linktw.in 76 B
🛡️ SEO 71 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 83

linktw.in — Global SEODiff Score 76/100

linktw.in
📊

At 73/100, the ACRI for linktw.in indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Within the social vertical, this places linktw.in above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 4.0×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 3 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

76
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (65) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 18
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than linktw.in?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)71 × 0.25 = 17.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 17.8 + 32.8 + 13.0 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 76 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
31
Structure
avg 35
46
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 16%
Rank #160855
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

linktw.in shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why linktw.in ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage3 blocks
Token bloat4.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

71/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

192 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 8
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://linktw.in
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — LinkTw.in - Open All Links Directly in Mobile Apps w/ Deep Links
  • ✓ og:description — Create smart short URLs that open directly in mobile apps like Amazon, YouTube, Spotify & 100+ others. Boost conversions by bypassing in-app browsers. Free URL shortener with app deep linking.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
linktw.in
62
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 31/100 — Low
Structured Elements 59 elements (59 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2069
Raw Density2.8%
💡Low structure score (31/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 59 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks3 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

66
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability66/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (37.3 KB)Bloat (110.7 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage83 / 83 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

25 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 74.8% · SNR: 0.34 · Signal: 9559 / Noise: 28334 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of linktw.in and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
LinkTw.in provides a URL shortener that directly opens links in mobile apps, increasing conversions.
Target Audience
Marketing professionals, mobile app marketers, e-commerce businesses
Pricing Model
Free URL shortener with premium features available.
🔗 Integration Partners
AmazonYouTubeSpotify
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique deep linking functionality bypassing in-app browsers for improved user experience.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
How Deep Links WorkPower Up with Deep LinksOne Smart Link for Every Platform
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-08

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time628 ms
Raw HTML Size148.0 KB
Visible Text Size37.3 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

628 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1001
DOM nodes
148 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → BYPASS
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://linktw.in/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

58
internal links
24
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for linktw.in
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/linktw.in" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=linktw.in" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 5 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
-62
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
0
Avg across 5 pages · Range 0–0
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 62, but internal pages average only 0 — a -62-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
0
Avg Bloat
0.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://linktw.in/about about 0 0.0× 0
https://linktw.in/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://linktw.in/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://linktw.in/blog blog 0 0.0× 0
https://linktw.in/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/linktw.in

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to linktw.in. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
linktw.in (this site) 62 73 Custom / Proprietary 4.0× 3
conrad.ba 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 2 Compare →
laestokada.cl 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.6× 4 Compare →
game.blogmura.com 85 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 3 Compare →
sport-tec.de 82 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 2 Compare →
music-city.cz 83 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.3× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite linktw.in when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →