arcelik.com 62 C
🛡️ SEO 37 🤖 GEO 89 ⚡ Perf 16 🏗️ Arch 92

arcelik.com — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

arcelik.com
📊

With a solid 84/100 ACRI, arcelik.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 98% of sites in the Radar. In the infrastructure sector, arcelik.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 3.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (16) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 24, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than arcelik.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)37 × 0.25 = 9.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)89 × 0.40 = 35.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)16 × 0.20 = 3.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 9.2 + 35.6 + 3.2 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
89
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 13%
Rank #127854
-10 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 84/100

arcelik.com is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why arcelik.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat3.5×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

37/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

41 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

240 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.arcelik.com.tr
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Teknolojiyle Hayatın Kalbinde - Arçelik
  • ✓ og:description — Arçelik, yenilikçi beyaz eşya, televizyon, mobil cihazlar ve küçük ev aletleri gibi geniş ürün gamıyla evinizdeki konforu yükseltiyor. Kalite, performans ve estetiği bir arada bulacağınız Arçelik ürünleri için tıklayın!
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

89/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, plodopitomnik-sad.ru (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
arcelik.com
78
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.ru has schema coverage of 12 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 89/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 437 elements (437 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1844
Raw Density23.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

82
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability82/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

28%
🗑️ 72%
Useful Content (144.4 KB)Bloat (358.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context94% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage194 / 207 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

38 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 71.3% · SNR: 0.40 · Signal: 36958 / Noise: 91676 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of arcelik.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Home appliances and technology reviews, tips, and product recommendations
Target Audience
Homeowners and consumers looking for appliance and technology solutions
Pricing Model
Free content with optional premium services
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time6731 ms
Raw HTML Size502.5 KB
Visible Text Size144.4 KB

Performance & Speed

16/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

6731 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3161
DOM nodes
502 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.arcelik.com.tr/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

471
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → tr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 78/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for arcelik.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/arcelik.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=arcelik.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
78
Single-page score
-19
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
59
Avg across 1 pages · Range 59–59
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 78, but internal pages average only 59 — a -19-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1005
Avg Bloat
34.4×
Ext. Citations
6
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://arcelik.com/blog
Güncel İçerikler, Faydalı İpuçları ve Öneriler | Arçelik Blog
blog 59 34.4× 1005
🔗
Outbound External Citations
6 unique external domains cited across 1 pages
instagram.com ×1
youtube.com ×1
twitter.com ×1
facebook.com ×1
arcelik.com.tr ×1
wa.me ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/arcelik.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to arcelik.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
arcelik.com (this site) 78 84 Custom / Proprietary 3.5× 2
arcelik.com.tr 78 84 Custom / Proprietary 3.5× 2 Compare →
ewe.com 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 2 Compare →
jizzhut.com 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 2 Compare →
youjizz.com 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 2 Compare →
cs-online.su 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to arcelik.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Arcelik?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Arcelik does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Arcelik work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Arcelik."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for arcelik.com:

Current Score
84
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history