scrcpy.org 81 A
🛡️ SEO 84 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 90

scrcpy.org — Global SEODiff Score 81/100

scrcpy.org
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for scrcpy.org is strong: an ACRI of 80/100 places it ahead of 94% of domains in the index. In the developer sector, scrcpy.org outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 3.0× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. With 4 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

81
A — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Excellent overall visibility. Architecture (90) is your strongest pillar.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 25, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than scrcpy.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)84 × 0.25 = 21.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 21.0 + 32.8 + 13.6 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 81 (A)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 35
88
Schema
avg 10
75
Tech Stack
avg 64
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #811722
-75 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 6%
Score 80/100

scrcpy.org ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 6%). This is the 'Invisible Giant' pattern — implement the patches above to close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why scrcpy.org ranks here

Tech stackNetlify
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat3.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

84/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

53 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

160 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://scrcpy.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — SCRCPY – Android Screen Mirroring Software | Free Download (Latest)
  • ✓ og:description — Download SCRCPY for free. Mirror and control your Android device from your PC with low latency.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
scrcpy.org
62
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 14 elements (14 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words757
Raw Density1.9%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 14 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

5/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

74
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability74/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

33%
🗑️ 67%
Useful Content (12.1 KB)Bloat (24.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 2 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

50 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 66.9% · SNR: 0.50 · Signal: 3100 / Noise: 6258 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNetlify
AI-Readiness Score75/100
ServerNetlify
CDNnetlify
HTTP Status200
Load Time1263 ms
Raw HTML Size36.6 KB
Visible Text Size12.1 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1263 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

262
DOM nodes
37 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public,max-age=0,must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → netlify

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://scrcpy.org/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

19
internal links
1
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for scrcpy.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/scrcpy.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=scrcpy.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to scrcpy.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
scrcpy.org (this site) 62 80 Netlify 3.0× 4
humansignal.com 61 80 Netlify 4.5× 2 Compare →
heartex.com 61 80 Netlify 4.5× 2 Compare →
oscarotero.com 62 73 Netlify 3.5× 1 Compare →
bitcoinops.org 59 75 Netlify 3.3× 1 Compare →
gridly.com 58 75 Netlify 2.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history