atlassian.com 55 D
🛡️ SEO 42 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 28 🏗️ Arch 88

atlassian.com — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

atlassian.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for atlassian.com is strong: an ACRI of 78/100 places it ahead of 89% of domains in the index. Compared to other government sites (avg score: 57), atlassian.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (28) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (65×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than atlassian.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)42 × 0.25 = 10.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)28 × 0.20 = 5.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)88 × 0.15 = 13.2
Weighted sum = 10.5 + 26.0 + 5.6 + 13.2
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
62
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #572
+11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 11%
Score 78/100

atlassian.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why atlassian.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrygovernment
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

42/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

70 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

128 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 31
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, gep.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
atlassian.com
56
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gep.com has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Drupal. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 62/100 — Good
Structured Elements 291 elements (291 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2535
Raw Density11.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (95/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (18.2 KB)Bloat (1160.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context32% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage21 / 65 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1178.5 KB, but only 18.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 32% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.5% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 4653 / Noise: 297043 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of atlassian.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Collaboration and productivity tools for teams
Target Audience
Teams and organizations of all sizes
Pricing Model
Free trials, paid subscriptions, enterprise solutions
🔗 Integration Partners
SalesforceSlackMarketplace apps
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC2GDPR
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-25 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerAtlassianEdge
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1358 ms
Raw HTML Size1178.5 KB
Visible Text Size18.2 KB

Performance & Speed

28/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1358 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3968
DOM nodes
1178 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, s-maxage=1200, stale-while-revalidate=1200, stale-if-error=1200, no-cache="Set-Cookie"
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

88/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.atlassian.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

323
internal links
2
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for atlassian.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/atlassian.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=atlassian.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to atlassian.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
atlassian.com (this site) 56 78 Custom / Proprietary 64.8× 1
team.com 56 78 Custom / Proprietary 64.8× 1 Compare →
wftv.com 46 66 Custom / Proprietary 63.6× 0 Compare →
atlassian.net 55 77 Custom / Proprietary 73.6× 1 Compare →
swiftqueue.co.uk 39 67 Custom / Proprietary 65.9× 0 Compare →
swiftqueue.com 39 66 Custom / Proprietary 63.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 68 PAGES
40%
Homepage Ghost
52%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
155%
Homepage Bloat
1108%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
40%
1 pg · ACRI 69
Orphan
52%
67 pg · ACRI 47
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
50% https://www.atlassian.com/es/agile/tutorials/epics orphan
50% https://www.atlassian.com/fr/agile/tutorials/epics orphan
50% https://www.atlassian.com/it/agile/tutorials/epics orphan
40% https://www.atlassian.com/agile/tutorials orphan
40% https://www.atlassian.com/git/articles orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

68 PAGES
83.7%
Gini Inequality
Extreme hoarding
86%
Top-3 PR Share
Equity held by 3 pages
67
Orphan Pages
98.5% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
67 disconnected
23%
Semantic Cohesion
Topical Drift
2% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
99% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/product-discovery/pricing https://www.atlassian.com/software/bitbucket/pricing https://www.atlassian.com/blog https://atlassian.com/blog https://www.atlassian.com/software/guard/pricing
⚠️
67 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.84 means the top 3 pages hoard 86% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.84 indicates severe equity hoarding — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while hundreds starve. AI crawlers penalize this by ignoring deep pages.
🔄

Semantic Cannibalization

low 41 TOPICS
41
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
2
Cannibal Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Low
Severity
≤5 pairs
Cannibalizing Page Groups
🔴 listen, workday, ambitious 100% avg similarity · ACRI 67–67
  • https://www.atlassian.com/blog
  • https://atlassian.com/blog
🔴 collaboration, software, business 100% avg similarity · ACRI 25–25
  • https://www.atlassian.com/it/agile/tutorials/epics
  • https://www.atlassian.com/fr/agile/tutorials/epics
Cannibalization occurs when multiple pages target the same semantic space (>92% cosine similarity). AI models pick one authoritative page and ignore duplicates — the losing page gets zero citations. Merging or differentiating cannibalizing pages is the highest-ROI fix for most sites.
Get a full merge/redirect plan for all 2 cannibalizing pairs
Unlock Merge Recommendations →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

3 MISSING 100% COVERAGE
Extracted from Content (10)
Jira 207× 34% Go 27× 24% SSO 14× 10% REST 9× 9% Slack 2× 3% React 2× 2% Rust 1× 2% Java 1× 2% Docker 1× 2% GitHub 1× 2%
📋 Declared in JSON-LD (10)
Atlassian Atlassian Japan 公式ブログ | アトラシアン株式会社 Bitbucket Compass Confluence Guard Jira Jira Product Discovery Loom Work Life by Atlassian
⚠️ 3 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go SSO REST
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 10 declared vs 10 extracted — 100% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🧭

Semantic Nearest Neighbors

View all →
42%
Overlap
34
ACRI
Compare
39%
Overlap
64
ACRI
Compare
appdirect.com
B2B subscription commerce platform for technology services
38%
Overlap
78
ACRI
Compare
38%
Overlap
69
ACRI
Compare
37%
Overlap
47
ACRI
Compare
View All Semantic Alternatives → 📚 Docs Quality Index →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to atlassian.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Atlassian",
  "url": "https://atlassian.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://atlassian.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Atlassian?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Atlassian does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Atlassian work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Atlassian."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for atlassian.com:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
90
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

3.5
AI-Trust
#949
Global Rank
46%
Percentile
16
Inbound AI Links
10
Outbound AI Links
46
Avg Inbound ACRI
19%
Invisible Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
jxl.app 64 0.0 ← cites you
optin.com 60 0.0 ← cites you
rewind.io 57 0.0 ← cites you
rewind.com 57 0.0 ← cites you
nag.wiki 54 0.0 ← cites you
onlineornot.com 51 0.0 ← cites you
jenkins.io 47 0.0 ← cites you
loom.com 46 0.0 ← cites you
geoserver.org 46 0.0 ← cites you
customercase.com 45 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →