curama.jp 55 D
🛡️ SEO 13 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 69

curama.jp — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

curama.jp
📊

With a solid 80/100 ACRI, curama.jp is well-positioned for AI search — better than 94% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, curama.jp outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 2.9× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (13) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than curama.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)13 × 0.25 = 3.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)69 × 0.15 = 10.3
Weighted sum = 3.2 + 34.0 + 7.8 + 10.3
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #67056
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

curama.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why curama.jp ranks here

Tech stackExpress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

13/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

75 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

335 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://curama.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — くらしのマーケット - くらべておトク、プロのお仕事。
  • ✓ og:description — ハウスクリーニングや家事代行、不用品回収、引越しなどの暮らしのサービスをオンラインで予約するなら「くらしのマーケット」。サービスを利用したユーザーの口コミ、満足度や具体的なサービス料金で簡単・便利に徹底比較![保証制度完備!]
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
curama.jp
69
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 404 elements (404 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words506
Raw Density79.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (159.4 KB)Bloat (297.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context97% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage37 / 38 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.1% · SNR: 0.54 · Signal: 40802 / Noise: 76168 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1905 ms
Raw HTML Size456.9 KB
Visible Text Size159.4 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1905 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2757
DOM nodes
457 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

69/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

425
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 69/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for curama.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/curama.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=curama.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 56 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
69
Single-page score
-16
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
54
Avg across 56 pages · Range 49–65
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 69, but internal pages average only 54 — a -16-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
9907
Avg Bloat
275.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://curama.jp/water-cleaning/4set/okinawa/
沖縄県の水回りクリーニング / 4点セット (お風呂+換気扇+トイレ+キッチン)を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 65 170.5× 362 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/wallpaper/replacement/okinawa/
沖縄県の壁紙・クロスのリフォーム / 張替えを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 65 159.3× 321 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/pc-repair/okinawa/
沖縄県のパソコン修理を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 219.9× 213 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/window-cleaning/okinawa/
沖縄県の窓・サッシの掃除を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 217.1× 257 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/socket/repair/okinawa/
沖縄県の室内コンセント増設・電気スイッチの修理(交換) / 修理(交換)を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 181.2× 256 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/aircon-repair/okinawa/
沖縄県のエアコン修理を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 209.7× 220 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/internet-installation/okinawa/
沖縄県のインターネット設定を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 200.7× 242 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/screen/okinawa/
沖縄県の網戸張替えを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 196.5× 257 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/socket/extension/okinawa/
沖縄県の室内コンセント増設・電気スイッチの修理(交換) / 増設を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 194.4× 233 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/washroom/okinawa/
沖縄県の洗面所クリーニングを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 212.1× 297 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/fan/rangefood/okinawa/
沖縄県のレンジフード(換気扇)クリーニング / レンジフードタイプを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 183.0× 384 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/car-cleaning/leather/okinawa/
沖縄県の車内清掃(車内クリーニング) / レザー(革)シート車を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 202.0× 232 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/pest/cockroach-business/okinawa/
沖縄県の害虫駆除 / ゴキブリ駆除 / 店舗用(飲食店・商業施設)を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 186.2× 248 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/cameraman/traditional-shichi-go-san/okinawa/
沖縄県の出張撮影・カメラマン / 七五三を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 236.7× 257 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/magician/okinawa/
沖縄県の出張マジシャンを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 62 309.9× 239 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/landscape-fabric-installation/okinawa/
沖縄県の防草シート施工を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 52 342.1× 118 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/pest/flea-extermination/okinawa/
沖縄県の害虫駆除 / ノミ駆除を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 52 223.8× 197 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/carpet-cleaning/okinawa/
沖縄県の出張カーペットクリーニングを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 52 348.4× 117 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/tap-replacement/washroom-tap/okinawa/
沖縄県の水栓蛇口交換 / 洗面台を料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 52 225.9× 186 💰 Pricing
https://curama.jp/refrigerator-cleaning/okinawa/
沖縄県の冷蔵庫クリーニングを料金と口コミで比較!おすすめ事業者ランキング - くらしのマーケット
pricing 52 287.0× 151 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 56 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/wildlife/ 3 52 0% 238.9× High JS Bloat
/socket/ 2 62 0% 187.8× High JS Bloat
/pest/ 2 57 0% 205.0× High JS Bloat
/partition-wall/ 2 49 0% 277.8× High JS Bloat
/smartphone-repair/ 2 50 0% 258.4× High JS Bloat
/car-audio-installation/ 1 49 0% 379.1× High JS Bloat
/fan/ 1 62 0% 183.0× High JS Bloat
/bike-transport/ 1 52 0% 268.2× High JS Bloat
/housekeeping/ 1 52 0% 235.0× High JS Bloat
/office-moving/ 1 52 0% 322.6× High JS Bloat
/furniture-repair/ 1 49 0% 291.9× High JS Bloat
/water-blockage-repair/ 1 49 0% 240.2× High JS Bloat
/washroom/ 1 62 0% 212.1× High JS Bloat
/eyelash/ 1 52 0% 283.7× High JS Bloat
/floor-coating/ 1 52 0% 283.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 56 pages
instagram.com ×56
minma.jp ×56
univ.curama.jp ×56
youtube.com ×56
x.com ×56
faq.curama.jp ×56
shop.curama.jp ×56
threads.com ×56
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/curama.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to curama.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
curama.jp (this site) 69 80 Express 2.9× 0
sigmaflows.com 88 93 Express 2.3× 1 Compare →
tilibraexpress.com.br 87 87 Express 1.9× 3 Compare →
sos-ricambi.it 86 94 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
sos-accessoire.com 86 93 Express 2.5× 13 Compare →
sos-zubehoer.de 88 95 Express 2.6× 13 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite curama.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to curama.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Curama",
  "url": "https://curama.jp",
  "logo": "https://curama.jp/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Curama",
  "url": "https://curama.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://curama.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Curama?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Curama does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Curama work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Curama."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for curama.jp:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history