gosmed.ru 62 C
🛡️ SEO 35 🤖 GEO 88 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 82

gosmed.ru — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

gosmed.ru
📊

gosmed.ru achieves a 79/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other ecommerce sites (avg score: 57), gosmed.ru performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. With a 2.6× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (27) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 28, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Feb 23 Feb 28
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than gosmed.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)35 × 0.25 = 8.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)88 × 0.40 = 35.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)82 × 0.15 = 12.3
Weighted sum = 8.8 + 35.2 + 5.4 + 12.3
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
97
Structure
avg 36
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 27%
Rank #271478
-18 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

gosmed.ru ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 27%) than in AI search (Top 9%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why gosmed.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryecommerce
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

35/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

262 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

315 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Многопрофильный медицинский центр - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
  • ✓ og:description — Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова - многопрофильный медицинский центр, осуществляющий деятельность в сфере обязательного медицинского страхования.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

88/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the ecommerce sector, stylekorean.com (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
gosmed.ru
75
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. stylekorean.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 97/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 678 elements (676 lists, 2 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2425
Raw Density28.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

74
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability74/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

38%
🗑️ 62%
Useful Content (119.8 KB)Bloat (195.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context95% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage38 / 40 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

60 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 62.0% · SNR: 0.61 · Signal: 30671 / Noise: 50001 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

A local LLM (mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit) analyzed the extracted content of gosmed.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Multidisciplinary medical care including surgeries, diagnostics, and treatment
Target Audience
Patients, medical insurance companies, and healthcare providers
Pricing Model
Fee-for-service, insurance billing, and direct payments
🔗 Integration Partners
Medical insurance companies
🛡️ Compliance Standards
ISO 9001:2015
Model: mlx-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-4bit · Analyzed: 2026-02-26 · Data extracted from the site’s main content via strict JSON prompting.

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serverddos-guard
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2779 ms
Raw HTML Size315.1 KB
Visible Text Size119.8 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2779 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2774
DOM nodes
315 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

82/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.gosmed.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

689
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 75/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for gosmed.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/gosmed.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=gosmed.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 37 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
75
Single-page score
-12
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
63
Avg across 37 pages · Range 49–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 75, but internal pages average only 63 — a -12-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
68688
Avg Bloat
23.7×
RAG Fractures [?]
5
⚠️
5 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 5 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.gosmed.ru/en/about/history.php
History
pricing 77 10.0× 683 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/en/about/administration-of-the-clinic-structure.php
Administration of the Hospital. Structure
pricing 77 9.0× 942 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/en/about/quality-policy.php
Quality policy
pricing 67 10.6× 636 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/pravila-vnutrennego-rasporyadka-dlya-potrebiteley-uslug.php
Правила внутреннего распорядка для потребителей услуг
pricing 67 16.2× 3331 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/my-v-smi.php
Клиника в СМИ - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 67 15.0× 5836 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/
Информация о клинике - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 67 20.0× 2660 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/prava-i-obyazannosti-grazhdan-v-sfere-okhrany-zdorovya.php
Права и обязанности граждан в сфере охраны здоровья
pricing 67 12.1× 4841 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/vakansii.php
Вакансии
pricing 67 19.2× 2846 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/zashchita-personalnykh-dannykh.php
Защита персональных данных - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 67 13.5× 4213 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/faq/
Вопросы и ответы - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 67 16.7× 3892 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/reviews/
Отзывы пациентов - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 67 16.9× 3253 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/en/about/covid-19-desease-safety-and-health-guidance.php
COVID-19 desease. Safety and health guidance.
pricing 67 12.2× 535 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/en/about/international-organisation-for-standardisation.php
International Organisation for Standardisation
pricing 67 11.6× 566 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/pravila-zapisi-na-pervichnyy-priyem-obsledovanie-konsultatsiyu.php
Правила записи на первичный приём (обследование, консультацию)
pricing 62 28.0× 1737 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/prozhivanie.php
Проживание - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 62 26.2× 1866 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/partners/
Надзорные органы - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 62 35.7× 1390 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/dispanserizatsiya.php
Диспансеризация - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 62 37.0× 1276 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/eksperimentalnye-i-klinicheskie-issledovaniya.php
Экспериментальные и клинические исследования - Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет Клиника высоких медицинских технологий им. Н.И. Пирогова
pricing 62 37.3× 1266 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/infektsionnaya-bezopasnost.php
Безопасность в клинике
pricing 62 25.7× 1938 💰 Pricing
https://www.gosmed.ru/company/informatsiya-organizatsiyam.php
Информация организациям
pricing 62 29.5× 1648 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 37 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/company/ 28 63 0% 26.3× High JS Bloat
/en/ 9 62 0% 15.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 37 pages
vk.com ×37
ok.ru ×28
online.gosmed.ru ×28
t.me ×28
anketa.minzdrav.gov.ru ×27
youtube.com ×10
medtourism.agency ×9
gov.spb.ru ×9
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/gosmed.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar ecommerce Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to gosmed.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
gosmed.ru (this site) 75 79 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0
negoziodelvino.it 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 2 Compare →
epic7db.com 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 2 Compare →
kurumaerabi.com 84 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 3 Compare →
bestcarton.com 85 87 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 3 Compare →
stylekorean.com 88 93 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 4 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite gosmed.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to gosmed.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Gosmed",
  "url": "https://gosmed.ru",
  "logo": "https://gosmed.ru/favicon.ico?1756894810",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Gosmed",
  "url": "https://gosmed.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://gosmed.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Gosmed?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Gosmed does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Gosmed work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Gosmed."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for gosmed.ru:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history