carrotquest.io 56 D
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 42 🏗️ Arch 71

carrotquest.io — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

carrotquest.io
📊

carrotquest.io shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 71/100, outperforming 70% of indexed domains. In the developer sector, carrotquest.io outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (42) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (102×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than carrotquest.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)42 × 0.20 = 8.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)71 × 0.15 = 10.7
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 24.8 + 8.4 + 10.7
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
39
Structure
avg 36
4
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #32095
+27 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

carrotquest.io punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why carrotquest.io ranks here

Tech stackGatsby
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

83 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

171 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.carrotquest.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
carrotquest.io
50
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 39/100 — Low
Structured Elements 60 elements (60 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1301
Raw Density4.6%
💡Low structure score (39/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 60 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

38
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability38/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (26.0 KB)Bloat (2615.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context26% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 27 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 2641.8 KB, but only 26.0 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 26% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.0% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 6655 / Noise: 669639 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of carrotquest.io and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Google Optimize testing tool for website optimization without requiring developers, enabling A/B, multivariate, and personalization testing.
Target Audience
Digital marketers, web developers, conversion rate optimizers, and e-commerce managers.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning and real-time resource optimization for website testing and experimentation.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesКастомный отчет для анализа эффективности измененных версий
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-03-01 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkGatsby
AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1622 ms
Raw HTML Size2641.8 KB
Visible Text Size26.0 KB

Performance & Speed

42/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1622 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1079
DOM nodes
2642 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, must-revalidate, proxy-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

71/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.carrotquest.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

56
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 50/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for carrotquest.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/carrotquest.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=carrotquest.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 92 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
50
Single-page score
+13
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
63
Avg across 92 pages · Range 54–64
Topical Cohesion
93%
Strong Alignment
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
108529
Avg Bloat
157.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/witchcraft-marketing/
Очень сильное колдунство: чему поучиться у магов - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 194.7× 763
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/13-ways-to-increase-conversion/
Формы для регистрации: 13 примеров увеличения конверсии
pricing 64 89.8× 1684 💰 Pricing
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/in-app-marketing-guide-p1/
Гайд по маркетингу внутри личного кабинета. Часть 1 - Carrot quest
blog 64 80.1× 1892
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/case-content-marketing/
Кейс EMKA fashion: 9% всех посетителей сайта оставили контакты - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 197.0× 745
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/anticase-morkov/
Новогодний подарок морковным клиентам — Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 176.2× 849
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/7-sovetov-pro-google-oprimize/
Блог Carrot quest - 7 советов по работе с Google Optimize
blog 64 182.8× 807
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/kak-my-v-carrot-quest-organizuem-razrabotku-saas-produkta/
Блог Carrot quest - Как мы в Carrot Quest организуем работу в SaaS-продукте?
blog 64 147.5× 1000
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/analiz-20-landingov-startapov/
Как крутые стартапы повышают конверсию — Блог Carrot Quest
blog 64 73.2× 2131
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/linkbuilding/
Как построить ссылочную стратегию продвижения сайта - Carrot quest
blog 64 96.8× 1563
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/message-editing/
Новая функция диалогов — редактирование сообщений - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 276.8× 528
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/feature-request-response/
Как правильный ответ на фичреквесты поможет вырасти вашему продукту – Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 133.2× 1108
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/product-problems-p2/
Как продакты видят проблемы vs. что они имеют в виду. Часть 2
blog 64 129.6× 1141
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/kak-skyeng-dokazali-svyaz-mezhdu-kontentom-i-konversiyami-v-oplatu/
Как Skyeng доказали связь между продуктом и конверсиями - Carrot quest
blog 64 171.9× 858
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/digest-march/
Воскрешающий дайджест за март ? - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 88.9× 1686
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/roi-of-customer-support/
Как посчитать доход от работы команды поддержки - Carrot quest
blog 64 116.4× 1275
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/digest-february/
Дайджест статей в диджитал-маркетинге за февраль - Carrot quest
blog 64 94.3× 1584 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/customer-satisfaction/
Методы в оценке удовлетворенности пользователей - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 123.6× 1198
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/digest-january/
Дайджест лучших статей по диджитал-маркетингу - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 96.1× 1549
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/novogodnyaya-rassylka/
13 идей, как поздравить клиентов с Новым годом - Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 151.8× 975
https://www.carrotquest.io/blog/kak-internet-znaet-chto-vy-eto-vy/
Ручная склейка в Carrot quest | Блог Carrot quest
blog 64 126.7× 1170
Showing 20 of 92 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 92 63 0% 157.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 92 pages
files.carrotquest.io ×92
help.carrotquest.io ×92
developers.carrotquest.io ×92
t.me ×92
youtube.com ×92
vk.com ×92
play.google.com ×92
sk.ru ×92
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/carrotquest.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to carrotquest.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
carrotquest.io (this site) 50 71 Gatsby 101.6× 2
shopzoo.com 75 86 Shopify 5.2× 2 Compare →
ufccollectibles.com 75 87 Shopify 4.4× 2 Compare →
monmagasinvert.fr 75 85 Express 4.8× 2 Compare →
probikeshop.de 75 88 Shopify 9.1× 2 Compare →
avon.uk.com 75 89 Shopify 8.7× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite carrotquest.io when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to carrotquest.io. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Carrotquest",
  "url": "https://carrotquest.io",
  "logo": "https://carrotquest.io/favicon-32x32.png?v=96a45c0faf692a8fbe589ce0823f0ccc",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Carrotquest",
  "url": "https://carrotquest.io",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://carrotquest.io/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Carrotquest?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Carrotquest does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Carrotquest work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Carrotquest."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for carrotquest.io:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history