autoc-one.jp 57 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 11 🏗️ Arch 91

autoc-one.jp — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

autoc-one.jp
📊

At 80/100, the ACRI for autoc-one.jp indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 58), autoc-one.jp performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 2.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (11) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than autoc-one.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)11 × 0.20 = 2.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)91 × 0.15 = 13.7
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 33.6 + 2.2 + 13.7
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #52188
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

autoc-one.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why autoc-one.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.8×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

52 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

292 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 10
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://autoc-one.jp
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 「行こう」を創造する。MOTA(モータ)
  • ✓ og:description — 車の見積もりや値引きなど、自動車の購入に関する最新情報満載!価格・購入サポート情報に加え、新車カタログ・中古車・自動車保険・車検・カー用品に関するコーナーも充実。車の購入ならMOTAにお任せください。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
autoc-one.jp
79
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 3581 elements (3581 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words4152
Raw Density86.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

35%
🗑️ 65%
Useful Content (259.0 KB)Bloat (475.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context87% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage124 / 142 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

55 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 64.7% · SNR: 0.54 · Signal: 66308 / Noise: 121729 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of autoc-one.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The website provides a comprehensive comparison tool for new BMW vehicles, including details on exterior, interior, and performance, with video reviews and expert opinions.
Target Audience
Automotive enthusiasts, potential BMW buyers, car collectors, and general automotive news readers.
Pricing Model
N/A - The website focuses on providing information and comparisons, not direct sales or subscriptions.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive vehicle comparisons, expert reviews, and video content provide a detailed and engaging alternative to traditional car buying research.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Vehicle comparison pagesNew car release informationVideo reviewsModel year comparisons
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited direct purchasing options
• Lack of personalized recommendations beyond vehicle comparisons
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2701 ms
Raw HTML Size734.5 KB
Visible Text Size259.0 KB

Performance & Speed

11/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2701 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

9241
DOM nodes
734 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

91/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://autoc-one.jp/sitemap_xml/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

420
internal links
21
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 79/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for autoc-one.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/autoc-one.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=autoc-one.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 48 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
79
Single-page score
-30
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 48 pages · Range 36–60
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 79, but internal pages average only 50 — a -30-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
71%
Strong Alignment
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
9417
Avg Bloat
51.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
http://autoc-one.jp/bmw/movie/
BMW 新車比較 【オートックワン】
pricing 60 42.6× 294 💰 Pricing
http://autoc-one.jp/article/
【今買うべき車はどれ?】2026年最新-自動車解説記事・レポート【MOTA】
blog 57 82.4× 356
http://autoc-one.jp/ML/movie/
マクラーレン 新車比較 【オートックワン】
pricing 57 48.3× 205 💰 Pricing
http://autoc-one.jp/alfaromeo/movie/
アルファ ロメオ 新車比較 【オートックワン】
pricing 57 43.7× 214 💰 Pricing
http://autoc-one.jp/astonmartin/movie/
アストンマーティン 新車比較 【オートックワン】
pricing 57 46.7× 214 💰 Pricing
http://autoc-one.jp/audi/movie/
アウディ 新車比較 【オートックワン】
pricing 57 45.9× 229 💰 Pricing
http://autoc-one.jp/abarth/movie/
アバルト 新車比較 【オートックワン】
pricing 57 45.9× 203 💰 Pricing
http://autoc-one.jp/honda/partner/movie/
ホンダ パートナーの動画記事一覧 【オートックワン】
integrations 50 46.4× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/BN/movie/
バーストナー 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.8× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/CL/movie/
カールソン 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.7× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/FS/movie/
フィスカー 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.7× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/GP/movie/
グンペルト 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.7× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/Infiniti_usa/movie/
米国インフィニティ 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.5× 199
http://autoc-one.jp/acura_usa/movie/
米国アキュラ 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.8× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/KO/movie/
ケーニッグゼグ 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.8× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/PA/movie/
パガーニ 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.7× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/PH/movie/
プロトン 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.7× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/RT/movie/
ロードトレック 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.8× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/SI/movie/
米国サイオン 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.8× 192
http://autoc-one.jp/UD/movie/
UDトラックス 新車比較 【オートックワン】
other 50 45.7× 192
Showing 20 of 48 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/honda/ 2 44 0% 28.3× High JS Bloat
/abarth/ 1 57 0% 45.9× High JS Bloat
/caterham/ 1 50 0% 45.8× High JS Bloat
/bertone/ 1 50 0% 45.8× High JS Bloat
/brabus/ 1 50 0% 45.7× High JS Bloat
/acura_usa/ 1 50 0% 45.8× High JS Bloat
/RT/ 1 50 0% 45.8× High JS Bloat
/autobianchi/ 1 50 0% 45.9× High JS Bloat
/birkin/ 1 50 0% 45.7× High JS Bloat
/chevrolet/ 1 47 0% 46.2× High JS Bloat
/CU/ 1 47 0% 45.6× High JS Bloat
/GO/ 1 47 0% 45.6× High JS Bloat
/bmw/ 1 60 0% 42.6× High JS Bloat
/GP/ 1 50 0% 45.7× High JS Bloat
/bmw-alpina/ 1 50 0% 45.8× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/autoc-one.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to autoc-one.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
autoc-one.jp (this site) 79 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 1
violinsetc.com 89 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 1 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
churchfind.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite autoc-one.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 48 PAGES
0%
Homepage Ghost
8%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
43%
Homepage Bloat
52%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
0%
1 pg · ACRI 60
Orphan
8%
47 pg · ACRI 50
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
40% http://autoc-one.jp/recruit/ orphan
20% http://autoc-one.jp/article/ orphan
20% http://autoc-one.jp/ML/movie/ orphan
20% http://autoc-one.jp/astonmartin/movie/ orphan
20% http://autoc-one.jp/bentley/movie/ orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

