garak.co.kr 24 F
🛡️ SEO 0 🤖 GEO 65 ⚡ Perf 55 🏗️ Arch 73

garak.co.kr — Global SEODiff Score 24/100

garak.co.kr
📊

garak.co.kr registers just 15/100 on the ACRI scale — a bottom-tier result indicating systemic AI visibility problems. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A tight 2.4× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. A full AI bot restriction means AI-powered search and answer engines cannot currently crawl and index this domain's content.

24
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Significant improvement opportunities. Start with Traditional SEO (0).
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 7, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 7
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than garak.co.kr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)0 × 0.25 = 0.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)65 × 0.40 = 26.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)55 × 0.20 = 11.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)73 × 0.15 = 10.9
Weighted sum = 0.0 + 26.0 + 11.0 + 10.9
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 24 (F)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
0
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
42
Structure
avg 36
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 50%+
Rank #773862
-11 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 66%
Score 15/100

garak.co.kr is more visible to Google than to AI models. There's room to improve AI discoverability to match your search reputation. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why garak.co.kr ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.4×

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

0/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

46 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

27 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 5
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✗ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 서울시 농수산식품공사
  • ✓ og:description — 서울농수산식품공사
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

65/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Blocked
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 42/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 6 elements (6 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words112
Raw Density5.4%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

68
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability68/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 5 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

41%
🗑️ 59%
Useful Content (3.0 KB)Bloat (4.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.4× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 4 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

65 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 58.1% · SNR: 0.72 · Signal: 761 / Noise: 1054 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time3541 ms
Raw HTML Size7.1 KB
Visible Text Size3.0 KB

Performance & Speed

55/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

3541 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

75
DOM nodes
7 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

73/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✗ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

3
internal links
0
external links
Limited internal links — consider adding contextual cross-links

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 40/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for garak.co.kr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/garak.co.kr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=garak.co.kr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
40
Single-page score
+15
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
55
Avg across 10 pages · Range 55–55
Total Words
1120
Avg Bloat
13.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://garak.co.kr/pricing
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
pricing 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/about
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
about 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/products
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
product 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/features
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
product 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/docs
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
docs 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/blog
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
blog 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/case-studies
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
social-proof 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/contact
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
support 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/faq
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
support 55 13.0× 112
https://garak.co.kr/integrations
서울시농수산식품공사 랜딩페이지
integrations 55 13.0× 112
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 55 0% 13.0× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/garak.co.kr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to garak.co.kr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
garak.co.kr (this site) 40 15 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 1
kodeli.com.tr 50 72 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
medisana.com 50 66 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 0 Compare →
seiya-saiga.com 50 66 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 0 Compare →
airmailapp.com 50 67 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 0 Compare →
hindixxxsite.com 50 67 Custom / Proprietary 3.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite garak.co.kr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to garak.co.kr. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://garak.co.kr",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://garak.co.kr/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for garak.co.kr:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
32
Improvement
+17 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history