tour.ne.jp 60 C
🛡️ SEO 38 🤖 GEO 83 ⚡ Perf 24 🏗️ Arch 81

tour.ne.jp — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

tour.ne.jp
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for tour.ne.jp is strong: an ACRI of 80/100 places it ahead of 94% of domains in the index. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.4×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (24) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than tour.ne.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)38 × 0.25 = 9.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)83 × 0.40 = 33.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)24 × 0.20 = 4.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 9.5 + 33.2 + 4.8 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #71636
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

tour.ne.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tour.ne.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

38/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

87 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

225 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.tour.ne.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

83/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 2322 elements (390 lists, 864 rows, 1068 headers)
Total Words4329
Raw Density53.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

41%
🗑️ 59%
Useful Content (213.1 KB)Bloat (287.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context89% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage31 / 35 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

65 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 57.4% · SNR: 0.74 · Signal: 54545 / Noise: 73641 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of tour.ne.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Travelco is a travel blog and comparison site aggregating travel content from a network of travel bloggers and experts, providing
Target Audience
Travel enthusiasts, tourists, and travelers seeking inspiration and information for their trips, including families and solo travelers.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Vast travel content library and community-driven curation, offering a diverse range of perspectives and detailed destination information.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template-generated blog post pages (e.g., ‘エリア × テーマからブログを探す’)Directory pages for destinations and themes (e.g., ‘エリア:全エリア | テーマ:全テーマ’)Integration of user-generated content (blog posts) with metadata.
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO optimization of individual blog posts.
• Lack of structured FAQ schema.
• Potential for content duplication across blogs.
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerApache
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1925 ms
Raw HTML Size500.7 KB
Visible Text Size213.1 KB

Performance & Speed

24/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1925 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

8173
DOM nodes
501 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.tour.ne.jp/sitemap_j_tour_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1275
internal links
17
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 76/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tour.ne.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tour.ne.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tour.ne.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 51 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
76
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
73
Avg across 51 pages · Range 65–75
Total Words
255194
Avg Bloat
45.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hiroshima/
広島旅行・広島ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.8× 5322 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/atami/
熱海旅行・熱海ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.2× 5329 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/gumma/
群馬旅行・群馬ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.2× 5368 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/gifu/
岐阜旅行・岐阜ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.7× 5311 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/chiba/
千葉旅行・千葉ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.2× 5326 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/fukushima/
福島旅行・福島ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.5× 5335 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/akita/
秋田旅行・秋田ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.4× 5332 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/fukuoka/
福岡旅行・福岡ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.6× 5331 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/cyugoku/
中国地方(山陰・山陽)旅行・ツアーの格安プランを比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.3× 5362 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/fukui/
福井旅行・福井ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.8× 5258 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hakone/
箱根旅行・箱根ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.0× 5375 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/aichi/
愛知旅行・愛知ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 45.6× 5478 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hakata/
博多旅行・博多ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 45.8× 5384 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/aomori/
青森旅行・青森ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 46.4× 5344 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hokkaido/
北海道旅行・北海道ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 75 44.9× 5763 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hikone/
彦根旅行・彦根ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 72 46.6× 5065 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hachinohe/
八戸旅行・八戸ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 72 46.6× 4990 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/hamamatsu/
浜松旅行・浜松ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 72 46.9× 5035 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/fukuyama/
福山旅行・福山ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 72 46.9× 4946 💰 Pricing
https://www.tour.ne.jp/j_tour/area/abashiri/
網走旅行・網走ツアーのおすすめプラン | 格安・最安値比較【トラベルコ】
pricing 72 46.6× 5018 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 51 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/j_tour/ 49 73 0% 46.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 65 0% 25.2× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 65 0% 41.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 51 pages
instagram.com ×51
opendoor.co.jp ×51
play.google.com ×51
ssl.tour.ne.jp ×51
youtube.com ×51
apps.apple.com ×51
facebook.com ×51
kogeijapan.com ×51
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tour.ne.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tour.ne.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tour.ne.jp (this site) 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0
thycotic.net 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 3 Compare →
up-t.jp 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 3 Compare →
safescan.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 5 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
educationdirectory.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.1× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite tour.ne.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tour.ne.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Ne",
  "url": "https://tour.ne.jp",
  "logo": "travel.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Ne",
  "url": "https://tour.ne.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://tour.ne.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Ne?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Ne does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Ne work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Ne."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tour.ne.jp:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history