cykelpartner.dk 70 B
🛡️ SEO 55 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 89
Radar → Domains → cykelpartner.dk

cykelpartner.dk — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

cykelpartner.dk
📊

cykelpartner.dk demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 85/100 — placing it in the top 98% of all indexed domains. Within the ecommerce vertical, this places cykelpartner.dk above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 15% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. Token bloat registers at 9.1× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (55) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
55
🛡️ Traditional SEO
75
🤖 AI Readiness
62
⚡ Performance
89
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than cykelpartner.dk?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)55 × 0.25 = 13.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)89 × 0.15 = 13.3
Weighted sum = 13.8 + 30.0 + 12.4 + 13.3
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 42%
Rank #418380
-39 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 85/100

cykelpartner.dk ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 42%) than in AI search (Top 2%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cykelpartner.dk ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryecommerce
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat9.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other Custom / Proprietary sites → ecommerce industry → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

55/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

147 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.cykelpartner.dk/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cykelpartner.dk - cykler, udstyr & reservedele (stort udvalg)
  • ✓ og:description — Cykelpartner har et kæmpe udvalg af cykler, cykeludstyr og tilbehør - bestil online og få leveret til døren eller afhent i en af vores butikker
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, stylekorean.com (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cykelpartner.dk
60
Your ACRI Score
→
stylekorean.com
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. stylekorean.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 43 elements (43 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words133
Raw Density32.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (6.4 KB)Bloat (51.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.1× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context35% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage11 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 35% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.0% · SNR: 0.12 · Signal: 1627 / Noise: 13218 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkCustom / Proprietary
AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1374 ms
Raw HTML Size58.0 KB
Visible Text Size6.4 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1374 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

476
DOM nodes
58 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

89/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.cykelpartner.dk/resources/sitemap-da-DK.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

59
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → da
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 60/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cykelpartner.dk
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cykelpartner.dk" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cykelpartner.dk" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
60
Single-page score
+12
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
72
Avg across 1 pages · Range 72–72
Total Words
1013
Avg Bloat
16.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cykelpartner.dk/blog
Cykelpartner blog - Guides & Artikler til cyklilsten
 blog 72 16.0× 1013 ✓
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 72 0% 16.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
instagram.com ×1
youtube.com ×1
tracking.cykelpartner.dk ×1
findsmiley.dk ×1
facebook.com ×1
linkedin.com ×1
tiktok.com ×1
geardrop.dk ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cykelpartner.dk

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cykelpartner.dk. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cykelpartner.dk (this site) 60 85 Custom / Proprietary 9.1× 2 —
flinders.nl 82 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 2 Compare →
negoziodelvino.it 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 2 Compare →
epic7db.com 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 2 Compare →
mil-freaks.com 82 84 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 1 Compare →
bestcarton.com 85 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cykelpartner.dk:

Current Score
85
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+3 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.