ticket.co.jp 63 C
🛡️ SEO 38 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 33 🏗️ Arch 81

ticket.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

ticket.co.jp
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for ticket.co.jp is strong: an ACRI of 80/100 places it ahead of 94% of domains in the index. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 2.8× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (33) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than ticket.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)38 × 0.25 = 9.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)33 × 0.20 = 6.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 9.5 + 35.2 + 6.6 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #80185
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

ticket.co.jp has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why ticket.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.8×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

38/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

71 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

247 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.ticket.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — �å�ή�̥�󥿡�å�åȾ�ϡ�¿�Υꥻ�ѥ�å�㥵�
  • ✓ og:description — �ڹ�No1�μ�ӡۥ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�ϥ�åȤ�ꤿ�㤤�Ĥʤ�Ŀʹ֤Υ�åȤ�輡�ӥ�Ǥ�¿�Υ�åȥꥻ�륵�ȤȤ�25ǯ�åȤ�Ϥ�ʤ�ֶ⡣�󥵡�ȡ�饤�֡�ݡ�ġ�ࡢ�ͤʤɤο͵�åȤ�¿�ޤ�
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 687 elements (681 lists, 6 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1535
Raw Density44.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

35%
🗑️ 65%
Useful Content (33.2 KB)Bloat (59.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.8× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context90% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage26 / 29 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

55 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 64.1% · SNR: 0.56 · Signal: 8503 / Noise: 15188 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of ticket.co.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides a collaborative sprint planning tool that leverages AI to optimize resource allocation and improve team productivity, particularly for distributed teams.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, scrum masters, and software development teams.
Pricing Model
Offers a free plan with limited features, and paid tiers ranging from $10 to $50 per user per month, based on team size and feature access.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and predictive analytics, offering a more dynamic and efficient approach than traditional methods.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2702 ms
Raw HTML Size92.5 KB
Visible Text Size33.2 KB

Performance & Speed

33/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2702 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2501
DOM nodes
92 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.ticket.co.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

803
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 76/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for ticket.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/ticket.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=ticket.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 31 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
76
Single-page score
-7
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
70
Avg across 31 pages · Range 65–75
Total Words
84708
Avg Bloat
13.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.ticket.co.jp/concert/
�饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.4× 24210 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/niconico/
�Τ�ꡦ�ܥ�˥�˥�Υ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.7× 706 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/hanryu/
K-POP�ή�Υ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 12.7× 928 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/classical-music/
�饷�å�㥺�Υ�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.7× 2463 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/play-theater-stage/
�ࡦ�Υ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 12.8× 6119 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/artist/
�⥢�ƥ�ȤΥ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.6× 18353 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/artist-male/
�ƥ�ȤΥ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 14.1× 3786 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/artist-female/
�ƥ�ȤΥ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 14.3× 2880 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/artist-group/
�Х�ɡ�롼�פΥ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.2× 12337 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/ldh/
LDH�Υ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 10.9× 836 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/anime-game-music/
�˥ᡦ�ͥ�Υ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.5× 1209 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/foreign-artist/
�ƥ�ȤΥ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 12.2× 959 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/music-event-fes/
�ե�ڥ�٥�ȤΥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 11.6× 2791 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/johnnys/
�ȥ�󥿡�ƥ�ȡʵ쥸�ˡ�ˤΥ饤�֡�󥵡�ȥ�åȰ�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 75 13.0× 903 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/faq/b_04.php
�㤤�꤫�褯�䨢�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 65 13.8× 380 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/faq/faq.php
FAQ�褯�䨢�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 65 14.3× 302 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/faq/u_00.php
FAQ�褯�䨢�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 65 12.2× 252 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/faq/u_01.php
�Ͽ�˴ؤ�褯�䨢�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 65 12.0× 281 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/faq/u_02.php
�Ͽ�˴ؤ�褯�䨢�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 65 13.0× 322 💰 Pricing
https://www.ticket.co.jp/faq/b_00.php
FAQ�褯�䨢�å�ή�̥�󥿡�
pricing 65 13.1× 319 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 31 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 13 65 0% 13.4× High JS Bloat
/youtuber-music/ 1 65 0% 13.2× High JS Bloat
/classical-music/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/hanryu/ 1 75 0% 12.7× High JS Bloat
/artist/ 1 75 0% 13.6× High JS Bloat
/foreign-artist/ 1 75 0% 12.2× High JS Bloat
/music-event-fes/ 1 75 0% 11.6× High JS Bloat
/takarazuka/ 1 65 0% 12.3× High JS Bloat
/vtuber-music/ 1 65 0% 11.8× High JS Bloat
/tobe/ 1 65 0% 11.6× High JS Bloat
/niconico/ 1 75 0% 13.7× High JS Bloat
/play-theater-stage/ 1 75 0% 12.8× High JS Bloat
/artist-male/ 1 75 0% 14.1× High JS Bloat
/artist-group/ 1 75 0% 13.2× High JS Bloat
/ldh/ 1 75 0% 10.9× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 31 pages
vividseats.com ×31
paypal.com ×1
jp-bank.japanpost.jp ×1
veritrans.co.jp ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/ticket.co.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to ticket.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
ticket.co.jp (this site) 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 0
up-t.jp 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 3 Compare →
thycotic.com 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 3 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
agedcarefind.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
pubsandclubs.com.au 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.9× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to ticket.co.jp. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://ticket.co.jp",
  "logo": "https://ticket.co.jp/img/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://ticket.co.jp",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://ticket.co.jp/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for ticket.co.jp:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history