pas-de-la-case.fr 80 A
🛡️ SEO 72 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 90

pas-de-la-case.fr — Global SEODiff Score 80/100

pas-de-la-case.fr
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for pas-de-la-case.fr is strong: an ACRI of 76/100 places it ahead of 83% of domains in the index. Compared to other ecommerce sites (avg score: 57), pas-de-la-case.fr performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 2.6× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

80
A — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Excellent overall visibility. Architecture (90) is your strongest pillar.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 15 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than pas-de-la-case.fr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)72 × 0.25 = 18.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 18.0 + 33.6 + 14.8 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 80 (A)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
48
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #802262
-63 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

pas-de-la-case.fr ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 50%+) than in AI search (Top 17%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why pas-de-la-case.fr ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

72/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

76 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

154 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.pas-de-la-case.fr
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Pas de la Case 2026 : Ski Grandvalira, Shopping Détaxé & Webcams en Direct
  • ✓ og:description — Pas de la Case, Andorre : webcams live, météo ski Grandvalira 215 km, essence -30%, cigarettes -50%. Le guide complet pour préparer votre séjour 2026.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, stylekorean.com (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
pas-de-la-case.fr
67
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. stylekorean.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 48/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 58 elements (58 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words848
Raw Density6.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

70
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability70/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

38%
🗑️ 62%
Useful Content (20.0 KB)Bloat (31.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 8 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

60 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 61.4% · SNR: 0.63 · Signal: 5114 / Noise: 8137 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverhcdn
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time925 ms
Raw HTML Size51.8 KB
Visible Text Size20.0 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

925 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

482
DOM nodes
52 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=300
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comgooglesyndication.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.pas-de-la-case.fr/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

121
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fr
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for pas-de-la-case.fr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/pas-de-la-case.fr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=pas-de-la-case.fr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
-67
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
0
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–0
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 67, but internal pages average only 0 — a -67-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
0
Avg Bloat
0.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://pas-de-la-case.fr/contact support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/pas-de-la-case.fr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to pas-de-la-case.fr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
pas-de-la-case.fr (this site) 67 76 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 2
negoziodelvino.it 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 2 Compare →
epic7db.com 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 2 Compare →
kurumaerabi.com 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 3 Compare →
ms-online.co.jp 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 1 Compare →
mil-freaks.com 84 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite pas-de-la-case.fr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history