batikingdom.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 62 🤖 GEO 72 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 55

batikingdom.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

batikingdom.com
📊

batikingdom.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places batikingdom.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. With a 3.7× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The site includes 3 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Architecture (55) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than batikingdom.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)62 × 0.25 = 15.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)72 × 0.40 = 28.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)55 × 0.15 = 8.2
Weighted sum = 15.5 + 28.8 + 13.6 + 8.2
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
38
Structure
avg 36
46
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 27%
Rank #272724
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

batikingdom.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why batikingdom.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat3.7×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

62/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

54 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

251 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://batikingdom.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → id
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — BATIKPOKER | Situs Game Online Lengkap & Terpercaya
  • ✓ og:description — BATIKPOKER menyediakan togel, poker, slot, dingdong, sportsbook, live casino, sabung ayam, dan arcade dengan sistem aman & fair play.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

72/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
batikingdom.com
54
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 38/100 — Low
Structured Elements 11 elements (11 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words258
Raw Density4.3%
💡Low structure score (38/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 11 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (2.3 KB)Bloat (6.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.7× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

32 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 73.0% · SNR: 0.37 · Signal: 600 / Noise: 1624 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerLiteSpeed
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1084 ms
Raw HTML Size8.7 KB
Visible Text Size2.3 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1084 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

81
DOM nodes
9 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

55/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
1
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → id
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 54/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for batikingdom.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/batikingdom.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=batikingdom.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
54
Single-page score
+26
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
80
Avg across 10 pages · Range 80–80
Total Words
2380
Avg Bloat
7.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://batikingdom.com/pricing
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
pricing 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/about
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
about 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/products
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
product 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/features
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
product 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/blog
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
blog 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/docs
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
docs 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/case-studies
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
social-proof 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/integrations
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
integrations 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/contact
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
support 80 7.5× 238
https://batikingdom.com/faq
BATIKPOKER | Situs Main Slot Ceme Online Server 98% JP
support 80 7.5× 238
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 80 0% 7.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
batikpoker.space ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/batikingdom.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to batikingdom.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
batikingdom.com (this site) 54 74 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 3
denatran.gov.br 79 84 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 3 Compare →
apoteka-online.rs 79 84 Custom / Proprietary 5.0× 3 Compare →
xn--0ck4aw2h.gamewith.jp 79 79 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 2 Compare →
goodfortune.jp 79 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 1 Compare →
ivanteevka.prostitutkimax.top 79 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.4× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to batikingdom.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Batikingdom",
  "url": "https://batikingdom.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://batikingdom.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for batikingdom.com:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+4 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history