At 58/100, adac.de falls in the moderate bracket of AI-Readiness, suggesting its content is partially accessible to AI systems but not fully optimized. Within the ecommerce vertical, this places adac.de above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 30% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.
49
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (29) has the most room for improvement.
Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (88×) → +5–10 pts
📈
ACRI Trend
24 snapshots
Mar 4
Mar 21
🔔
Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄
Mar 14
Content change detected
🔄
Mar 12
Content change detected
🔄
Mar 12
Content change detected
🔄
Mar 11
Content change detected
🔄
Mar 10
Content change detected
Does your site score higher than adac.de?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)46 × 0.40 = 18.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 18.4 + 9.4 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 49 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
10
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.6%
Rank #6223
+57 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 57%
Score 58/100
adac.de punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →
Why adac.de ranks here
Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryecommerce
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+
Fastest improvements
- Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
- Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
- Create an
llms.txtfile so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt → - Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
Traditional SEO
29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence📝 Title Tag
42 chars
Good length
Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.
📋 Meta Description
140 chars
Good length
Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.
🔤 Heading Hierarchy
- ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
- ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
- ✗ <h2> not before <h1>
🔍 Indexability
- ✓ Canonical tag present →
https://www.adac.de/ - ✓ No noindex directive
- ✓ Meta viewport set
- ✓ HTML lang attribute →
de-DE - ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
- ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt
🌐 Social / OpenGraph
- ✗ og:title
- ✗ og:description
- ✓ og:image — preview
- ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated
SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)
Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.
AI Readiness / GEO
46/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High ConfidenceThis pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.
Insight: In the ecommerce sector,
24sevenmegastore.com
(ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability.
AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage.
Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage.
24sevenmegastore.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks
and uses Django.
Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.
👻
Shadow Content Detected:
30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process).
Combined with 88.2x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content.
This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…
🤖 Bot Access Matrix
✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed
👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs
Ghost Ratio
30%
Status
Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type
Hybrid
📊 Structure & Information Density Docs
Structure Grade
10/100 — Poor
Structured Elements
4 elements (4 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1353
Raw Density0.3%
Low structure score (10/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 4 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.
🏷️ Schema Health Docs
Organization Schema
❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema
⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected
Schema Coverage Map
0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.
📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs
25
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability25/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked
Token Bloat Research
Useful Content (10.8 KB)Bloat (937.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated
Multimodal Readiness
Visual Context65% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage46 / 71 images have alt text
TDM Rights
TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
Your HTML is 948.6 KB, but only 10.8 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research
0
Entropy
Poor
Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.9% ·
SNR: 0.01 ·
Signal: 2754 / Noise: 240092 tokens
🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation
See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖
AI Answer Preview
NEWSee how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.
Simulating AI extraction…
🔧 Tech Stack
FrameworkCustom / Proprietary
AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server—
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time950 ms
Raw HTML Size948.6 KB
Visible Text Size10.8 KB
Performance & Speed
47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence⏱️ Time to First Byte
950 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise
Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.
📦 Page Weight
2128
DOM nodes
DOM nodes
949 KB
HTML payload
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity
🗄️ Cache & CDN
- ✓ Cache-Control header →
max-age=300, stale-while-revalidate=300, stale-if-error=86400 - ✗ CDN cache status
- ✗ CDN detected
🔬 Tracker Tax
0
tracker scripts
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated
Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)
TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.
Architecture & Trust
94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence🗺️ Sitemap & Robots
- ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt →
https://www.adac.de/sitemap_index.xml - ✓ Googlebot allowed
- ✓ GPTBot allowed
- ✓ ClaudeBot allowed
🔗 Linking
339
internal links
internal links
7
external links
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content
🔒 Security & Trust
- ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
- ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
- ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)
♿ Accessibility Signals
- ✓ HTML lang attribute → de-DE
- ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
- ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated
Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)
Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.
🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge
Your site scores 32/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/adac.de" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=adac.de" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>
💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.
� Deep Crawl Analysis 1010 pages · Deep-10
+27
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Topical Cohesion
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1142650
Avg Bloat
111.0×
| Page | Type | ACRI | Token Bloat | Words | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| support | 69 | 19.2× | 3552 | ✓ | |
| pricing | 69 | 139.8× | 573 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 126.3× | 689 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 110.0× | 733 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 123.3× | 717 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 125.8× | 679 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 58.0× | 2705 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 73.0× | 1678 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 62.4× | 2363 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 69.1× | 1848 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 75.6× | 1945 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 115.4× | 697 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 97.1× | 912 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 85.0× | 1143 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 96.7× | 943 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 54.3× | 2054 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 71.1× | 1482 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 72.7× | 1375 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 71.8× | 1413 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 66 | 76.3× | 1832 | 💰 Pricing |
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
| Path | Pages | Avg ACRI | Ghost % | Bloat | Top Issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /rund-ums-fahrzeug/ | 195 | 63 | 1% | 83.6× | Bot Blocked |
| /verkehr/ | 77 | 63 | 1% | 104.3× | Bot Blocked |
| /reise-freizeit/ | 59 | 62 | 1% | 76.4× | Bot Blocked |
| /news/ | 58 | 61 | 1% | 102.7× | Bot Blocked |
| /gesundheit/ | 52 | 61 | 1% | 82.3× | Bot Blocked |
| /rund-ums-haus/ | 29 | 61 | 1% | 77.9× | Bot Blocked |
| /der-adac/ | 12 | 64 | 1% | 98.9× | Bot Blocked |
| /produkte/ | 8 | 62 | 1% | 83.7× | Bot Blocked |
| /fahrzeugwelt/ | 8 | 65 | 0% | 24.5× | High JS Bloat |
| /services/ | 1 | 64 | 0% | 78.7× | High JS Bloat |
| /rechtliches/ | 1 | 61 | 1% | 64.2× | Bot Blocked |
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1010 pages
instagram.com
×997
Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).
