takeda.tv 60 C
🛡️ SEO 38 🤖 GEO 89 ⚡ Perf 21 🏗️ Arch 70

takeda.tv — Global SEODiff Score 60/100

takeda.tv
📊

takeda.tv achieves a 80/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 1.6× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

60
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (21) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than takeda.tv?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)38 × 0.25 = 9.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)89 × 0.40 = 35.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)21 × 0.20 = 4.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 9.5 + 35.6 + 4.2 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 60 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
100
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 31%
Rank #305134
-24 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

takeda.tv ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 31%) than in AI search (Top 6%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why takeda.tv ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat1.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

38/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

75 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

253 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.takeda.tv/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 日本初!授業をしない。武田塾|徹底管理の個別指導塾
  • ✓ og:description — 大学受験に強い塾・予備校なら【武田塾】。独自の勉強法で全国の高校生・既卒生の志望校合格をサポート!E判定からの難関大・私大への逆転合格も多数!中学生・小学生対応校舎有り。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

89/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 992 elements (992 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2738
Raw Density36.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

75
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability75/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

62%
🗑️ 38%
Useful Content (227.9 KB)Bloat (140.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage47 / 47 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

85 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 38.1% · SNR: 1.62 · Signal: 58337 / Noise: 35943 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of takeda.tv and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
個別指導塾,不参加也能考取顶尖大学
Target Audience
高中生,既往生,中学生
Pricing Model
未提及
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-26

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2886 ms
Raw HTML Size368.3 KB
Visible Text Size227.9 KB

Performance & Speed

21/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2886 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

