criteo.com 69 C
🛡️ SEO 58 🤖 GEO 81 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 85

criteo.com — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

criteo.com
📊

At 79/100, the ACRI for criteo.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), criteo.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (47) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 27 snapshots
Feb 21 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than criteo.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)58 × 0.25 = 14.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)81 × 0.40 = 32.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)85 × 0.15 = 12.8
Weighted sum = 14.5 + 32.4 + 9.4 + 12.8
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
44
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #140
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

criteo.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why criteo.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

58/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

46 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

119 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.criteo.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — The Global Commerce Media Advertising Platform
  • ✓ og:description — Make every shopping moment smarter with Ads powered by commerce AI fueled by the world’s largest set of commerce data
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

81/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
criteo.com
59
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 44/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 146 elements (146 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2504
Raw Density5.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

69
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability69/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

38%
🗑️ 62%
Useful Content (209.2 KB)Bloat (332.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context11% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage5 / 46 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 11% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

60 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 61.4% · SNR: 0.63 · Signal: 53554 / Noise: 85076 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of criteo.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Enables commerce media for marketers, media owners, and retailers through addressability, AI, and retail media solutions
Target Audience
marketers, media owners, retailers, agencies, beauty brands, travel brands, CE brands
Pricing Model
not explicitly stated
🏆 Competitive Moat
commerce-focused tech, largest commerce dataset, multi-pronged addressability strategy
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
directory listingsAPI reference docscomparison pagesglossary/dictionary pagestemplate-generated category pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No explicit pricing model
• Limited integration partners mentioned
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-27 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time555 ms
Raw HTML Size541.5 KB
Visible Text Size209.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

555 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1584
DOM nodes
542 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=86400
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

85/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.criteo.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

195
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for criteo.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/criteo.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=criteo.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1003 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
59
Single-page score
+5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 1003 pages · Range 30–75
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2119249
Avg Bloat
40.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.criteo.com/supply-partner-guidelines/
Criteo Supply Partner Guidelines | Criteo
pricing 75 13.3× 5635 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/digital-advertising-glossary/
Digital Advertising Glossary | Criteo
pricing 75 11.3× 9428 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/cross-channel-marketing-strategies-for-2026-a-practical-guide-for-small-teams/
Cross-channel marketing strategies for 2026: A practical guide for small teams | Criteo
pricing 72 18.7× 3673 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/what-the-last-ten-years-in-ad-tech-can-tell-us-about-the-next-ten-in-retail-media/
What the last ten years in ad tech can tell us about the next ten in retail media | Criteo
pricing 72 17.1× 4905 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/ultimate-guide-commerce-media/
The Ultimate Guide to Commerce Media | Criteo
pricing 72 15.9× 6209 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/retail-media-tech-for-retailers/
Retail Media Momentum Continues, But Do Retailers Have the Tech They Need? | Criteo
pricing 67 24.6× 2736 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/optimize-video-ads-youtube-facebook-twitter/
How to Optimize Your Video Ads for YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter | Criteo
pricing 67 25.9× 3115 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/criteo-accelerate-emea/
Meet the Team: Criteo Accelerate EMEA | Criteo
pricing 67 25.1× 3185 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/elena-gulotta-accelerate/
Meet the Team: Elena Gulotta, Criteo's Manager of Account Strategy at Accelerate | Criteo
pricing 67 26.0× 3064 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/yield-optimization-tips-drive-ad-revenue/
Ad Stack Hacks: 5 Yield Optimization Tips to Drive Ad Revenue | Criteo
pricing 67 24.4× 2755 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/one-retargeter-vs-two/
Why you should only use one retargeter | Criteo
pricing 67 21.2× 3808 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/7-steps-how-to-market-your-business-2025/
How to market your business in 2025: 7 steps that actually work | Criteo
pricing 67 21.2× 3860 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/10-trends-shaping-the-retail-media-market/
10 Trends Shaping the Retail Media Market | Criteo
pricing 67 21.3× 3850 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/ctv-ott-video-advertising-guide/
CTV & OTT Advertising Guide: 5 Big Challenges Solved | Criteo
pricing 67 24.4× 3326 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/5-ways-to-extend-your-digital-advertising/
5 Ways to Extend Your Digital Advertising on the Open Internet | Criteo
pricing 67 26.9× 2966 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/how-to-increase-roas/
How to increase ROAS: 4 ways to optimize your ad spend today | Criteo
pricing 67 26.6× 3017 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/the-future-of-commerce-recommendation-why-hybrid-systems-will-win/
The Future of Commerce Recommendation: Why Hybrid Systems Will Win | Criteo
pricing 67 20.1× 4151 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/first-party-data-strategy-blueprint-for-marketers/
First-Party Data Strategy: A Blueprint for Marketers
pricing 67 23.4× 3464 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/getting-ahead-of-addressability-3-campaigns-to-test-now/
Getting Ahead of Addressability: 3 Ad Campaigns to Test Now | Criteo
pricing 67 25.2× 3218 💰 Pricing
https://www.criteo.com/blog/privacy-sandbox-testing-results-show-shortfalls-to-meet-cma-requirements/
Privacy Sandbox Testing Results Show Shortfalls to Meet CMA Requirements | Criteo
pricing 67 27.0× 2987 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/success-stories/ 293 64 0% 41.3× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 97 65 0% 36.5× High JS Bloat
/resources/ 65 64 0% 51.4× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 18 64 0% 45.7× High JS Bloat
/company/ 11 64 0% 51.1× High JS Bloat
/platform/ 5 64 0% 42.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 2 64 0% 42.9× High JS Bloat
/advertising-guidelines/ 1 67 0% 26.2× High JS Bloat
/ultimate-guide-commerce-media/ 1 72 0% 15.9× High JS Bloat
/technology/ 1 64 0% 52.7× High JS Bloat
/industry/ 1 64 0% 36.9× High JS Bloat
/digital-advertising-glossary/ 1 75 0% 11.3× High JS Bloat
/business/ 1 64 0% 44.1× High JS Bloat
/supply-partner-guidelines/ 1 75 0% 13.3× High JS Bloat
/trust-center/ 1 64 0% 54.9× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/criteo.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to criteo.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
criteo.com (this site) 59 79 WordPress 2.6× 1
tissus-price.com 84 90 WordPress 2.7× 5 Compare →
aboutnurseassistantjobs.com 84 91 WordPress 5.5× 4 Compare →
aboutams.com 84 92 WordPress 4.2× 8 Compare →
motocare.co.in 84 91 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 1 Compare →
goiasatacado.com.br 84 92 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

64
Homepage ACRI
64
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
64 40% pricing https://criteo.com/products
64 40% pricing https://criteo.com/blog
64 40% pricing https://criteo.com/case-studies
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: Elizabeth Kim, Gabriele Dane, Ann Pyle
🔗

Citation Profile

24 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

173
Total Links
24
Unique Domains
11.5
Avg/Page
14%
Diversity
linkedin.com twitter.com developers.criteo.com academy.criteo.com tree-nation.com youtube.com facebook.com criteo.investorroom.com careers.criteo.com experiences.criteo.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 37.9

AI trust scores for the domains criteo.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to criteo.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Criteo",
  "url": "https://criteo.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://criteo.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Criteo?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Criteo does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Criteo work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Criteo."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for criteo.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history