osha.gov 64 C
🛡️ SEO 16 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 86

osha.gov — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

osha.gov
📊

At 78/100, the ACRI for osha.gov indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. In the government sector, osha.gov outperforms the average (58), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 4.0× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (16) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 22 snapshots
Feb 22 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than osha.gov?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)16 × 0.25 = 4.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)86 × 0.15 = 12.9
Weighted sum = 4.0 + 33.6 + 13.0 + 12.9
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
81
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.4%
Rank #3737
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

osha.gov shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why osha.gov ranks here

Tech stackDrupal
Industrygovernment
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

16/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

52 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → http://www.osha.gov/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, gep.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
osha.gov
66
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gep.com has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Drupal. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 81/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 155 elements (155 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words789
Raw Density19.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

69
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability69/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (29.4 KB)Bloat (87.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage13 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

25 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 74.9% · SNR: 0.33 · Signal: 7530 / Noise: 22498 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of osha.gov and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides comprehensive evacuation plans and procedures, including portable fire extinguisher guidance and safety standards, to enhance workplace safety and emergency preparedness.
Target Audience
Safety managers, HR professionals, facility managers, business owners, and anyone responsible for workplace safety and emergency response.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🛡️ Compliance Standards
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(2)
🏆 Competitive Moat
Detailed, standards-based guidance on fire safety and extinguisher usage, combined with a focus on regulatory compliance, differentiates it from general safety resources.
📊 Content Depth
9/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Fire extinguisher type tableClass A, B, C, D, and K fire classificationsExtinguisher operation descriptionsLocations for extinguisher placement
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Limited visual aids beyond the extinguisher label image
Model: mlx-community/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-28 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkDrupal
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerCloudFront
CDNcloudfront
HTTP Status200
Load Time513 ms
Raw HTML Size117.3 KB
Visible Text Size29.4 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

513 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

862
DOM nodes
117 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=1800
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudfront

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

86/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

104
internal links
34
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 66/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for osha.gov
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/osha.gov" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=osha.gov" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 980 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
66
Single-page score
-17
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
50
Avg across 980 pages · Range 29–87
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 66, but internal pages average only 50 — a -17-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
1066474
Avg Bloat
217.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
45
⚠️
45 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 45 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/resources
Recordkeeping - Detailed Guidance for OSHA's Injury and Illness Recordkeeping Rule | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 87 1.8× 62260 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2018-11-09
Cranes and Derricks in Construction: Operator Qualification | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 87 1.7× 56368 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/cranes-derricks-construction/faq
Cranes & Derricks in Construction - Frequently Asked Questions - Revised July 18, 2016 | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 4.6× 7384 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2023-11-20
NASA Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory Operations Contract; Application for Permanent Variance and Interim Order; Grant of Interim Order; Request for Comments | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 4.1× 7070 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2024-09-26
Ballard Marine Construction Lower Olentangy Tunnel Project; Grant of Permanent Variance | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 3.5× 9597 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/enforcement/cwsa/imperial-sugar-company-imperial-savannah-lp-imperial-distribution-inc-07072010
Imperial Sugar Company; Imperial Savannah, L.P.; Imperial Distribution, Inc. - 07/07/2010 | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 4.3× 7811 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2017-01-18
Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2017 | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 3.5× 11396 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2023-08-30
Worker Walkaround Representative Designation Process | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 3.5× 8848 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2023-11-28
Traylor-Sundt Joint Venture: Grant of Permanent Variance | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 3.4× 10431 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/enforcement/cwsa/central-transport-llc-11022016
Central Transport, LLC - 11/02/2016 | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 4.6× 5886 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2024-08-30
Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings; Proposed Rule | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 2.2× 305244 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2018-05-07
Revising the Beryllium Standard for General Industry | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 82 3.2× 11980 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/emergency-preparedness/guides/osha-role-during-response
Worker Protection: OSHA's Role During Response to Catastrophic Incidents Guide | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 9.7× 2256 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/emergency-preparedness/guides/blister-agent
Blister Agents Guide | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 9.5× 2426 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/emergency-preparedness/guides/nerve-agents
Nerve Agents Guide | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 8.6× 2725 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/etools/lockout-tagout/tutorial/printable-version
eTool : Lockout-Tagout - Tutorial - Printer Friendly Version | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 6.5× 4252 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/advisorycommittee/accsh/products/1999-06-10
Advisory Committee On Construction Safety & Health (ACCSH) Multi-Employer Citation Policy Work Group Co-Chair Felipe Devora Co-Chair Danny Evans | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 8.0× 2849 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/faq/
OSHA Frequently Asked Questions | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 6.3× 4698 💰 Pricing
https://osha.gov/faq
OSHA Frequently Asked Questions | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 6.3× 4698 💰 Pricing
https://www.osha.gov/beryllium/rulemaking/faq
Frequently Asked Questions: Beryllium and Beryllium Compounds | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
pricing 77 7.1× 6014 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/alliances/ 290 62 0% 25.2× High JS Bloat
/laws-regs/ 66 65 0% 28.0× High JS Bloat
/etools/ 33 57 0% 49.6× High JS Bloat
/emergency-preparedness/ 12 66 0% 22.8× High JS Bloat
/enforcement/ 9 71 0% 15.1× High JS Bloat
/maritime/ 5 66 0% 19.4× High JS Bloat
/stateplans/ 5 66 0% 19.0× High JS Bloat
/construction/ 2 59 0% 32.0× High JS Bloat
/ionizing-radiation/ 2 63 0% 22.3× High JS Bloat
/advisorycommittee/ 2 72 0% 11.1× High JS Bloat
/preventing-backovers/ 2 60 0% 26.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 2 77 0% 6.3× High JS Bloat
/beryllium/ 2 63 0% 41.2× High JS Bloat
/quicktakes/ 2 59 0% 30.9× High JS Bloat
/shms/ 2 59 0% 29.8× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 980 pages
whistleblowers.gov ×980
regulations.gov ×980
reginfo.gov ×980
dol.gov ×980
youtube.com ×978
instagram.com ×977
whitehouse.gov ×977
twitter.com ×977
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/osha.gov

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to osha.gov. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
osha.gov (this site) 66 78 Drupal 4.0× 0
saskatoon.ca 78 82 Drupal 1.5× 0 Compare →
mentalhealth.gov 79 81 Drupal 4.1× 3 Compare →
gep.com 83 86 Drupal 2.1× 3 Compare →
adaptiveplanning.com 78 91 Adobe Experience Manager 4.9× 1 Compare →
adaptiveinsights.com 78 91 Adobe Experience Manager 4.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite osha.gov when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

77
Homepage ACRI
61
Inner Avg ACRI
+16
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
7%
Inner Avg Ghost
21
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
49 20% pricing https://www.osha.gov/emergency-preparedness/guides
39 20% pricing https://www.osha.gov/contactus/byoffice/doc
39 20% pricing https://www.osha.gov/residential-fall-protection/resources
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 55/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Address: 200 Constitution Ave
🔗

Citation Profile

32 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

239
Total Links
32
Unique Domains
15.9
Avg/Page
13%
Diversity
whitehouse.gov facebook.com linkedin.com osc.gov instagram.com reginfo.gov disasterassistance.gov usa.gov whistleblowers.gov oig.dol.gov
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 30.8

AI trust scores for the domains osha.gov links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to osha.gov. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Osha",
  "url": "https://osha.gov",
  "logo": "https://osha.gov/sites/default/themes/custom/osha/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Osha",
  "url": "https://osha.gov",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://osha.gov/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Osha?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Osha does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Osha work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Osha."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for osha.gov:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
91
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history