foxsheets.com 65 C
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 85 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 56

foxsheets.com — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

foxsheets.com
📊

foxsheets.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 74/100, outperforming 78% of indexed domains. Within the social vertical, this places foxsheets.com above the industry average of 58 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. With a 4.0× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (34) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Feb 26, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than foxsheets.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)85 × 0.40 = 34.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)56 × 0.15 = 8.4
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 34.0 + 6.8 + 8.4
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
50
Structure
avg 36
4
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 17%
Rank #171101
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

foxsheets.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why foxsheets.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrysocial
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat4.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

142 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

366 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://ufabct168.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → th
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
  • ✓ og:description — ลิงก์ ทางเข้า UFA168 เว็บตรง เว็บแท้ 100% อยู่ที่นี่แล้ว เข้าเล่นผ่าน เว็บหลัก UFABET168 เพื่อไม่ได้โดนเว็บปลอมหลอกให้สมัคร เข้าผ่านเว็บของเรา
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

85/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, plodopitomnik-sad.by (ACRI: 89) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
foxsheets.com
68
Your ACRI Score
89
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. plodopitomnik-sad.by has schema coverage of 11 blocks and uses Express. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 50/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 93 elements (93 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1241
Raw Density7.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
✅ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

61
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability61/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (57.6 KB)Bloat (170.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage21 / 21 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

25 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 74.7% · SNR: 0.34 · Signal: 14753 / Noise: 43591 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time2729 ms
Raw HTML Size227.9 KB
Visible Text Size57.6 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2729 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1020
DOM nodes
228 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

56/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

1
internal links
95
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → th
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 68/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for foxsheets.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/foxsheets.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=foxsheets.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
68
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
70
Avg across 10 pages · Range 70–70
Total Words
7920
Avg Bloat
58.9×
Ext. Citations
7
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://foxsheets.com/pricing
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
pricing 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/about
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
about 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/features
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
product 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/products
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
product 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/blog
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
blog 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/docs
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
docs 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/case-studies
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
social-proof 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/integrations
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
integrations 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/faq
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
support 70 58.9× 792
https://foxsheets.com/contact
UFA168 ทางเข้า UFABET168 เข้าสู่ระบบ เล่นพนันกับเจ้าแรกในไทย
support 70 58.9× 792
🔗
Outbound External Citations
7 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
aff.ufabet168.partners ×10
ufa365.ltd ×10
member.ufabet168.partners ×10
lin.ee ×10
bit.ly ×10
google.com ×10
ufabct168.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/foxsheets.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to foxsheets.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
foxsheets.com (this site) 68 74 WordPress 4.0× 2
ufabet168.partners 68 74 WordPress 4.0× 2 Compare →
ufabct168.com 68 74 WordPress 4.0× 2 Compare →
cleverreach.de 68 81 WordPress 3.9× 2 Compare →
partnersuchefursingles.de 68 81 WordPress 3.7× 2 Compare →
casibella.com 68 77 WordPress 4.4× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →
🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to foxsheets.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Foxsheets",
  "url": "https://foxsheets.com",
  "logo": "https://ufabct168.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/168xo-1-150x150.webp",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for foxsheets.com:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+6 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history