4sw.app 39 F
🛡️ SEO 21 🤖 GEO 39 ⚡ Perf 22 🏗️ Arch 92

4sw.app — Global SEODiff Score 39/100

4sw.app
📊

The AI-Readiness score for 4sw.app is 59/100 — a middling result that leaves significant room to climb the Radar rankings. In the healthcare sector, 4sw.app outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains invisible to static crawlers. A 44.2× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

39
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Critical gaps across the board. Start with Traditional SEO (21).
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (44×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than 4sw.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)21 × 0.25 = 5.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)39 × 0.40 = 15.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)22 × 0.20 = 4.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 5.2 + 15.6 + 4.4 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 39 (F)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
18
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 10
40
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 48%
Rank #476344
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 52%
Score 59/100

4sw.app has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why 4sw.app ranks here

Tech stackAngular
Industryhealthcare
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat44.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

21/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

116 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

317 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 4
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://4sw.app/ar-eg/home
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — فورسواب | أفضل موقع بيع وشراء وتبديل أشياء مستعملة وجديدة في مصر
  • ✓ og:description — أفضل منصة إعلانات مبوبة مجانية لتبديل وبيع وشراء كل ما هو مستعمل وجديد أونلاين في مصر. هتلاقي عقارات، موبايلات، عربيات، أجهزة كهربائية ومنزلية، أثاث وديكور، ضيف إعلانك الآن!
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

39/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, adelaideaccountant.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
4sw.app
30
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. adelaideaccountant.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is trapped in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content invisible to AI crawlers). Combined with 44.2x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 18/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 2 elements (2 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words205
Raw Density1.0%
💡Low structure score (18/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 2 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

29
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability29/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (19.6 KB)Bloat (847.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio44.2× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage36 / 38 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 867.3 KB, but only 19.6 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (44.2×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.7% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 5019 / Noise: 216999 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAngular
AI-Readiness Score40/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time3460 ms
Raw HTML Size867.3 KB
Visible Text Size19.6 KB

Performance & Speed

22/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3460 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1502
DOM nodes
867 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://4sw.app/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

59
internal links
7
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ar
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 30/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for 4sw.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/4sw.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=4sw.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
30
Single-page score
-8
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 10 pages · Range 22–22
Total Words
300
Avg Bloat
3222.9×
Ext. Citations
9
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://4sw.app/pricing
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
pricing 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/about
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
about 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/features
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
product 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/products
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
product 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/docs
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
docs 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/blog
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
blog 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/case-studies
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
social-proof 22 3223.0× 30
https://4sw.app/contact
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
support 22 3222.9× 30
https://4sw.app/integrations
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
integrations 22 3223.0× 30
https://4sw.app/faq
فورسواب | فورسواب الموقع الأول للبدل في مصر.. بدل .. بيع .. إشتري
support 22 3222.9× 30
🔗
Outbound External Citations
9 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
instagram.com ×10
blog.4sw.app ×10
youtube.com ×10
twitter.com ×10
dl.4sw.app ×10
facebook.com ×10
linkedin.com ×10
wa.me ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/4sw.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to 4sw.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
4sw.app (this site) 30 59 Angular 44.2× 1
yougov.com 36 60 Angular 43.2× 0 Compare →
deutsche-apotheker-zeitung.de 29 51 Angular 48.3× 0 Compare →
seebiz.com 35 59 Angular 41.1× 0 Compare →
dawaadost.com 34 15 Angular 38.5× 1 Compare →
screenfortype1.com 37 65 Angular 39.7× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to 4sw.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "4sw",
  "url": "https://4sw.app",
  "logo": "favicon.ico?v=1.1.2",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is 4sw?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what 4sw does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does 4sw work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with 4sw."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for 4sw.app:

Current Score
59
Projected Score
73
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history