craft.do 64 C
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 82

craft.do — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

craft.do
📊

craft.do shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 82/100, outperforming 96% of indexed domains. Within the education vertical, this places craft.do above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (448×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 2, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than craft.do?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 26.0 + 6.8 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
39
Structure
avg 36
82
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #32257
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 4%
Score 82/100

craft.do has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why craft.do ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industryeducation
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

31 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

70 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.craft.do
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Craft — Docs and Notes Editor
  • ✓ og:description — A premium writing experience that follows you across all your devices.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the education sector, rndirectors.com (ACRI: 85) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
craft.do
56
Your ACRI Score
85
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. rndirectors.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 39/100 — Low
Structured Elements 61 elements (61 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1303
Raw Density4.7%
💡Low structure score (39/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 61 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

57
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability57/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (8.0 KB)Bloat (3585.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context96% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage154 / 161 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 3593.9 KB, but only 8.0 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.8% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 2054 / Noise: 917975 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of craft.do and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Craft is a writing and thinking tool designed to help users capture their ideas and express themselves with joy and
Target Audience
Writers, thinkers, innovators, content creators, and anyone seeking a more enjoyable and productive writing experience.
Pricing Model
Freemium - Free plan with limited features, paid plans (Craft Plus and Family) starting at $9/month.
🔗 Integration Partners
MessengerWhatsAppInstagram
🏆 Competitive Moat
Focus on user experience and emotional connection with the tool, creating a delightful and empowering writing environment, differentiating it from frustrating and complex productivity tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Frustrating text editors with excessive noise and difficult-to-control output
• Lack of control over digital identity and poor presentation of content
• Complex and bloated tools that distract and hinder productivity
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1486 ms
Raw HTML Size3593.9 KB
Visible Text Size8.0 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1486 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2490
DOM nodes
3594 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.craft.do/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

99
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for craft.do
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/craft.do" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=craft.do" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 90 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
52
Avg across 90 pages · Range 40–60
Topical Cohesion
11%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
37712
Avg Bloat
359.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
89
⚠️
89 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 89 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.craft.do/imagine/guide/api/v0
Build with Craft API on v0
pricing 60 168.4× 504 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/fr/imagine/guide/api/replit
Construire avec Craft API sur Replit
pricing 60 173.1× 575 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/fr/imagine/guide/api/bolt
Construire avec Craft API sur Bolt
pricing 60 176.4× 564 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/fr/imagine/guide/api/shortcuts
Construire avec Craft API sur Apple Shortcuts
pricing 60 171.5× 582 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/fr/imagine/guide/api/lovable
Construire avec Craft API sur Lovable
pricing 60 177.1× 561 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/es/imagine/guide/api/v0
Usa la API de Craft con v0
pricing 60 165.3× 533 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/de/imagine/guide/api/v0
Build with Craft API on v0
pricing 60 172.7× 504 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/de/imagine/guide/api/replit
Build with Craft API on Replit
pricing 60 169.6× 514 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/de/imagine/guide/api/shortcuts
Build with Craft API on Apple Shortcuts
pricing 60 170.1× 514 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/es/imagine/guide/api/api
Usa la API de Craft con Otras herramientas
pricing 60 171.6× 507 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/es/imagine/guide/api/bolt
Usa la API de Craft con Bolt
pricing 60 169.0× 522 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/es/imagine/guide/api/replit
Usa la API de Craft con Replit
pricing 60 162.5× 543 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/es/imagine/guide/api/lovable
Usa la API de Craft con Lovable
pricing 60 170.6× 516 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/es/imagine/guide/api/shortcuts
Usa la API de Craft con Apple Shortcuts
pricing 60 164.7× 537 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/it/imagine/guide/api/v0
Build with Craft API on v0
pricing 60 167.9× 514 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/it/imagine/guide/api/bolt
Build with Craft API on Bolt
pricing 60 170.4× 507 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/it/imagine/guide/api/shortcuts
Build with Craft API on Apple Shortcuts
pricing 60 167.3× 518 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/it/imagine/guide/api/lovable
Build with Craft API on Lovable
pricing 60 170.8× 505 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/it/imagine/guide/api/replit
Build with Craft API on Replit
pricing 60 165.0× 524 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.craft.do/vi/imagine/guide/api/api
Sử dụng API của Craft với Các công cụ khác
pricing 60 142.2× 654 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 90 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/ko/ 9 50 1% 274.9× Bot Blocked
/de/ 9 53 1% 225.4× Bot Blocked
/vi/ 9 59 1% 170.9× Bot Blocked
/ja/ 9 40 1% 1016.6× Bot Blocked
/zh-CN/ 9 40 1% 610.0× Bot Blocked
/es/ 9 57 1% 210.2× Bot Blocked
/zh-TW/ 9 49 1% 428.4× Bot Blocked
/it/ 9 56 1% 209.0× Bot Blocked
/imagine/ 8 54 1% 171.4× Bot Blocked
/fr/ 6 58 1% 234.1× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 2 54 0% 555.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 60 1% 62.6× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 60 1% 87.5× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 90 pages
docs.craft.do ×90
x.com ×90
play.google.com ×90
instagram.com ×90
youtube.com ×90
support.craft.do ×90
res.craft.do ×90
apps.apple.com ×90
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/craft.do

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar education Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to craft.do. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
craft.do (this site) 56 82 Next.js 447.9× 1
starkstate.edu 79 88 WordPress 6.4× 1 Compare →
king.edu 79 87 WordPress 3.8× 1 Compare →
lsusports.net 79 84 WordPress 2.8× 1 Compare →
house.hackers.com 80 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 1 Compare →
nashvillerotary.org 80 84 WordPress 3.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite craft.do when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to craft.do. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Craft?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Craft does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Craft work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Craft."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for craft.do:

Current Score
82
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history