adop.cc 59 D
🛡️ SEO 59 🤖 GEO 63 ⚡ Perf 43 🏗️ Arch 67

adop.cc — Global SEODiff Score 59/100

adop.cc
📊

With a solid 80/100 ACRI, adop.cc is well-positioned for AI search — better than 94% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 57), adop.cc performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The bloated 24.8× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

59
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (43) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (25×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than adop.cc?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)59 × 0.25 = 14.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)63 × 0.40 = 25.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)43 × 0.20 = 8.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)67 × 0.15 = 10.0
Weighted sum = 14.8 + 25.2 + 8.6 + 10.0
Global SEODiff Score = 59 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
53
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #46768
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

adop.cc has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why adop.cc ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat24.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

59/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

83 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

98 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://adop.cc/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko-KR
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 광고 수익 최적화 전문 애드테크 기업 - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
  • ✓ og:description — 퍼블리셔(Web,App)와 광고주를 위한 광고 수익 최적화 서비스를 제공합니다.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

63/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, seltotobuka.com (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
adop.cc
52
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. seltotobuka.com has schema coverage of 7 blocks and uses Cloudflare Pages. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 53/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 36 elements (36 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words428
Raw Density8.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

4%
🗑️ 96%
Useful Content (8.2 KB)Bloat (194.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio24.8× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context5% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 39 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 202.5 KB, but only 8.2 KB is text. 4% useful / 96% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (24.8×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 5% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.0% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 2089 / Noise: 49760 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of adop.cc and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides a real-time bidding (RTB) interface for digital advertising, facilitating the exchange of ads between publishers and
Target Audience
Digital advertisers, ad agencies, publishers, media companies, and programmatic advertising specialists.
Pricing Model
Data not found in text.
🔗 Integration Partners
X+1NexagePubmaticSmaataJumptap
🛡️ Compliance Standards
IABSOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
Standardized RTB protocol and continuous updates based on industry trends, ensuring a secure and transparent programmatic advertising ecosystem.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of standardized interface for ad exchanges
• Ad fraud and revenue loss
• Poor publisher quality due to ad supply issues
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx/1.16.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time5590 ms
Raw HTML Size202.5 KB
Visible Text Size8.2 KB

Performance & Speed

43/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

5590 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

677
DOM nodes
202 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.netgoogletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

67/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://adop.cc/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