3167
DOM nodes
368 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1295
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 78/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for takeda.tv
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/takeda.tv" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=takeda.tv" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1010 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
78
Single-page score
-22
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
57
Avg across 1010 pages · Range 0–75
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 78, but internal pages average only 57 — a -22-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
8%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
187125
Avg Bloat
181.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
6
⚠️
6 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 6 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.takeda.tv/hanshinkoshien/blog/post-226507/
神戸大学って日本で何番目?偏差値が低い学部はどこ?難易度は? - 予備校なら武田塾 阪神甲子園校
blog 75 55.3× 687
https://www.takeda.tv/aoto/blog/post-266193/
【受験生必見】大学受験のその先!業界・企業について知っておこう! - 予備校なら武田塾 青砥校
blog 75 52.0× 523
https://www.takeda.tv/yukuhashi/blog/post-250817/
1日10時間勉強する人がやっているコト5選をご紹介! - 予備校なら武田塾 行橋校
pricing 75 66.8× 523 💰 Pricing
https://www.takeda.tv/hodogaya/blog/post-215532/
【2024年版】早稲田大学の合格しやすい穴場学部を徹底紹介!!この学部を狙え! - 予備校なら武田塾 保土ヶ谷校
pricing 75 48.2× 874 💰 Pricing
https://www.takeda.tv/tokiwadai/blog/post-264377/
【2024年度】早慶上理GMARCH四工大日東の理工学部徹底解説 - 予備校なら武田塾 ときわ台校
pricing 75 29.9× 1510 💰 Pricing
https://www.takeda.tv/oyama/blog/post-235659/
👨‍🏫 【武田塾小山校】校舎長・スタッフの自己紹介 👩‍🏫
pricing 75 72.3× 559 💰 Pricing
https://www.takeda.tv/yamato/blog/post-276083/
【大学紹介 立教大学】 - 予備校なら武田塾 大和校
blog 75 40.6× 871
https://www.takeda.tv/wakayama/blog/post-165228/
和歌山県立医科大学(和医大)医学部合格へ!二次試験の傾向と対策 - 予備校なら武田塾 和歌山校
pricing 75 43.2× 758 💰 Pricing
https://www.takeda.tv/kashimada/blog/post-274902/
【新川崎、鹿島田、矢向周辺の中高生必見!】 鹿島田校通信5月号 - 予備校なら武田塾 鹿島田校
blog 75 58.0× 502
https://www.takeda.tv/naha/blog/post-277427/
【必見!】『数学の正しい勉強法』&共テ数学8割にはこの一冊! - 予備校なら武田塾 那覇校
blog 65 123.4× 227
https://www.takeda.tv/nishikasai/blog/post-200296/
英語外部試験を採用している大学を紹介! 英検やGTECは使える? - 予備校なら武田塾 西葛西校
blog 65 74.4× 399
https://www.takeda.tv/karatsu/blog/post-233274/
【共通テスト】英語傾向と対策~9割取れる勉強法~ - 予備校なら武田塾 唐津校
blog 65 78.7× 356
https://www.takeda.tv/hitachinoushiku/blog/post-275575/
【2024】都内大学オープンキャンパス一覧 早慶MARCH日東駒専 - 予備校なら武田塾 ひたち野うしく校
pricing 65 114.1× 250 💰 Pricing
https://www.takeda.tv/yokosukachuou/blog/post-276053/
【受験入門】大学受験をはじめから丁寧に~大学序列編~ - 予備校なら武田塾 横須賀中央校
blog 65 66.6× 439
https://www.takeda.tv/omiya/blog/post-262351/
【受験生のお悩み相談室】過去問は2回も解くべき?? - 予備校なら武田塾 大宮校
blog 65 108.4× 254
https://www.takeda.tv/yonago/blog/post-224754/
【模試】復習してる?模試を最大限活用する方法を徹底解説!
blog 65 114.0× 250
https://www.takeda.tv/kashiwa/blog/post-270032/
【2024年度合格速報:武田塾柏校】(2024年3月8日暫定版) - 予備校なら武田塾 柏校
blog 65 80.8× 323
https://www.takeda.tv/hanshinkoshien/blog/post-278611/
MARCH~国公立レベル志望の人にやってほしい英語長文の参考書 - 予備校なら武田塾 阪神甲子園校
blog 65 86.6× 371
https://www.takeda.tv/toyonaka/blog/post-278210/
【武田塾 豊中校】皇帝ナポレオン1世の誕生~大陸支配と諸国の抵抗~ - 予備校なら武田塾 豊中校
blog 65 104.2× 257
https://www.takeda.tv/mitaka/blog/post-276270/
2025年度 新設 英検®準2級プラス 情報のまとめ! - 予備校なら武田塾 三鷹校
blog 65 96.9× 267
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/nishikasai/ 6 65 0% 108.3× High JS Bloat
/hanshinkoshien/ 5 67 0% 86.1× High JS Bloat
/kashimada/ 5 67 0% 91.0× High JS Bloat
/kuzuha/ 5 65 0% 114.3× High JS Bloat
/ohashi/ 5 63 0% 140.3× High JS Bloat
/centerminami/ 5 61 0% 141.4× High JS Bloat
/kamioooka/ 5 65 0% 111.2× High JS Bloat
/kurume/ 5 63 0% 111.0× High JS Bloat
/kochi/ 5 65 0% 90.9× High JS Bloat
/morioka/ 5 65 0% 136.7× High JS Bloat
/shinkoshigaya/ 5 63 0% 120.5× High JS Bloat
/aoto/ 4 65 0% 82.4× High JS Bloat
/musashisakai/ 4 62 0% 106.1× High JS Bloat
/moriguchi/ 4 60 0% 174.8× High JS Bloat
/shinkamagaya/ 4 60 0% 132.6× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1010 pages
instagram.com ×982
takeda-english.tv ×982
xn--8pr038b9h2am7a.com ×982
takeda-medical.jp ×982
mext.go.jp ×982
twitter.com ×982
dnc.ac.jp ×982
igakubu-note.jp ×982
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/takeda.tv

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to takeda.tv. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
takeda.tv (this site) 78 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 0
thycotic.net 86 87 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 3 Compare →
kondela.hu 86 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 4 Compare →
stylekorean.com 88 93 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 4 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
hikkoshizamurai.jp 88 87 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite takeda.tv when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to takeda.tv. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Takeda",
  "url": "https://takeda.tv",
  "logo": "https://static.takeda.tv/images/home/favicon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Takeda",
  "url": "https://takeda.tv",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://takeda.tv/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Takeda?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Takeda does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Takeda work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Takeda."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for takeda.tv:

Current Score
80
Projected Score
93
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →