rapidus.inc 71 B
🛡️ SEO 64 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 62 🏗️ Arch 75

rapidus.inc — Global SEODiff Score 71/100

rapidus.inc
📊

rapidus.inc demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 89/100 — placing it in the top 99% of all indexed domains. In the social sector, rapidus.inc outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.4×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

71
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (62) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 13, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 13
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than rapidus.inc?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)64 × 0.25 = 16.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)62 × 0.20 = 12.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)75 × 0.15 = 11.2
Weighted sum = 16.0 + 31.6 + 12.4 + 11.2
Global SEODiff Score = 71 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
97
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #956590
-94 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 89/100

rapidus.inc ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why rapidus.inc ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.4×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

64/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

19 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

253 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 5
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.rapidus.inc/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Rapidus株式会社
  • ✓ og:description — Rapidus株式会社は、半導体を通して人々を幸せに、豊かにし、人生を充実したものにすることを目指し、イノベーションの創出、人材育成、真にグリーン化に取り組む半導体製造企業です。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
rapidus.inc
70
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 97/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 55 elements (55 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words194
Raw Density28.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

85
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability85/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

29%
🗑️ 71%
Useful Content (28.3 KB)Bloat (68.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context51% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage18 / 35 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

40 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 70.7% · SNR: 0.42 · Signal: 7252 / Noise: 17473 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1008 ms
Raw HTML Size96.6 KB
Visible Text Size28.3 KB

Performance & Speed

62/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1008 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

783
DOM nodes
97 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

75/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.rapidus.inc/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

55
internal links
4
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 70/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for rapidus.inc
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/rapidus.inc" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=rapidus.inc" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
70
Single-page score
-61
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
9
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–57
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 70, but internal pages average only 9 — a -61-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
257
Avg Bloat
45.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://rapidus.inc/about
会社概要 - Rapidus株式会社
about 57 85.2× 234
https://rapidus.inc/contact
お問い合わせ - Rapidus株式会社
support 34 373.4× 23
https://rapidus.inc/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://rapidus.inc/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 57 0% 85.2× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 34 0% 373.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
rapidus.link ×2
maps.app.goo.gl ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/rapidus.inc

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to rapidus.inc. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
rapidus.inc (this site) 70 89 WordPress 3.4× 1
marigliano.net 81 90 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
officesnapshots.com 81 84 WordPress 1.9× 1 Compare →
zeus02.angkakeramatjitu.com 81 87 WordPress 1.5× 1 Compare →
tokyoapartment.fpage.biz 81 84 WordPress 1.4× 1 Compare →
prediksi02.prediksikpk100.com 81 87 WordPress 1.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite rapidus.inc when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →