AI Visibility Gap Identified

note.com ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability. Here's the analysis — and practical steps to improve.

23
note.com
Grade F
nuxt
VS
93
tool-off.com
Grade A+
wordpress

Assessment: AI Visibility Gap

note.com has an ACRI score of 23, compared to tool-off.com with ACRI 93 — a 70-point gap that may affect AI citation rates.

Risk Factor: 253x Token Bloat + JS Rendering Gap

📊 Evidence Dashboard

Evidence Score

72/100
Composite (retrieval 50% + hallucination 30% + bloat 10% + rank 10%)

Retrieval Mismatch

100%
3/3 queries returned a competitor instead

Hallucination Rate

38%
5/8 fields extracted correctly

Token Bloat

253x
HTML tokens per useful content token

🔍 Shadow RAG Probe Results

Each query was run against our FAISS-indexed corpus of 100,000+ domains. The table shows who the retrieval pipeline cited as the top answer.

QueryTypeTop RetrievedACRIResult
What is note ――つくる、つながる、とどける。? entity tool-off.com 93 ⚠ Mismatch
What features does note ――つくる、つながる、とどける。 offer? product tool-off.com 93 ⚠ Mismatch
best technology solution for enterprise comparison tool-off.com 93 ⚠ Mismatch

🔧 Remediation Checklist for note.com

Prioritized technical fixes to reclaim AI citation share. Total estimated effort: 1–3 engineering sprints.

Is your domain at risk?

Run a free AI Visibility scan to check your ACRI score, token bloat, and hallucination risk.

View Full Domain Report →