fontworks.co.jp 75 B
🛡️ SEO 64 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 92
Radar → Domains → fontworks.co.jp

fontworks.co.jp — Global SEODiff Score 75/100

fontworks.co.jp
📊

fontworks.co.jp demonstrates elite AI-Readiness, achieving an ACRI of 90/100 — placing it in the top 99% of all indexed domains. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 2.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Structured data coverage is solid at 2 blocks, covering core entities — expanding to include FAQ or Breadcrumb schemas could strengthen the profile further. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

75
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (64) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
64
🛡️ Traditional SEO
80
🤖 AI Readiness
68
⚡ Performance
92
🏗️ Architecture
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 13, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 13
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than fontworks.co.jp?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)64 × 0.25 = 16.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)92 × 0.15 = 13.8
Weighted sum = 16.0 + 32.0 + 13.6 + 13.8
Global SEODiff Score = 75 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 94
100
Structure
avg 36
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 26%
Rank #260616
-25 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 90/100

fontworks.co.jp ranks much higher on Google (Tranco Top 26%) than in AI search (Top 1%). This is the 'Visibility Gap' pattern — implementing the recommendations above can help close the AI gap. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why fontworks.co.jp ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industry—
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
See other WordPress sites → Full leaderboard → Domain A–Z →
🛡️

Traditional SEO

64/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

8 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

285 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 11
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://fontworks.co.jp/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Monotype
  • ✓ og:description — Monotype（旧フォントワークス）は、年間定額制フォントサービスLETSをはじめ、高品質で豊富なフォントを提供しています。150,000以上のフォントが利用できるMonotype Fontsや、Webフォントサービスも展開しています。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

✅
GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
✅
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
✅
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
✅
Google-Extended
Allowed
✅
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 100/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 85 elements (85 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words177
Raw Density48.0%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

86
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability86/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (16.9 KB)Bloat (32.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context56% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage5 / 9 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.4% · SNR: 0.53 · Signal: 4325 / Noise: 8192 tokens
Run Full Entropy Audit →

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of fontworks.co.jp and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Monotype provides a comprehensive suite of font services catering to diverse needs, from individual users to large corporations, offering subscription plans and custom font development.
Target Audience
Graphic designers, web developers, print professionals, large corporations, individual users, and businesses seeking custom font solutions.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based (LETS, FONTPLUS, mojimo), one-time purchases (individual fonts), custom font development pricing varies.
🔗 Integration Partners
iPadiPhone
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive font library (270,000+), custom font development services, specialized fonts for embedded systems (GB18030, UC), and a strong brand reputation.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Template comparison pagesFont directory pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited SEO visibility for specific font types
• Lack of tailored font solutions for embedded systems
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-12

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN—
HTTP Status200
Load Time1570 ms
Raw HTML Size48.9 KB
Visible Text Size16.9 KB
⚡

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1570 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

506
DOM nodes
49 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-store
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

92/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://fontworks.co.jp/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

86
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 72/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for fontworks.co.jp
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold 
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/fontworks.co.jp" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=fontworks.co.jp" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 2 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
72
Single-page score
-29
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 2 pages · Range 37–50
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 72, but internal pages average only 44 — a -29-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
3%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
95
Avg Bloat
287.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://fontworks.co.jp/products
製品・サービス | Monotype
 product 50 172.9× 76 ✓
https://fontworks.co.jp/contact
お問い合わせ | Monotype
 support 37 402.5× 19 ✓
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/products/ 1 50 0% 172.9× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 37 0% 402.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 2 pages
note.com ×2
instagram.com ×2
youtube.com ×2
twitter.com ×2
mojimo.jp ×2
lets.fontworks.co.jp ×2
x.com ×2
fontplus.jp ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API. 

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/fontworks.co.jp

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to fontworks.co.jp. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
fontworks.co.jp (this site) 72 90 WordPress 2.9× 2 —
kawashima-ya.jp 82 84 WordPress 2.7× 2 Compare →
blastengine.jp 82 95 WordPress 2.7× 3 Compare →
cardpay.com 82 89 WordPress 3.2× 1 Compare →
kamsz.ru 82 90 WordPress 2.6× 1 Compare →
subpng.com 82 90 WordPress 5.5× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite fontworks.co.jp when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

📄 Generate llms.txt 📊 Export JSON Data 📸 Download Visual

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking
Open My Site report → Open Self-Diffing incidents → Open History timeline →

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

📚 Research & Documentation

🔬
The Science of ACRI
Methodology behind the AI-Crawler Reality Index scoring model.
🚨
Hallucination Risk Study
How poor crawl access increases AI fabrication rates by 3.5×.
🔥
Structural Entropy Paper
The median web page wastes 55% of tokens on noise. Here's the data.
🧪
Extraction Lab Paper
Causal evidence that semantic HTML structure increases AI extraction accuracy.
📖
Documentation Hub
Metrics definitions, fix guides, and API reference for CI/CD integration.
🛠️
Free Tools
llms.txt generator, hallucination checker, entropy audit, and more.