reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru 79 B
🛡️ SEO 85 🤖 GEO 91 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 55

reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru — Global SEODiff Score 79/100

reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru
📊

Registering an exceptional 86/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru sits in the highest tier of AI extractability among indexed domains. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 2.0× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. With 15 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

79
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Architecture (55) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 27, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Feb 24 Feb 27
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)85 × 0.25 = 21.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)91 × 0.40 = 36.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)55 × 0.15 = 8.2
Weighted sum = 21.2 + 36.4 + 13.0 + 8.2
Global SEODiff Score = 79 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
56
Structure
avg 36
100
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #883926
-87 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 86/100

reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage15 blocks
Token bloat2.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

85/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

104 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

264 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

91/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 56/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 184 elements (184 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1955
Raw Density9.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks15 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

7/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

87
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability87/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

50%
🗑️ 50%
Useful Content (54.2 KB)Bloat (56.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 1 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

75 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 50.8% · SNR: 0.97 · Signal: 13886 / Noise: 14329 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
SEO agency services for website optimization
Target Audience
Businesses looking to improve online visibility
Pricing Model
Not explicitly mentioned
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-25

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx-reuseport/1.21.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time700 ms
Raw HTML Size110.2 KB
Visible Text Size54.2 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

700 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1070
DOM nodes
110 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

55/100 15 % of Global Score 🔴 Low Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
1
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

✓ TOP 15% AI-READY

🏆 You Are AI-Verified — Claim Your Badge

Your site scores 83/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index. Embed this trust badge on your site — every click sends visitors to your verified report and builds backlinks to your domain.

AI-Verified badge for reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru
Verified — updates automatically every 24h
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

How it works: The badge queries your ACRI score daily. If your score drops below 80 or your site hasn't been scanned in 30 days, the badge changes to "Pending Audit" (yellow) — prompting you to fix issues and rescan. Learn about ACRI methodology →

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru (this site) 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 15
nightstyle.jp 87 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.0× 15 Compare →
martin-sad.ru 87 89 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 63 Compare →
ghoshbabu.com 88 81 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 5 Compare →
jesra.or.jp 88 87 Custom / Proprietary 1.5× 3 Compare →
kruizinga.nl 87 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite reiting-seo-agentstv-moskvy.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history