
Seamless Integrations with Major Accounting Softwares | Dext
pricing 66 49.3× 1480 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/flotek-case-study
Paperless Progress: How Dext aided Flotek’s rapid expansion | Dext
pricing 64 26.4× 781 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/balancing-automation-and-personal-touch-in-ai-driven-accounting
Balancing Automation and Personal Touch in AI-Driven Accounting | Dext
pricing 64 22.7× 888 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://dext.com/en/blog/single/enhanced-expense-management-all-in-one-place
Enhanced expense management, all in one place | Dext
pricing 64 27.7× 768 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 53 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/en/ 37 62 0% 43.9× High JS Bloat
/uk/ 4 61 1% 70.3× Bot Blocked
/us/ 2 56 1% 76.6× Bot Blocked
/za/ 2 55 1% 67.4× Bot Blocked
/cafr/ 2 35 1% 516.9× Bot Blocked
/au/ 2 56 1% 76.6× Bot Blocked
/ca/ 2 56 1% 76.6× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 66 1% 49.3× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 46 0% 80.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 53 pages
facebook.com ×53
linkedin.com ×53
youtube.com ×53
x.com ×53
instagram.com ×53
apps.apple.com ×53
play.google.com ×53
help.dext.com ×53
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/dext.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to dext.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
dext.com (this site) 52 75 Next.js 28.6× 7
dp.toys 77 88 Next.js 9.1× 2 Compare →
unitedsport.ca 77 88 Next.js 9.1× 2 Compare →
blog.amarr.com 77 89 Next.js 4.7× 24 Compare →
docs.ebpf.io 77 82 Next.js 2.0× 0 Compare →
honeybros.com 77 95 WordPress 18.2× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite dext.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to dext.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Dext",
  "url": "https://dext.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://dext.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for dext.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+9 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history