41
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko-KR
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for adop.cc
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/adop.cc" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=adop.cc" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 72 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
-5
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 72 pages · Range 30–69
Topical Cohesion
5%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
15650
Avg Bloat
300.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
7
⚠️
7 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 7 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://adop.cc/%eb%94%94%ec%a7%80%ed%84%b8-%ea%b4%91%ea%b3%a0%ec%9d%98-%ea%b7%9c%ec%95%bd-open-rtb-%ec%95%8c%ec%95%84%eb%b3%b4%ea%b8%b0/
디지털 광고의 규약, OPEN RTB 알아보기 - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 69 35.3× 932 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/open-rtb-%ec%9e%85%ec%b0%b0-%eb%aa%a8%eb%8d%b8-first-price%ec%99%80-second-price%ec%97%90-%eb%8c%80%ed%95%9c-%ec%9d%b4%ed%95%b4/
OPEN RTB 입찰 모델 FIRST PRICE와 SECOND PRICE에 대한 이해 - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 65 52.7× 608 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/%eb%94%94%ec%a7%80%ed%84%b8-%ea%b4%91%ea%b3%a0-%ec%83%9d%ed%83%9c%ea%b3%84%ec%9d%98-%ec%a7%88%ec%a0%81-%ec%84%b1%ec%9e%a5%ec%9d%84-%ec%a0%80%ed%95%b4%ed%95%98%eb%8a%94-ad-fraud/
디지털 광고 생태계의 질적 성장을 저해하는 AD FRAUD - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 65 52.5× 607 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/%eb%82%b4-%ea%b4%91%ea%b3%a0-viewability-%eb%86%92%ec%9d%b4%ea%b8%b0-%ec%8b%a4%ec%a0%84%ed%8e%b8/
내 광고 VIEWABILITY 높이기 : 실전편 - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 65 45.4× 708 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/%ed%97%a4%eb%8d%94%eb%b9%84%eb%94%a9%ec%9d%b4-%eb%ad%98%ea%b9%8c%ec%9a%94/
헤더비딩이 뭘까요? - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 65 63.3× 501 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/%ed%8e%98%ec%9d%b4%ec%8a%a4%eb%b6%81-%ec%9d%b8%ec%8a%a4%ed%84%b4%ed%8a%b8-%ec%95%84%ed%8b%b0%ed%81%b4%ec%9d%84-%ec%95%84%ec%8b%9c%eb%82%98%ec%9a%94/
페이스북 인스턴트 아티클을 아시나요? - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 65 56.5× 562 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/en/ma-solution/
MA Solution - ADOP | 애드오피
pricing 61 55.5× 670 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/blog/
BLOG - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 56 161.5× 234 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://adop.cc/blog
BLOG - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 56 161.5× 234 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://adop.cc/news-letter/
NEWS LETTER - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 56 110.8× 330 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://adop.cc/native-ads/
NATIVE ADS - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 55 98.5× 318 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/aws-publicly-referenceable/
고객사례 - M 언론사 - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 55 99.2× 312 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/viewability-%ec%b4%88%eb%b3%b4%ec%9e%90%ed%8e%b8/
VIEWABILITY (초보자편) - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 55 153.4× 201 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/6837-2/
[애드오피 이야기] 2021년 청년친화강소기업에 3년 연속 선정! - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 55 139.5× 229 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/%ec%98%a8%eb%9d%bc%ec%9d%b8-%eb%8f%99%ec%98%81%ec%83%81-%ea%b4%91%ea%b3%a0%ec%97%90-%eb%8c%80%ed%95%b4-%ec%9d%b4%ed%95%b4%ed%95%98%ea%b8%b0-2%ed%8e%b8-_-vast-vpaid/
온라인 동영상 광고에 대해 이해하기 2편 _ VAST & VPAID - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 55 65.8× 481 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/%ec%98%a8%eb%9d%bc%ec%9d%b8-%eb%8f%99%ec%98%81%ec%83%81-%ea%b4%91%ea%b3%a0%ec%97%90-%eb%8c%80%ed%95%b4-%ec%9d%b4%ed%95%b4%ed%95%98%ea%b8%b0-1%ed%8e%b8-_-instream-outstream/
온라인 동영상 광고에 대해 이해하기 1편 _ INSTREAM & OUTSTREAM - 테크랩스 with 애드오피
pricing 55 66.3× 483 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/id/web-for-publisher-3/
WEB for Publisher - ADOP | 애드오피
pricing 51 158.6× 213 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/vi/video-5/
Video - ADOP | 애드오피
pricing 51 163.1× 207 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/th/home-3/
ADOP | 애드오피 - แอดโอพี ประเทศไทย สวัสดี
pricing 51 120.9× 346 💰 Pricing
https://adop.cc/vi/web-for-publisher-4/
WEB for Publisher - ADOP | 애드오피
pricing 51 104.6× 324 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 72 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/th/ 15 43 1% 464.4× Bot Blocked
/en/ 8 46 1% 183.2× Bot Blocked
/vi/ 6 51 1% 122.1× Bot Blocked
/id/ 6 44 1% 182.5× Bot Blocked
/category/ 5 44 1% 544.7× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 2 56 1% 161.5× Bot Blocked
/애드오피-트렌드-viewability/ 1 35 1% 804.0× Bot Blocked
/온라인-동영상-광고에-대해-이해하기-1편-_-instream-outstream/ 1 55 1% 66.3× Bot Blocked
/애드오피-트렌드-2020-모바일-현황/ 1 35 1% 901.1× Bot Blocked
/viewability-초보자편/ 1 55 1% 153.4× Bot Blocked
/native-ads/ 1 55 1% 98.5× Bot Blocked
/news-letter/ 1 56 1% 110.8× Bot Blocked
/페이스북-인스턴트-아티클을-아시나요/ 1 65 1% 56.5× Bot Blocked
/애드오피-이야기-2020년-review-경영설명회/ 1 45 1% 160.7× Bot Blocked
/디지털-광고-생태계의-질적-성장을-저해하는-ad-fraud/ 1 65 1% 52.5× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 72 pages
facebook.com ×72
linkedin.com ×72
youtube.com ×72
atom.adop.cc ×5
go.adop.cc ×5
mailchi.mp ×3
testmysite.thinkwithgoogle.com ×1
jobkorea.co.kr ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/adop.cc

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to adop.cc. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
adop.cc (this site) 52 80 WordPress 24.8× 1
traveler.marriott.com 77 90 WordPress 17.9× 1 Compare →
honeybros.com 77 95 WordPress 18.2× 2 Compare →
reviewecon.com 77 90 WordPress 12.1× 1 Compare →
treasuredata.co.jp 77 88 WordPress 9.2× 1 Compare →
1-butsudan.jp 77 87 WordPress 4.1× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite adop.cc when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to adop.cc. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 4% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Adop?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Adop does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Adop work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Adop."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for adop.cc:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history