sendx.io 79 B
🛡️ SEO 92 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 73

sendx.io — Global SEODiff Score 79/100

sendx.io
📊

With a solid 83/100 ACRI, sendx.io is well-positioned for AI search — better than 97% of sites in the Radar. In the finance sector, sendx.io outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 3.3× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

79
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (52) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 26
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than sendx.io?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)92 × 0.25 = 23.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 23.0 + 34.8 + 10.4 + 10.9
Global SEODiff Score = 79 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
54
Structure
avg 36
82
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 21%
Rank #214333
-18 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 3%
Score 83/100

sendx.io ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 21%) than in AI search (Top 3%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why sendx.io ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryfinance
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.3×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

92/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

55 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

134 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.sendx.io/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Transform Your Email Marketing with SendX - Easy, Reliable, Effective
  • ✓ og:description — Join thousands using SendX for better email deliverability and engagement. Launch campaigns with confidence and see your conversions rise.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the finance sector, bbkonline.com (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
sendx.io
72
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. bbkonline.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 54/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 218 elements (218 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2468
Raw Density8.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

6/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

81
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability81/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

30%
🗑️ 70%
Useful Content (125.3 KB)Bloat (290.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.3× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context42% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage28 / 67 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 42% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

43 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 69.8% · SNR: 0.43 · Signal: 32082 / Noise: 74231 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerAmazonS3
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time634 ms
Raw HTML Size415.3 KB
Visible Text Size125.3 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

634 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2068
DOM nodes
415 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.sendx.io/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

268
internal links
5
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 72/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for sendx.io
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/sendx.io" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=sendx.io" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
72
Single-page score
-10
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 10 pages · Range 54–67
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
35311
Avg Bloat
60.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
10
⚠️
10 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 10 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://sendx.io/features
SendX Features: AI Email Editor & More for Email Marketing Success
pricing 67 24.6× 2820 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/pricing
Simplify Your Business with SendX: Unlimited Emails, Flexible Plans
pricing 64 74.2× 692 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/about
Email Marketing Made Easy | SendX - Effective Campaigns
pricing 64 46.7× 1821 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/products
Email Marketing Made Easy | SendX - Effective Campaigns
pricing 64 46.7× 1821 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/blog
SendX Blog: Email Marketing Tips, Guides & News
pricing 64 26.1× 21901 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/docs
Email Marketing Made Easy | SendX - Effective Campaigns
pricing 64 46.7× 1821 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/faq
Email Marketing Made Easy | SendX - Effective Campaigns
pricing 64 46.7× 1821 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/contact
Email Marketing Made Easy | SendX - Effective Campaigns
pricing 64 46.7× 1821 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/case-studies
Email Marketing Case Studies | Boost Your Business Success with SendX
pricing 54 91.3× 468 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://sendx.io/integrations
Integrate SendX with Your Favorite Tools | 500+ Apps Available
pricing 54 151.7× 325 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/faq/ 1 64 0% 46.7× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 54 0% 91.3× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 54 0% 151.7× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 64 0% 46.7× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 64 0% 74.2× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 64 0% 46.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 64 0% 46.7× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 64 0% 26.1× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 67 0% 24.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 64 0% 46.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
youtube.com ×10
docs.sendpost.io ×10
support.sendx.io ×10
x.com ×10
app.sendx.io ×10
docs.sendx.io ×10
linkedin.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/sendx.io

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar finance Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to sendx.io. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
sendx.io (this site) 72 83 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 1
stearnsbank.com 78 85 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 2 Compare →
hoiku.jinzaibank.com 78 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 2 Compare →
anadolubank.com.tr 78 83 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 2 Compare →
price.ua 81 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 3 Compare →
rsir.com 78 86 WordPress 3.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history