48 PAGES
83.2%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
86%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
47
Orphan Pages [?]
97.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
47 disconnected
0%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Topical Drift
2% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
98% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
http://autoc-one.jp/bmw/movie/ http://autoc-one.jp/article/ http://autoc-one.jp/abarth/movie/ http://autoc-one.jp/ML/movie/ http://autoc-one.jp/alfaromeo/movie/
⚠️
47 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.83 means the top 3 pages hoard 86% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡 Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page article, add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page movie. (Semantic Match: 45%)
📥 Orphan: http://autoc-one.jp/article/
🔗 Donor: http://autoc-one.jp/bmw/movie/ (PR: 0.8531)
Get the full link injection plan for all 47 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.83 indicates significant equity concentration — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while others receive very little link authority. AI crawlers may deprioritize pages with low internal link signals.
🗂️

Topical Authority Distribution

2 TOPICS

How this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 48 crawled pages.

amc
48 2 pgs (50%)
mota
46 2 pgs (50%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲

Semantic Density

THIN 46 TOPICS
46
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
2
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Thin
Contextual Depth
≤5 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢 amc 100% avg similarity · ACRI 47–50
  • http://autoc-one.jp/amc_jeep/movie/
  • http://autoc-one.jp/amc/movie/
🟢 mota 100% avg similarity · ACRI 36–57
  • http://autoc-one.jp/article/
  • http://autoc-one.jp/recruit/
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 2 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

1 MISSING 0% COVERAGE
🚨
Missing Core Entity — Critical
autoc-one.jp has zero JSON-LD entities declared. AI models cannot identify your brand, product, or organization in their knowledge graph. This means:
  • AI search engines will not attribute content to your brand
  • No rich snippets or knowledge panels will be generated
  • Competitor entities will fill the gap in AI responses
Fix: Add Organization or Brand JSON-LD to your homepage.
Extracted from Content (1)
📋 Declared in JSON-LD (0)
No JSON-LD entities declared
⚠️ 1 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 0 declared vs 1 extracted — 0% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to autoc-one.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Autoc-one",
  "url": "https://autoc-one.jp",
  "logo": "https://cdn.autoc-one.jp/static/common2/images/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Autoc-one?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Autoc-one does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Autoc-one work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Autoc-one."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for autoc-one.jp:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
89
Improvement
+9 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history