68xbet.net 70 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 77 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 68

68xbet.net — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

68xbet.net
📊

68xbet.net shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 79% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places 68xbet.net above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.1×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than 68xbet.net?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)77 × 0.40 = 30.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 30.8 + 10.6 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
20
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 10
85
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 25%
Rank #246863
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 21%
Score 74/100

68xbet.net has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why 68xbet.net ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat3.1×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

74 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

200 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://jglrrt.za.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → vi
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
  • ✓ og:description — 8xbet link vào 8xbet.com chính thức, tải app 8xbet Mobile mới nhất 2026, đăng ký ngay để đặt cược thể thao, theo dõi kèo trực tiếp và nhận thưởng siêu hấp dẫn.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

77/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
68xbet.net
61
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 20/100 — Low
Structured Elements 66 elements (53 lists, 11 rows, 2 headers)
Total Words5476
Raw Density1.2%
💡Low structure score (20/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 53 list items, 11 table rows, 2 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

4/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

32%
🗑️ 68%
Useful Content (37.6 KB)Bloat (77.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context90% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage19 / 21 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

48 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 67.4% · SNR: 0.48 · Signal: 9634 / Noise: 19955 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1425 ms
Raw HTML Size115.6 KB
Visible Text Size37.6 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1425 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

869
DOM nodes
116 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://jglrrt.za.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

3
internal links
60
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → vi
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for 68xbet.net
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/68xbet.net" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=68xbet.net" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
+34
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
95
Avg across 10 pages · Range 95–95
Total Words
53080
Avg Bloat
4.5×
Ext. Citations
12
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://68xbet.net/pricing
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/about
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/products
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/features
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/docs
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/blog
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/case-studies
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/contact
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/faq
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
https://68xbet.net/integrations
8XBET ⭐️ Link Vào Trang Chủ 8XBET.COM Mới Nhất | +88K Lộc Lá
pricing 95 4.5× 5308 💰 Pricing
🔗
Outbound External Citations
12 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
500px.com ×10
curacao-egaming.com ×10
url ×10
jglrrt.za.com ×10
15.235.211.176 ×10
twitch.tv ×10
youtube.com ×10
x.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/68xbet.net

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to 68xbet.net. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
68xbet.net (this site) 61 74 WordPress 3.1× 3
order-brides.org 61 74 WordPress 3.1× 3 Compare →
hijackthis.de 61 76 WordPress 3.1× 3 Compare →
ipcworldwide.com 61 15 WordPress 3.2× 3 Compare →
fileabuselawsuit.com 61 80 WordPress 3.2× 3 Compare →
healthimages.com 61 71 WordPress 2.9× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to 68xbet.net. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is 68xbet?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what 68xbet does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does 68xbet work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with 68xbet."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for 68xbet.net:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history