thenewslens.com 45 D
🛡️ SEO 37 🤖 GEO 86 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 81

thenewslens.com — Global SEODiff Score 45/100

thenewslens.com
📊

The AI-Readiness score for thenewslens.com stands at a concerning 15/100, placing it among the least AI-accessible sites in the index. In the social sector, thenewslens.com underperforms relative to the average (57), indicating room for competitive improvement. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 3.4× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Most AI crawlers are blocked by robots.txt, severely restricting how AI-powered search engines can index and surface this content.

45
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (37) needs urgent attention.
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than thenewslens.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)37 × 0.25 = 9.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)86 × 0.40 = 34.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 9.2 + 34.4 + 7.8 + 12.2
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 45 (D)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
40
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 10
50
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #47831
+60 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 64%
Score 15/100

thenewslens.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why thenewslens.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat3.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

37/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

60 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

619 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.thenewslens.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant-TW
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — TNL The News Lens 關鍵評論網
  • ✓ og:description — 我們是一群對於現今媒體不滿又想要做出一些改變的人。有一直在媒體產業的編輯,有多年在海外各地工作的專業經理人,還有對於網路技術有熱情的開發者,以及一群對於我們這個夢想有興趣,願意一起幫忙的實習生、朋友以及許多外稿作者。 我們夢想中的媒體是除了陳述事實之外,還能夠提供多元、不同方向的觀點,並為智慧手機、平板、電腦等不同平台提供各自適合閱讀內容。也讓社交網路世代的使用者,能夠更輕鬆的分享、討論和參與他們有興趣的議題。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

86/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
thenewslens.com
70
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 215 elements (215 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words548
Raw Density39.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
High
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskHigh — 3 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

29%
🗑️ 71%
Useful Content (64.0 KB)Bloat (152.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context85% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage57 / 67 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

40 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 70.5% · SNR: 0.42 · Signal: 16371 / Noise: 39131 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1950 ms
Raw HTML Size216.8 KB
Visible Text Size64.0 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1950 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1501
DOM nodes
217 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=300, must-revalidate, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.netgoogletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.thenewslens.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

360
internal links
21
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant-TW
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 70/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for thenewslens.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/thenewslens.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=thenewslens.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to thenewslens.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
thenewslens.com (this site) 70 15 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 3
web.dev 69 77 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 3 Compare →
html5rocks.com 69 77 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 3 Compare →
toolbooks.pro 71 81 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 3 Compare →
ml-club.com 72 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.5× 3 Compare →
animeforum.ru 70 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to thenewslens.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is blocked — Claude cannot cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Thenewslens?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Thenewslens does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Thenewslens work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Thenewslens."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for thenewslens.com:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
31
Improvement
+16 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history