🔌 API Access
Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.
curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/adac.deGet your free API key — 100 requests/month included.
🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites
Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to adac.de. Compare side-by-side.
| Domain | ACRI | AI Score | Tech Stack | Token Bloat | Schema | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adac.de (this site) | 32 | 58 | Custom / Proprietary | 88.2× | 0 | — |
| noevirgroup.jp | 57 | 80 | Custom / Proprietary | 4.8× | 0 | Compare → |
| pilottraining.ca | 57 | 71 | Custom / Proprietary | 2.8× | 0 | Compare → |
| aboshop.vn.at | 57 | 74 | Custom / Proprietary | 4.1× | 0 | Compare → |
| edshopweb.com | 57 | 71 | Custom / Proprietary | 3.9× | 0 | Compare → |
| ecolemedia.net | 57 | 70 | Custom / Proprietary | 3.1× | 0 | Compare → |
📊 Semantic Share of Voice
How often would an AI cite adac.de when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.
Analyzing citation landscape…
👻
Rendering Drop-Off by Depth
DEPTH PENALTY 999 PAGES40%
Homepage Ghost
57%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
19%
Homepage Bloat
112%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
40%
orphan
40%
orphan
70%
orphan
40%
orphan
40%
orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage,
meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️
Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution
999 PAGES84.9%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
998
Orphan Pages [?]
99.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
998 disconnected
6%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Topical Drift
0% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
100% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
⚠️
998 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity.
A Gini coefficient of 0.85 means the top 3 pages hoard
85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡
Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page polizeikontrolle,
add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page faq maut vignette austria.
(Semantic Match: 45%)
📥 Orphan: https://www.adac.de/verkehr/recht/verkehrsvorschriften-deutschland/polizeikontrolle/
🔗 Donor: https://www.adac.de/fahrzeugwelt/faq/faq-mautportal/faq-maut-vignette-austria/ (PR: 0.8502)
Get the full link injection plan for all 998 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site.
A Gini of 0.85 indicates significant equity concentration — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while others receive very little link authority. AI crawlers may deprioritize pages with low internal link signals.
🗂️
Topical Authority Distribution
8 TOPICSHow this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 999 crawled pages.
61
2 pgs (12%)
54
2 pgs (12%)
61
2 pgs (12%)
61
2 pgs (12%)
61
2 pgs (12%)
61
2 pgs (12%)
61
2 pgs (12%)
61
2 pgs (12%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲
Semantic Density
MODERATE 945 TOPICS945
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
8
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Moderate
Contextual Depth
>5 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢
windschutzscheibe, arten, lich
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/fahrzeugwelt/magazin/reise-freizeit/vignetten-kaufen/
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-fallen-oesterreich-digitale-vignette/
🟢
gute, alle, planm
100% avg similarity · ACRI 54–54
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-streik-portugal-dezember/
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-streik-flughaefen-portugal/
🟢
reform, des, damit
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/news/aus-fuer-verbrenner-ab-2035/
- https://www.adac.de/news/verkehr-aus-vom-verbrenner-aus/
🟢
deutschland, sie, hessen
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-herbstferien-deutschland-2025/
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-herbstferien-deutschland-2024/
🟢
geht, zeit, planen
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-feiertage-brueckentage-2026/
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-feiertage-brueckentage-2025/
🟢
starten, adac, stau
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-sommerferien-deutschland-2026/
- https://www.adac.de/news/reise-sommerferien-deutschland-2025/
🟢
homeoffice, ferien, hotspots
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/news/staubilanz-2024/
- https://www.adac.de/news/staubilanz-2025/
🟢
bedingungen, wintersportregionen, ist
100% avg similarity · ACRI 61–61
- https://www.adac.de/news/verkehr-baustellen-2025/
- https://www.adac.de/verkehr/verkehrsinformationen/stauprognose/
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 8 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🧬
Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis
5 MISSING 14% COVERAGE✅ Extracted from Content (7)
📋 Declared in JSON-LD (1)
ADAC
⚠️ 5 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go
REST
SSO
Segment
Rust
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 1 declared vs 7 extracted — 14% coverage
Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🩹
Remediation Patches
COPY-PASTEAuto-generated code fixes tailored to adac.de. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →
Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact
⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Adac",
"url": "https://adac.de",
"logo": "https://adac.de/assets/ui/favicon.svg",
"sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact
⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"name": "Adac",
"url": "https://adac.de",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "SearchAction",
"target": "https://adac.de/search?q={search_term_string}",
"query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
}
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact
⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets --> <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css"> <!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer --> <script src="/js/app.js" defer></script> <!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks --> <!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> --> <!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content --> <main> <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first --> </main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact
⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is Adac?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Add your answer here — describe what Adac does in 1-2 sentences."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How does Adac work?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Adac."
}
}
]
}
</script>
📈
Projected Impact
ROI EST.If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for adac.de:
Current Score
58
Projected Score
76
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema
+6 pts
Add WebSite schema
+4 pts
Reduce token bloat
+5 pts
Add FAQ schema
+3 pts
*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.
📋 Data Export
Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).
All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).
Is this your company?
Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.
Start Free →🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)
For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Orphans & Hubs
Deep Audit sections
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
🕒 History
Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history