browserstack.com 62 C
🛡️ SEO 47 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 98

browserstack.com — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

browserstack.com
📊

browserstack.com achieves a 76/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. In the developer sector, browserstack.com outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Token bloat registers at 5.8× — acceptable, but reducing inline scripts and redundant markup could yield measurable gains. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 23 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than browserstack.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)47 × 0.25 = 11.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)98 × 0.15 = 14.7
Weighted sum = 11.8 + 29.2 + 6.8 + 14.7
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
29
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.9%
Rank #8557
+17 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

browserstack.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why browserstack.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat5.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

47/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

65 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

167 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 3
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.browserstack.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Most Reliable App & Cross Browser Testing Platform
  • ✓ og:description — Instant access to 3000+ browsers and real iOS and Android devices for cross browser testing. Ship apps and websites that work for everyone, every time. Get Free Trial.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
browserstack.com
52
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 29/100 — Low
Structured Elements 155 elements (155 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words5962
Raw Density2.6%
💡Low structure score (29/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 155 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

61
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability61/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

17%
🗑️ 83%
Useful Content (116.0 KB)Bloat (556.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio5.8× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context91% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage115 / 127 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 82.7% · SNR: 0.21 · Signal: 29705 / Noise: 142449 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of browserstack.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides automated testing for web applications, specifically focusing on file download functionality using Selenium and BrowserStack's custom
Target Audience
Software developers, QA engineers, automation testers, DevOps engineers
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with tiered plans based on usage and features (details not specified in text).
🔗 Integration Partners
BrowserStack
🏆 Competitive Moat
BrowserStack's custom executors and integration with Selenium provide a unique advantage for robust file download testing, offering deeper control and validation than standard Selenium approaches.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesIntegration directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1326 ms
Raw HTML Size672.5 KB
Visible Text Size116.0 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1326 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2846
DOM nodes
672 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=86400
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

98/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.browserstack.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

295
internal links
19
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for browserstack.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/browserstack.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=browserstack.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 996 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
48
Avg across 996 pages · Range 22–74
Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
942755
Avg Bloat
68.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
892
⚠️
892 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 892 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/test-file-download
Test the file download functionality in Selenium tests | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 74 8.0× 20870 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/app-automate/api-reference/appium/sessions
Get Appium session information using App Automate API | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 15.8× 4762 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/api-reference/selenium/session
Get session details using Automate API | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 11.2× 6312 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/firefox-profile
Set Firefox profile for Selenium Tests | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 14.4× 5922 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/github-actions
Integrate your Selenium test suite with GitHub Actions | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 15.5× 4689 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/test-file-upload
Test the file upload functionality in Selenium tests | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 10.4× 10266 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/enterprise/test-insights-and-analytics
BrowserStack Test Insights | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 11.4× 4746 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/handle-permission-pop-ups
Handle pop-ups, permissions, and notifications in Selenium tests | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 10.5× 11511 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/annotations
Log contextual information using console annotations for Selenium tests | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 12.9× 6169 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/sdk/release-notes
BrowserStack SDK release notes | BrowserStack Documentation | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 11.3× 13420 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate-turboscale/api-reference/session
Get session details using Automate TurboScale API | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 19.3× 2840 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/jenkins
Integrate your Selenium test suite with Jenkins | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 14.9× 5275 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/selenium/debugging-options
Debugging options for Selenium Testing | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 13.0× 6863 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/enterprise/api-reference/users/manage
Create and manage users via API | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 64 16.8× 3327 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://browserstack.com/blog
BrowserStack Blog
pricing 64 47.6× 1104 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/playwright/playwright-capabilities
Playwright capabilities | BrowserStack Automate | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 61 18.5× 3560 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/app-automate/appium/advanced-features/adb-commands
Test using adb | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 61 16.7× 4831 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/puppeteer/devtools-recorder
Integrate Chrome DevTools Puppeteer script with BrowserStack Automate | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 61 17.1× 3829 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate/playwright/jenkins
Integrate Playwright test suite with Jenkins | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 61 19.4× 3161 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.browserstack.com/docs/app-automate/appium/test-real-user-conditions/configure-timezone
Configure device Timezone in Appium tests | BrowserStack Docs
pricing 61 19.6× 3726 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 499 55 0% 51.0× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 64 0% 47.6× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/browserstack.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to browserstack.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
browserstack.com (this site) 52 76 WordPress 5.8× 1
jysk.com.mt 77 87 WordPress 5.3× 1 Compare →
voyeglobal.com 77 80 WordPress 4.9× 2 Compare →
treasuredata.co.jp 77 88 WordPress 9.2× 1 Compare →
soen.tokyo 77 85 WordPress 5.5× 4 Compare →
reviewecon.com 77 90 WordPress 12.1× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

53
Homepage ACRI
25
Inner Avg ACRI
+28
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
68%
Inner Avg Ghost
16
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
22 70% docs https://www.browserstack.com/docs/accessibility-automation/overview
22 70% docs https://www.browserstack.com/docs/automate-turboscale/overview/what-is-automate-turboscale
22 70% docs https://www.browserstack.com/docs/accessibility/workflow-scanner/config-workflow-scan
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 0/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

9 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

12
Total Links
9
Unique Domains
0.8
Avg/Page
75%
Diversity
requestly.com status.browserstack.com nightwatchjs.org twitter.com facebook.com linkedin.com instagram.com docs.embold.io youtube.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 59.4

AI trust scores for the domains browserstack.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to browserstack.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Browserstack",
  "url": "https://browserstack.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://browserstack.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Browserstack?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Browserstack does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Browserstack work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Browserstack."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for browserstack.com:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+10 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history